Why! Why no armor!

2021

super straight male & the opposite sex of female
Joined
Jun 24, 2021
Messages
702
Points
93
Why no realism, unless you specifically say why no armor, then why.


State why wizard can’t wear metal. Why no chainmail. Why boob plates, that’ll add more work for poor blacksmiths. Their is leather and fabric & metal based metal armor.


So much, so much potential for armor, and weapons, and you guys waste it. Why only big sword, dagger, bow, smaller sword. Leather armor, Big metal armor, robes.


I want cool descriptions of armors, and weapons.

-
But seriously theres a lot of story potentia in why said character where’s that, instead of that, is It because that set of armor has
advantages to being able to use a bow, or one made to be good against slash, and stab, but bad against crushing damage
 

NotaNuffian

This does spark joy.
Joined
Nov 26, 2019
Messages
5,287
Points
233
Cuz it is just a simple series with the author trying not to overcompensate with words?

I once heard that the (lame) reason why wizards wear no armor is because a fire ball can still cook the guy alive and a knight can run his fade with ease with a nerd. Therefore, no need to waste armor on the skimpy scholar.
 

2021

super straight male & the opposite sex of female
Joined
Jun 24, 2021
Messages
702
Points
93
What people?
Authors. Because it seems I’m the only one attracted to how metal works, damn it’s sexy, how in shapes, all its uses… *cough* nevermind that. Authors, well Most skip it
Cuz it is just a simple series with the author trying not to overcompensate with words?

I once heard that the (lame) reason why wizards wear no armor is because a fire ball can still cook the guy alive and a knight can run his fade with ease with a nerd. Therefore, no need to waste armor on the skimpy scholar.
But when It done write it just add’s on to the greatness. Fade? What’s that
 

Yairy

The Dreamer of Wonderland!
Joined
Jun 1, 2020
Messages
302
Points
103
No armor in a fantasy story? I just don't find people all bulked up... cool. I know it's unrealistic but geez... visually armor does not look appealing to me.
 
D

Deleted member 54065

Guest
It's simple.

If you like a fully-armored character, go for it. If you don't, then go for it.

Unless you're writing a non-fiction, or a reality-based fiction, anything goes in one's mind. That's why it's called 'fantasy'.

And don't go looking for dot-for-dot logic in a world populated by mythical creatures and where magic is existing.

The world would be much better if one would just live and let live. ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NotaNuffian

This does spark joy.
Joined
Nov 26, 2019
Messages
5,287
Points
233
But when It done write it just add’s on to the greatness. Fade? What’s that
It means the knight can run a train against the nerd. Clap his cheeks. Drag him back to the alley dumpster for sodomizing.

It means that the knight can pwn the nerd.
 

BenJepheneT

Syro - Aphex Twin
Joined
Jul 14, 2019
Messages
5,347
Points
233
this whole ass post

 

lnv

✪ Well-Known Hypocrite
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
487
Points
133
Why no realism, unless you specifically say why no armor, then why.


State why wizard can’t wear metal. Why no chainmail. Why boob plates, that’ll add more work for poor blacksmiths. Their is leather and fabric & metal based metal armor.


So much, so much potential for armor, and weapons, and you guys waste it. Why only big sword, dagger, bow, smaller sword. Leather armor, Big metal armor, robes.


I want cool descriptions of armors, and weapons.

-
But seriously theres a lot of story potentia in why said character where’s that, instead of that, is It because that set of armor has
advantages to being able to use a bow, or one made to be good against slash, and stab, but bad against crushing damage

They wear it, it is called plot armor.

That said, the real reason why a wizard doesn't wear heavy armor is, why? Wizards are a RANGE class, who gets little exercise. Wearing heavy armor would tire them out. They are better off running then fighting close range.

As for chainmail, it is common for all classes to wear light chainmail underneath their leather or cloth. I've seen it mentioned all the time. You don't exactly want to advertise you are wearing it, making opponent believe you have only cloth can save your life.

Also, lots of works have spears too.
 

Ilikewaterkusa

You have to take out their families...
Joined
May 21, 2021
Messages
2,373
Points
153
Why no realism, unless you specifically say why no armor, then why.


State why wizard can’t wear metal. Why no chainmail. Why boob plates, that’ll add more work for poor blacksmiths. Their is leather and fabric & metal based metal armor.


So much, so much potential for armor, and weapons, and you guys waste it. Why only big sword, dagger, bow, smaller sword. Leather armor, Big metal armor, robes.


I want cool descriptions of armors, and weapons.

-
But seriously theres a lot of story potentia in why said character where’s that, instead of that, is It because that set of armor has
advantages to being able to use a bow, or one made to be good against slash, and stab, but bad against crushing damage
Wizards want to look cool, also they don’t lift so they will be crushed
 
D

Deleted member 54065

Guest
I agree with the armor argument. you need to draw bigger thighs. more muscle + more fat = better defense
Again, as much as anyone else wants to say that my illustration is 'impossible', my only answer is...

