Hi guys, nice to meet you. I'm not really anyone important, but if it's not too much trouble, I'd really appreciate it if you could read my novel, even just the prologue or a few chapters. If possible, I'd also like to hear some feedback, either about the story itself or privately about your experience. Honestly, I'm not sure if I'm doing it right. I like it, of course, but I don't know if it would be good from someone else's perspective, since my friends aren't really big readers...
Well, after reading 3 chapters (including the prologue) in once reading to gauge immersion, I'm giving you feedback as a reader.
My general impression... your chapters are
quite immersive. If these chapters were read by a casual, casual reader, they might be hypnotized and feel as if they are living the story through the MC.
Your chapters clearly demonstrate your narrative ability in applying the principle of show it, don't tell it!
Your narrative knows when to show in dramatic scenes. Your narrative knows when to tell to explain what the MC is feeling and summarize the whole scene at the end of the chapter.
This is clearly not a narrative skill that a beginner author who just learned a few day. I'm guessing you might be quite experienced in narrating fiction, you have narrative competence either through experience (trial and error) or learning from literary theory. But that's beyond this discussion, so I stop here.
Back to the topic... based on the chapters I've read, your narrative seems to tend to use the
omniscient third POV. That's a relevant decision for an epic narrative. This is characterized by the narrative camera shifting from character to character, showing the worldbuilding around the characters and sometimes even delving into the feelings and thoughts between characters.
However, your narrative is quite controlled. You managed to avoid the
head-hopping that is prone to occur in the third omniscient POV through scene blocking, character placement, and the use of relevant tags.
I am quite sure... your narrative successfully uses a "
controlled narrator," a narrator who controls the narrative and its interpretation.
For example, "Michael smiled, a nostalgic, genuine smile that transformed his haggard face for an instant." The narrator in this scene is quite adept at framing phenomena and meaning.
The narrative initially shows the scene of the MC smiling. But the narrator immediately directs the interpretation of the smile as "...a genuine smile that transformed his haggard face for an instant."
This pattern is quite consistently applied in the chapters I read. In fact, your narrative always provides a summary or final interpretation at the end of each chapter.
The narrator here really knows how to 'control' the reader's perception. Well, this is the advantage of your narrative. You truly know how to be a 'narrator' who controls the narrative.
Now, I turn to the shortcomings of your narrative. Your narrative does indeed manage to maintain a balance between showing and telling.
However, I still encountered raw emotions several times. For example, "Dont mention it!" Xix boasted. This narration is given in the context of dialogue.
However, the "boasting" is a telling. This is a minor complaint, but it can slightly disrupt the reader's immersion. Maybe you want a quick context, that's fine. But giving a showing at this moment might be more impactful.
Instead of saying "Xix boasted", the narrative could show through body language, for example, "Xix crossed his arms, his lips turned upward." This narrative would feel more immersive and cinematic because the reader can immediately imagine it and interpret it simultaneously.
Also, perhaps you could add more subtle narration through showing without telling rather than controlled narration. Sometimes we need to trust the reader to determine their interpretation.
A controlled narrative with a showing + telling formula is good. But if it is done excessively, the reader can eventually get bored and 'realize' they are being directed by the narrator.
Sometimes you need to let the characters and the world interact organically and leave the interpretation up to the reader.
Lastly, an optional suggestion... add
onomatopoeia for sensory narratives that indicate sounds.
For example, "Aarrgg..." for the sound of a groan of pain. "Doom!" for the sound of an explosion.
Adding onomatopoeia will allow the reader to hear the sound directly in their mind. It makes the scene feel more alive, more immersive.
However, some people might dislike it because they think it's cartoonish (onomatopoeia is common in manga and LN).
That's my feedback. I hope it helps (or maybe not).
Regards.
Critical Note:
My assessment may be biased. I'm simply providing honest feedback based on my reading experience.