NotaNuffian
This does spark joy.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2019
- Messages
- 5,287
- Points
- 233
It is at this point as I typed this, I giggled at the hypocrisy of Naruto. "Hardwork can make you go to the top"... what happened to Rock Lee in the first season then? What happened to Might Guy in Shippuden then? Naruto himself is hardworking-ish (ignoring his idiocy), but let's not be completely blind to the fact that he has a deus in his tummy in the first season and in the second season, full blown nepotism × MC is special treatment.
What about wuxia that supposed to showcase meritocracy because its audience is mostly a bunch of 99%? Packs of lies. Guo Jing is the son of a famous general and that nets him a bunch of masters teaching him kungfu (granted the seven freaks are terrible teachers and the MC is an inflexible block of wood whose greatest feat is GRIND to git gud). Must be nice to have one of the superpowers to be "Screw the law, I have connections!"
This is coming from a cloutless loser with no connection... and yes I get that having connection is like buying battlepacks that grants you boost in EXP and drops ONLY if you play, so hardwork is still paramount...
After wasting three paragraphs to write pointless rants about why I am poor, let me start on the topic about mages versus mutants.
For context, the mages I am referring to ranges from pure DnD wizards, those that studied hard and earn their magic, to hybrid wizards with a dash of Coffeelock, ie better magic bloodline for higher affinity in magic and larger mana pool, which are standard in the typical novels.
Mutants are mutants... as low as the useless Epsilons and capped at Alpha levels instead of Marvel's Omegas (because they are demi gods).
In terms of power level for both, I am capping them both at city destroying level, that is a mage can cast a city destroying spell with his own life or a mutant capable of nuking an entire city but it burns him out as well.
I was thinking to include both a mutant capable of learning lower tier magic and a mage capable of mutating thanks to mutagen ooze, but then the fight between the two will be too crowded and confusing.
Tldr: between a standard mage that can cast shield, fireball and other standard magics versus Gambit, who has a higher chance of victory?
What about wuxia that supposed to showcase meritocracy because its audience is mostly a bunch of 99%? Packs of lies. Guo Jing is the son of a famous general and that nets him a bunch of masters teaching him kungfu (granted the seven freaks are terrible teachers and the MC is an inflexible block of wood whose greatest feat is GRIND to git gud). Must be nice to have one of the superpowers to be "Screw the law, I have connections!"
This is coming from a cloutless loser with no connection... and yes I get that having connection is like buying battlepacks that grants you boost in EXP and drops ONLY if you play, so hardwork is still paramount...
After wasting three paragraphs to write pointless rants about why I am poor, let me start on the topic about mages versus mutants.
For context, the mages I am referring to ranges from pure DnD wizards, those that studied hard and earn their magic, to hybrid wizards with a dash of Coffeelock, ie better magic bloodline for higher affinity in magic and larger mana pool, which are standard in the typical novels.
Mutants are mutants... as low as the useless Epsilons and capped at Alpha levels instead of Marvel's Omegas (because they are demi gods).
In terms of power level for both, I am capping them both at city destroying level, that is a mage can cast a city destroying spell with his own life or a mutant capable of nuking an entire city but it burns him out as well.
I was thinking to include both a mutant capable of learning lower tier magic and a mage capable of mutating thanks to mutagen ooze, but then the fight between the two will be too crowded and confusing.
Tldr: between a standard mage that can cast shield, fireball and other standard magics versus Gambit, who has a higher chance of victory?