I draw what I want. And I don't think I'm being paid for me to implement the changes. As the artist of MY own work, I know what I want to show and what I like to do.

Also, don't look for dot-to-dot logic in an already illogical setting. It's a waste of time.

My work, my rules. Unless I'm working on a non-fiction or non-fantasy fiction. Let's respect that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ai-chan

Queen of Yuri Devourer of Traps
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
1,668
Points
153
Why no realism, unless you specifically say why no armor, then why.


State why wizard can’t wear metal. Why no chainmail. Why boob plates, that’ll add more work for poor blacksmiths. Their is leather and fabric & metal based metal armor.


So much, so much potential for armor, and weapons, and you guys waste it. Why only big sword, dagger, bow, smaller sword. Leather armor, Big metal armor, robes.


I want cool descriptions of armors, and weapons.

-
But seriously theres a lot of story potentia in why said character where’s that, instead of that, is It because that set of armor has
advantages to being able to use a bow, or one made to be good against slash, and stab, but bad against crushing damage
To answer why wizards can't wear metal, let's look at real life comparison. You make a neet run a kilometer wearing metal armour. Do you think he will be able to complete the run? Wizards are like neets, except they have magic, but their magic wouldn't necessarily mean they are capable of lifting heavy metal plates.

As for boob plates, Ai-chan guesses it's just to make it easier for big breasted warriors to fit into their armour without adding bulk. The thinner part would be on the breastmeat but because it's curved, it would be as safe as any other part. As for more work, it isn't that much work compared to a flatter plate mail. A proper blacksmith would have that circular thing that they use to curve metal plates for making helmets, so it's not that much of a problem. They just need to pummel the plate for like 10 minutes each.

Also, chainmail is actually extremely heavy! A suit of chainmail that covers from your shoulders to your arms and your knees would be much heavier and encumbering than a full platemail. Yeah, it doesn't sound possible, right? But it is, a suit of chainmail could be 1.5 times heavier than a platemail that covers the same areas.

Don't know why you want cool descriptions of armour and weapons, though. The simpler the weapons and armour are, the better they perform. As a certain weapon historian once said, "The sword is shaped like that for a reason, leave it alone!"

Generally, leather armour, or boiled leather armour is very abundant and doesn't require much skill in processing. In theory, you can set up a tanning cottage from nothing and start producing hundreds of leather armour in just a week assuming you have the hides to work with. Leather armour is also impossible to set on fire, unless you throw flammable oil on it first. So it's used from roof cover, to wall cover, to carriage cover and to ram roof cover. So if you need to equip thousands of soldiers quickly or on the go, leather armour is better than nothing. If you have some time, you can create boiled leather armour, which is as stiff as metal armour. As for stopping power, leather armour has some ability to protect against knives, though stopping sword strikes require at least a boiled leather armour. Still, even simple leather armour can protect you from major sword wound in battle. The simulations we see where a sword is matched with leather armour is assuming that the attacker has the time and space to swing their swords at full power at full swing. In a melee, you don't always have that opportunity. If you also wear a gambeson under the leather armour, you can practically consider the threat of arrows beyond 100 meters range to be nonexistent.

Metal armour, for the purpose of this discussion shall be considered simple steel, is very hard to prepare. You need a lot of resources to set up a production site, so you'd mostly be stuck with depending on existing facilities. If there is no existing facility, well, you're screwed. An army would usually have a blacksmith or two on the go during campaigns, but these people would not have the facility to make metal armour. They would, in most cases only have the capability to repair weapons and armour or sharpen dull weapons. The forge needed to make new armour would not be mobile, these mobile blacksmiths would mostly only have something like a more elaborate brazier. And then you'd also need to lug coal around, because you wouldn't be able to make coal on the go, unless you also have a large number of coalmakers and you often spend a week resting in one place between battles.
 
Last edited:

Jemini

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Messages
2,037
Points
153
There are all kinds of justifications as to why a wizard doesn't wear armor. But, at the end of the day, it all boils down to attempts at justifying the traditional "image" of what a wizard is.

Besides, wizards are always WAY freaking OP. Gotta nurf them somehow so the warriors at least stand some slight semblance of a chance. (That is, unless your excuse is that the robes are made of some special material that acts like armor. If that's the case, then it's game over for all warriors. Pro tip, this excuse should be avoided outside of cultivation novels. Those mountain wizards can have all the cloth armor they want since they're exclusively fighting other sky wizards. Don't give it to your liteRPG wizards though. That's just broken. They actually do fight against the warriors, so you've gotta keep it somehow balanced.)
 
Top