I've come across this sentiment echoed so many times, and although I don't think dislike is quite the right term to use here, it is still a topic that bothers me.
The main argument behind this seems to be that if a person is behaving polite at all times, one can't reasonably be certain of their wording and mannerisms. A huge gap may exist between the crevices of what they think and say, and for this reason, polite people—by their own nature—are hard to trust. So to speak, they aren't being 'real.'
I understand the concern; it hurts a lot more if a person who is nice to you talks terrible things behind you back, but upon closer inspection, had they been really polite on principle? There may be some social circumstances involved, but it is not inherently impolite to voice distaste, concern or raise disagreement regarding things. If the person living above my floor is making noise at night, I could file a complaint without being an ass about it. Not to mention, there are different levels of politeness for one's social circle. In general, the rule of politeness assumes:
1. People deserve respect and courtesy (common decency, really) befitting being a rationale human.
2. The person is acting on their own goodwill and not with malicious intent until proven otherwise.
Of course, when the goodwill runs out, the result may sometimes be a lot less desirable and drastic (depends on the person) than coming down at hands. However, I do believe it to be a lot more productive and civil than verbally abusing someone as part of being 'real.'
Nice words doesn't always mean nice things; the person can always be real nasty behind it. In most cases, however, they are identifiable with corresponding qualities, mostly arrogance with cases I've seen.
Conclusion: I don't believe it is the end of the world if somebody asked how are you while not expecting a real answer. They can be real. Superficial politeness isn't bad as long as the person isn't an ass. A good person is a good person no matter if they are polite or unafraid of speaking their mind. It is a problem that people nowadays are far apart than ever, but blaming people who are reserved isn't the answer.
[In an evil world, being good is a sin]
---------------------------
Now in 2024 compared to 1900ish
People now learned that "kind face" is often a facade used by villains
And it is now kinda a prejudice
So when someone do a kind action, its the "modern" NORM to doubt it.
To cite an example.
There is this video i saw 3days ago.
Dude goes : My neighbor think i'm a creep
: I was driving my car and saw my neighbor (kid) and said to him "do you want a drive?"
: he then stayed silent and goes "nope"
: he then turned around, walked to the corner and DASHED
(Comments laughing that what he said was indeed SUS)
If it was long far in the past, it would be happily accepted. But its all this "news" kidnapping cases "do you need a drive" that now people
are warned about strangers.
Basically, its now a stereotype, that any kind act, have a trap in it.
Also Its like "free games" = people think there is gonna be monetization (Holocure is a exception and ACCLAIMED FOR IT)
Comedy in cartoons/animes where the mean wife give a gift to husband : Husband goes "Did you do something wrong?"
-----------------------------
In school fightings or in drama-in-comments in general.
HOW MANY TIMES did someone/outsider helped the person correct?
In like X years, i never saw ONE person help. AT. ALL
For school fighting, now its a meta trope, that everyone spectate and only bother to "stop it" when it turn physical. Do they care? Nope. They simply fear the repercussions that would splash on them when it turn physical.
--------------------------
Also, not sure if people knows, but IT SEEMS VERY COMMON, when helping, the helper suffer often.
In a certain place, a few days ago on internet. There was someone giving good opinions and bashed by 2 people. So i bashed the toxics ones / exposed they are bad. And sided with the dude that he is correct and even wishing a good day.
RESULT ?
A outsider-user pop up and say sarcastic things.
And the helped : I feel uncomfortable about this and him fanning the flames
I then ask/talk : Should i have not helped ?
He : Not helpful if you are liability [Which is bs btw as i wasnt]
tdlr : Imagine a anime scene, where there are bullies in school, this classmate is bullied, someone help him. The bullies goes away. And the bullied dislike and mock the person that helped him, saying he didnt need the help.
------------------------
Just 30min ago
Saw a nice post saying :
Internet is an error, people shouldnt have had access to this gigantic information hub. It fucked everything.
Finally i conclude with a chinese internet saying/novel-quote :
A evil person that keep nonstop having evil thought but only did kind acts his whole life until death, is a good person. But a kind person that act on a evil thought once, is a villain.
Or like in chinese MHA fanfic :
Why does it matter if heroes are paid for saving ? For the victim, they dont care if their helper is paid it, they only care that their lives are saved at that moment.