Search results

I heard that a good way to describe AI is glorified autocorrect. Writing with it is just the more advanced version of clicking the random words that appear there. That's also why AI hallucinates and lies so frequently. It knows nothing. It just generates. You are completely right. AI is slop...

Romance sucks. The love interest is usually reduced to being just 'a love interest', instead of being their own person. I always feel sorry for them.

I came here out of curiosity, to come up with ideas for pranking my brother. This was not what I expected. At all. But yes. If someone comes to you offering free shaboink? You are not the MC of an ecchi harem, or a sweet CEO romance novel. RUN. RUN LIKE THE WIND.

Eh, my favorite novel right now is one of those types. The MC is transmigrated into a horror novel. (Think SCP universe.) He has zero powers or magic or whatever, but he is a major horror geek and knows all the stories and legends. The story is about him trying to figure out a way out of the...

Um...as a past writer (Wattpad one) who once abandoned several perfectly popular novels with decent views and comments... I was embarrassed of my work, okay? It happens to people. You reread your stuff, and realize it was the worst slop ever written, that should have never entered public eye...

Thank. You. Exactlyyyy. I don't even care if they upload AI edited stuff, but they should at least tell their readers that! And the people they ask to review their novel!

Chatgpt works well for most cases. You just have to make sure your tone is unbiased when you ask it for help, and you have to ask it to judge entire chapters or more, not a sentence or paragraph. Sapling works ok. I tested it out on my writing, some other writing from this site, and AI...

I am East Asian. I know these three languages. Not only do I read these webnovels, I write em. But to explain my view and get to the point. If you ask AI to write an action scene and make it short and impactful, they will use tons of sentence fragments and make the whole thing nigh unreadable...

It's ok if you admit it. It looks like you didn't know you should inform people beforehand, so it's fine. Again, as the reviewer, it just gets on my nerves cuz it's hard to tell you what to fix. Any big mistakes you have are kinda blended into boring meaningless text. For now, maybe edit...

I didn't know that? Story covers and new stories get approved and flagged on the site all the time, so I assumed we had more staff. ...But I still stand my ground. Even if you can't enforce it, Tony, just add it as another content warning tag/mark.

Eh, maybe. But in the end, I agree it doesn't really matter. If it sounds like boring AI, it sounds like boring AI, and people will not read it. Even if it is not actually AI. Whichever is the case, that's the review. Sounds like AI.

...Flag it, and the people running the site will review the novel, send it through a AI checker, and if all signs point to yes, they will ask the writer to send in proof that the writing was not AI influenced, or they will add the 'AI-edited' tag. Sounds reasonable to me? And it's not like not...

I tried. My ChatGPT says it was human-written? Maybe you accidently sounded like you wanted it to reply that the writing was AI? You want to sound completely unbiased, or it'll agree with you no matter what.

Exactly! I ran it through a checker and ChatGPT, and they say the writing is heavily AI influenced. It may be wrong, but that's what it says. And I am not wasting my time reviewing AI stuff. Exactlyyy. I loveeeee em.

I meant the people who run the site? You wouldn't doxx it publicly, of course. But if your story gets flagged for not having the AI-edited tag, except you didn't use AI, and you need proof, this can be said proof you give to the moderators. Access to the doc and history, or screenshots of said...

Yeah, but if it's not AI, the author can fix it. I'll repost here for everyone else when the screenshots come, so that we know it's not AI edited. :blob_melt: