You know, I know I asked for it, so you might have had a point. However, I think you're being a little too harsh. Now I did ask for you to judge my story, but I reserve the right to judge your judging.
1. I'm sorry that my favorite artist who's actually really good with fantasy art isn't up to your standards. But I don't do AI generation for cover art, I prefer actual artists.
2. Probably your most legitimate criticism. I wasn't trying to go for drama, and maybe I should have. So I redid my synopsis (what I assume you mean by my blurb) so it's a little more eye-catching and emphasized.
3. This seems like more of an issue with your expectations than my presentation.
3a. Jack does react, but his reaction style is dry humor and compartmentalization. For example:
- “Well, Toto. Guess we ain’t in Kansas anymore.”
- “So that’s the baseline now.”
- “Great.”
- “Oh, you’ve got to be shitting me.”
Those are classic pragmatic protagonist reactions. This is actually very common in action fantasy protagonists. It follows the lineup of Ash from Evil Dead, Harry Dresden, and Geralt of Rivia.
They react with sarcasm instead of panic. You seem to prefer dramatic emotional reactions, but that’s a style preference, not an objective flaw.
3b. Now it's true, Jack doesn't provide any verbal reflection upon discovering he's in another world. But that doesn't mean that the story is too fast.
My storytelling is fast, but not unnecessarily so. It's efficient. I'm not going for pointless agonizing, because my character wouldn't do that.
He'd think about what works and do that.
Now given what I've learned later, I may go back and actually fix it with some thoughts that he might have about the situation, but it's mostly going to be his internal monologue thinking about what to do next, rather than simply emoting in despair.
3c. Your criticism about the villagers not reacting is... Honestly kind of weak.
The villagers are staring, pointing, whispering, I describe a kid grabbing a rock, people gripping tools, and there's even confusion about "dwarven craftsmanship".
You want the villagers to react like a monster charged in. But that’s not how humans usually behave. Most people freeze and stare first.
So I’d call this criticism outright wrong.
3d. "Jack is flat with no personality."
I don't know how you managed to bungle this.
Jack actually shows clear personality traits. He's mechanically minded, which you see the engine repair scene. He uses dry humor (The Kansas line, the witch joke, etc.).
He's attached to his car, this even becomes the emotional anchor. He's a problem solver. He figures out the illusion beast logically.
And he has a controlled temper. He only explodes when the car gets damaged.
Which leads to him kicking the monster corpse for damaging the car.
And you say he's flat?
That scene is actually great characterization. It tells us Jack values control and competence, and the car is his symbol of order.
And that's not me saying that, that's my test readers.
4. Plus, you ignored the monster fight, you ignored the obvious peanut butter candy tell, and you ignored the witch hook.
On top of that... Comparing this to another story really doesn't mean anything. “American guy + muscle car + fantasy world” is a broad trope.
That’s like saying “Someone already wrote a story about a wizard.” Readers care about execution, not uniqueness.
Thank you for the criticism, but if you're being too harsh about it I'm going to say something about it. And you're being waaaay too harsh.
Last edited:
Mine is not comedy but I have similar cute little modern weapons. The front chapters are full of gender bender so it's not going anywhere at all.
