The Last to Comment Wins

Tempokai

The Overworked One
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Messages
1,396
Points
153
I'm winning currently by preparing a lot of stuff to printing
 

Tempokai

The Overworked One
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Messages
1,396
Points
153
The Aliveness of the Author
(or: My Characters Are Not Gay Unless I Say So)


In his trashy yet strangely addictive fantasy webnovel Sword of Midnight Regret, ArtyMancer88, speaking of a hero with unnaturally flowing silver hair and eyes that “betrayed a sorrow deeper than oceans,” writes this sentence: “He turned away, because his pain was a sword too sharp for words.” Who is speaking in this way? Is it the brave yet terminally brooding protagonist, so concerned with angsting at the moon that he forgets to blink? Is it the author, ArtyMancer88, whose username conceals a 42-year-old accountant with a black belt in cringe and a Wattpad account older than some gods? Is it the anonymous power of online melodrama made flesh? Is it Tumblr-era tragic masculinity? Or perhaps universal fanfic law?


None of these. Because for once, we do know exactly who is speaking — it’s the author, who just replied to Comment #452 with:


“Lmao no he’s not gay, stop projecting ? it’s about trauma not romance pls read properly.”

Let us be clear: the Author is not dead. He is very much alive, logged in, and sniping at readers from beneath his anime avatar. He walks among us in the sacred digital margins of AO3, Tapas, and Royal Road, where every reader is a potential shipper, and every innocent sentence is a ticking semantic time bomb.


···


Once upon a time, criticism dreamt of a utopia where the author was irrelevant. That time is over. The modern landscape of writing — a sticky swamp of hashtags, comments, Patreon polls, and nervous breakdowns — has resurrected the Author, and not as a god, but as a grumpy admin. He comes bearing receipts, canon lore, and a deep-seated need to clarify that no, the main character is not a metaphor for late-stage capitalism — he’s just bad at feelings.


And yet, we continue to pretend that interpretation is free, that texts are liberated playgrounds, that meaning is a frolicsome goat leaping from reader to reader in blissful postmodern glee. This is false. The goat has a leash, and it’s being yanked by the Author every time someone misreads the cliffhanger and leaves a comment like:


“omg I can’t believe he died ??”

To which the Author replies:


“Chapter title is ‘A Trick of Shadows’ come on, how would I kill him off in Book 2??”

This is the current state of literature: a battlefield of hot takes, misunderstood foreshadowing, and the author barging in mid-analysis to shout, “ACTUALLY.” Interpretation no longer floats serenely into the void of reader consciousness; it’s body-checked by the author’s live commentary, Discord Q&A, and Tuesday livestream.


···


Probably this has always been the case: once a story begins to gather fandom, the author cannot help but hover — spectrally at first, then fully manifested, username bolded, replying to headcanon threads with phrases like,


“Love that idea! But canonically he’s a Capricorn.”

Thus, the reader is not a free agent, but a supplicant at the temple of Authorial Clarification. What began as the Age of the Reader has become the Reign of the Author, where narrative ambiguity is just an error waiting to be explained in a blog post.


No longer the shaman, the mystic, or the impersonal weaver of tales, the modern author is a customer service representative, fielding live complaints like:


“Why is there no romance yet???”

To which the author responds:


“Because it’s slow burn. That’s the point.”

Hence, the reader’s desire for multiplicity is constantly thwarted by canon, by intention, by The Spreadsheet™, wherein the author tracks every hair color, trauma, and off-screen breakfast. It is not language that speaks — it is the author, in the comments, in the Discord server, in the glossary of terms that is inexplicably longer than the story itself.


···


In the age of forums and threads, the Author’s ghost has become flesh. Barthes dreamed of a literature free from authority, where meaning was a slippery, joyful mess. What he failed to foresee was the birth of digital serialization, where the author is not only alive — they’re monitoring your reading habits via analytics and getting mildly offended when Chapter 12 has fewer likes.


Indeed, the modern webnovel is written not in a vacuum, but in a terrifying ecosystem where every word is immediately scrutinized by fans wielding Google Translate, screenshot receipts, and dubious TikTok theory videos. In this climate, writing is no longer a performative act in the Barthesian sense — it’s a negotiation, occasionally a hostage situation. The reader says,


“He looked at his best friend too long. That means he’s in love.”
The Author replies:
“No. He’s thinking about the prophecy. Please stop tagging it ‘slowburn mlm’ on AO3.”

···


Let us consider a text. Not as a divine tissue of culture, but as a comment magnet. Each chapter a fresh opportunity for misinterpretation, each sentence a landmine of potential shipping wars. Meaning is no longer diffused; it is aggressively clarified, corrected, and in extreme cases, deleted and rewritten because the Author read too many angry Reddit threads and spiraled.


