Search results

First big question is for what kind of story this system is. What you have now is very technical and would thus work best in a story that focuses on the magic. For a plot that revolves around people doing things with magic, limits and use cases would be more relevant

The suggestion is to free the authors of the grind to check that I think the idea is to search the trending list for your own work. You can sort by trending

The right shin on the sitting sketch is too short and the socket cable bends too abruptly. The sword one doesn't match body movement with the sword position. Apart from that unasked for criticism, though, this is impressive.

I don't really get the point of using a concept by name only to change most of it from a worldbuilding perspective, but I'm also grateful they don't make their own names that often sound awkward. You missed the best one by a day Link

The point of the system, if you ask the right people, is to feed the recognition addiction of the authors and prop their cardhouse self-esteem. That aside, there is actually no guideline I found that specifies what should and shouldn't warrant a rating apart from "It should be about the book...

Then there's the books I read that either have immortals as passive and bored, or rampant perverts in search to alleviate said boredom.

What would any of that change in regards to your motivation concern, though? 1. This just means that 3 Stars is the new low. The authors know that this is the worst rating they can receive, so why should they feel less bad about it? 2. This is unrelated to motivation and only works if there is...

No, a dick

TrashyHuman, one of the last practitioners of intimidation translating, an art where adepts coerce texts to reveal their meaning by intense staring

if that's your first chapter published, then the story is in the approval process. Takes up to a day

Meh, age seems to be pretty lax on SH. Works like Rupegia don't even bother to hide it that the characters are minors.

So effort. Aight For me it's chance vs engineering. Both work by trial and error. But engineering sounds like the better pick to me when you want existence to care about emotional attachments.

The thing I never understood about this kind of worldview is how sure people are they're outside of influence. It's like irony: you never know how many levels you're on. Then again, maybe effort counts

Kind of a backward logic though. If it spreads because it doesn't matter anymore, why go to such lengths to eradicate it? I don't think it necessarily won't happen, but if, then I doubt it will just be "genetic degradation" through diseases that can now be suppressed that gets fixed or bred...

Maybe remove the part about what you want it to be? You can always ask that after they've given their own impressions and this way it threatens to skew those imo

This will probably sound more antagonistic than I want it to, but aren't you too demanding the other party conform to your expectations? They want you to write the story they'd like to read, you want them to respond to it in a certain way. If that's not your thing, don't read the feedback or...

I don't think a lot of <20 yos see themselves in emotionally incapacitated tit mountains either so big fucking difference