SilvCrimBlac
A Historical Bastard
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2019
- Messages
- 332
- Points
- 103
Lol okay. Sure.And you act like it's a Herculean effort to look for The Caretaker on YouTube and copy a link. It's just a video man, chill.
And....are you sure? Paraphrase? So I paraphrased the very thing you've said twice now that you didn't say? Or at least once.
I said: "So tentacle-horror was relevant and integral to his racism. Wild and crazy horror is somehow relevant to "them blacks". "
You said: "I never once made parallels between "them blacks" and tentacle monsters, the fuck?"
I said: "So, minus all the extra words you used to say the same thing more than once, you did in general, say his tentacle horror was brought about by his racist paranoia against "them blacks" if you shorten it and drop all the useless fluff in your statement. His mental issues just enhanced the literary outcome." (Which is literally making parallels)
You said: "Then I don't know what the hell we're banting about. You just paraphrased me. What's the problem here?"
Lol. You "didn't make parallels. But now you did? Make your mind up. I think you need to listen to that vid more than me.
Lol nice.The post looks cringe to some because it's an attempt at throwing loose connection leaning completely towards intuitive random perception like brain vomit. It completely throws rigorous sorting of the thoughts which can look immature for people who likes polishing and cleaning up concrete data because it's something they would be able to do as babies with eyes closed.
There's no need to be mad, you can let them do their job vomitting ideas and find something valuable on their own, and encourage them to form clean concrete fact based thesis afterwards ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Last edited: