Ai shouldnt roast France like this.

Rezcore

Rezcore

Well Hewn Timber
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Messages
1,094
Points
153
Screenshot_20250322_034137_Brave.jpg
I spent a while, world building with ai assistance. And the fucking roasted France.
 
P

Placeholder

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2022
Messages
464
Points
133
Imagery that goes back to France not buying Bush Jr/Powell's bullshit that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction", and that the US's allies had to invade Iraq because certain Saudis had funded terrorist training camps in Afghanistan who then did the 9/11 attacks. I think.
 
Sabruness

Sabruness

Cultured Yuri Connoisseur
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
940
Points
133
considering the wackiness in the world lately, i could believe that's actually a (remote) possibility of happening.
 
P

Placeholder

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2022
Messages
464
Points
133
>Freedom fries was a politically motivated renaming of french fries in the United States. The term was coined in February 2003 in a North Carolina restaurant, and was widely publicized a month later when the then Republican Chairman of the Committee on House Administration, Bob Ney, renamed the menu item in three Congressional cafeterias. The political renaming occurred in context of France's opposition to the proposed invasion of Iraq. Although some restaurants around the nation adopted the renaming, the term became unpopular, in part due to decreasing popularity of the Iraq War. After Ney's resignation as Chairman in 2006, the change of name in congressional cafeterias was reverted

en.m.wikipedia.org

Freedom fries - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org

---


> In 2004 and 2005 Colin Powell acknowledged that much of his 2003 UN presentation was inaccurate:

>> I looked at the four [sources] that [the CIA] gave me for [the mobile bio-labs], and they stood behind them, ... Now it appears not to be the case that it was that solid. At the time I was preparing the presentation, it was presented to me as being solid.[12] April 3, 2004

>> I feel terrible ... [giving the speech] ... It's a blot. I'm the one who presented it on behalf of the United States to the world, and [it] will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It's painful now.[13] Sep 8, 2005



en.m.wikipedia.org

United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org

---

The core issue was the US political right-wing's deliberate conflating of Iraq with Afghanistan/ Al-Qaeda as "the people that did 9/11".
 
ElijahRyne

ElijahRyne

A Hermit that’s NOT that Lazy, currentlycomplainen
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Messages
1,837
Points
153
JayMark80 said:
This is a serious Mooter! Experts Assemble!


@anonjohn20 Expert on Cheese
@AmbreaTaddy Expert on France
@Kiuisuke.Kenzaki Expert on AI
@Tempokai Expert on Roasting
@ElijahRyne Expert on Economics and Winning
Click to expand...
@JayMark80 not really an economics expert, but having folks go back to using a commodity as currency would mess up nearly everything. Especially since it isn’t a currency backed by cheese, but a currency of cheese. A currency backed by cheese would essentially be a cheese standard instead of a gold standard. A currency of cheese, if you ignore the impracticality, would essentially be going back to when we were using gold and silver to trade directly.

You might think that is an unimportant distinction, but what happens if there is a shortage or over abundance of cheese? Since it is a perishable good, what happens to peoples savings when the cheese spoils? What will happen if an animal, like a mouse or rat, gets into your savings? How will, if they do at all, the government back up your savings to prevent bank runs?

All of these are somewhat addressable with a fiat or backed currency, but not with a direct cheese one. Ask an actual economist if you want a better or clearer explanation.
 
D

Deleted member 84247

Guest
ElijahRyne said:
@JayMark80 not really an economics expert, but having folks go back to using a commodity as currency would mess up nearly everything. Especially since it isn’t a currency backed by cheese, but a currency of cheese. A currency backed by cheese would essentially be a cheese standard instead of a gold standard. A currency of cheese, if you ignore the impracticality, would essentially be going back to when we were using gold and silver to trade directly.

You might think that is an unimportant distinction, but what happens if there is a shortage or over abundance of cheese? Since it is a perishable good, what happens to peoples savings when the cheese spoils? What will happen if an animal, like a mouse or rat, gets into your savings? How will, if they do at all, the government back up your savings to prevent bank runs?

All of these are somewhat addressable with a fiat or backed currency, but not with a direct cheese one. Ask an actual economist if you want a better or clearer explanation.
Click to expand...
Money should be backed by blood, so that way there will be more blood banks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top