If you had read my response, I already said no. Look...
...No, they all suck at factoring in human behavior, I'll even put it in bold since reading comprehension obviously isn't your thing. There is a literal branch of economics called behavioral economics to talk about how human interaction doesn't fit in to their flawed theories.
I see, so no is your response. So according to you, a socialist cannot be possibly an excellent economist despite the fact that you initially claimed that "No one in this thread has claimed that a socialist can't be an economist.".
Apparently that was not the case.
That being said, I will quote my predecessor, with whom you agreed readily.
"socialist or capitalist =/= economist.
You can be either and be an expert economist.
An economist is just someone who understands the relationship of how resources are distributed within society, as well as how society is motivated to interact with the economy.
It's just the majority of socialists we have had in the past, have been very poor economists.
Correlation =/= causation."
Thus, we must conclude that it is indeed possible for a socialist to be an excellent economist, which was my entire point, to begin with.