Barthes believed the author’s presence was a limit — a final stop that arrested meaning. He was wrong. The author’s presence is not a stop. It’s a tripwire. It sets off alarms, triggers “Actually…” responses, and spawns entire clarification novellas titled The Canon Explanation You All Ignored. The Author is not dead — he’s rewatching your YouTube essay at 2x speed and mumbling, “You sweet summer child…”


We must acknowledge: literature is now a team sport. But the referee is the author, and he’s mad you missed the subtext. He is very much alive, very online, and fully prepared to die on the hill that Chapter 17’s epigraph was not a Nietzsche reference — it just sounded cool.


···


And so, to return to ArtyMancer88’s sentence — “He turned away, because his pain was a sword too sharp for words” — who speaks it? Is it the hero? Is it the voice of melancholy itself? No. It is the Author, alive in the comment section, typing frantically at midnight:


“Pls stop reading romance into this. He just needs therapy.”

The birth of the reader, it turns out, does not require the death of the author. It merely requires the author to get better Wi-Fi.


Let us then not mourn the Author. Let us mute him, if necessary. But let us also accept that he’s watching. Always watching. Especially when you misinterpret Chapter 9.


Long live the Author.
(And no, your ship is not canon.)
 

Arkus86

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
790
Points
133
waaaagh.jpg
 

BearlyAlive

I'm not savage, you're just average
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
1,977
Points
153
If an undead gets bitten by a living person, does it turn into an unalive?
 

JayMark

It's Not Easy Being Nobody, But Somebody Has To.
Joined
Jul 31, 2024
Messages
1,732
Points
128

The Man Who Existed by Existing


Harold was alive by being in a state of not being dead.

He woke up because being awake meant he had opened his eyes while not being asleep.

He walked into the kitchen by having used his legs to transport himself into the kitchen-space.

He made coffee by making coffee in the manner one makes coffee.

He drank it because the act of drinking involves consuming liquids intentionally.

He enjoyed the coffee by experiencing joy due to enjoying it.

Then he stared at the wall by facing a vertical structure while using his eyes to behold its wall-ness.

Thinking thoughts occurred because his brain was engaged in the activity of thought-having.

He reflected on his life by reflecting upon the experiences he had experienced in life.

“Today is today,” he muttered, because the day that was today was, in fact, the current day.

He got dressed by applying clothing to his body in order to be dressed.

The pants were on because they had been successfully worn in the way pants are worn.

The socks clung to his feet by virtue of foot-clinging sock behavior.

He tied his shoes because shoes that are tied require tying to become tied.

Then he left the house by exiting the house in a manner consistent with house-leaving.

Outside was outside because it was not inside and thus occupied the space known as “out.”

The sun was shining due to the sun engaging in the process of shining.

Harold squinted by narrowing his eyes in reaction to the bright light that caused him to squint.

He walked down the street by advancing along the street in a walking fashion.

Each step was a step because it was a movement made by stepping.

He encountered a neighbor who was neighboring in a neighbor-like way.

They greeted one another by saying greetings in the act of mutual greeting.

“How are you?” asked the neighbor by asking how Harold was.

“I’m being fine by being in a state of fine-being,” Harold replied with existential certainty.

They nodded at each other by moving their heads in a nodding motion to express head-nodding agreement.

Harold continued walking by continuing to walk with continued motion.

He reached the store by arriving at the store's location through the act of reaching.

He went inside by no longer being outside and transitioning into the state of being inside.

The store was a store because it sold things in a place where things are sold.

He picked up a loaf of bread by lifting the bread from its resting place using a pick-up motion.

He chose that loaf by selecting it due to the choice he made to choose it.

At the counter, he paid for it by giving money in exchange for ownership transfer via payment.

The cashier thanked him by expressing thanks in the way cashiers typically thank.

He said “you’re welcome” because he had welcomed the thanks with a welcome response.

Back outside, he walked home by returning to his home via walking in a home-returning direction.

Once home, he sat in his chair by lowering himself into a sitting position atop the chair.

The bread sat on the table by resting upon the table surface with bread-like stillness.

Harold stared at it by looking in its direction with intentional bread-staring effort.

He thought to himself, “I exist right now by existing in this current moment of existence.”

And that, to Harold, was enough reason to feel content by being contented with feeling content.
I'm going to murder you via the process of murdering. *this is a joke told jokingly*
 

Anonjohn20

Pen holding member
Joined
Mar 22, 2023
Messages
1,848
Points
153
?

EDIT: Imma have to go to sleep early tonight. Forgive me, fellow winners.
 
Top