Do you prefer more detail, or less detail when it comes to the environment in a story.

[Worthy39]

I know some people prefer the whole thing filled in for them to imagine, but I also know there are some readers I've met who prefer just the basic outline of the environment, and like to fill the rest in themselves. Which category do you fall in?

 

[BearlyAlive]

Just enough details to know what's going on. No need to describe the environment for paragraphs only to go "but that wasn't important since MC is going somewhere else". Unless you're writing meta narrative and and want to annoy the readers into commenting.

 

[TheNonexistentOne]

More details... Because.. nowadays moderate details count as more details

I know some people prefer the whole thing filled in for them to imagine, but I also know there are some readers I've met who prefer just the basic outline of the environment, and like to fill the rest in themselves. Which category do you fall in?

Somewhere In-between

 

[melcastanet]

Well, it also depends on the pacing of your scene. A fight is less likely to require that detailed a description of the scenery than a stroll by the forest.

 

[Makimaam]

Depends. I treat the environment as a character. If I don’t need it, I leave it out. If it serves the plot or the narrative, I will go at length to write about it.

 

[Lysander_Works]

More detail is good. The problem most make with this advice however is i how it is incorporated. The info should expanse over time with plot and dialogue in a balanced manner, not to be info dumped in one big bracket. That's the hard part.

 

[ConansWitchBaby]

People really forgetting that imagination is supposed to carry.

 

[Liam07N09]

Mild details, overcrowding with words would only make the scene bland unless you can polish the flow

 

[strayCat0]

It fully depends on the writer

 

[ShrimpShady]

I believe that the setting only exists insofar as it's relevant to the story. If the setting matters (e.g. is where most of the story takes place, sets the tone, or is otherwise interesting), then I'd be interested to know more about it. If it doesn't matter, then I don't need to hear about it.

Of course this also depends on whether or not the writer's good at writing (or not writing) setting descriptions

 

[Cookiez_N_Potionz]

I've been having this same problem with detail or not having detail in the right places.

 

[SoullessDiaz]

I enjoy a balance. One where I can tell what am I meant to imagine, but at the same time allows me to fill in the details.

 

[Eldoria]

The environment isn't just a setting; it's the atmosphere of a scene. By using the environment as atmosphere, you can manipulate the reader's mood regarding the situation the characters are facing in a scene. So, they might immerse themselves in the scene. For example,

Corpses, blood, broken swords, and the scorching sunlight on a battlefield depict the brutal and tragic circumstances of war.

Trash, rats, sewage, and dim lighting in an alleyway depict a gloomy and squalid situation.

The sound of crickets, a gentle breeze, moonlight, and ripples on the lake's surface convey silence and a tendency toward melancholy.

The texture (detail) of your environment will determine how readers perceive the atmosphere of a scene. Treat the environment as an additional character involved in a scene. It will make your scene feel more alive.

The question shouldn't be how detailed or undetailed the environment is, but how detail of the environment can build atmosphere within a scene to influence the reader's mood?

 

[CharlesEBrown]

General details should be "front-loaded" and only details important to the scene mentioned later.

One author who did this well at first but lost it over time (likely due to the brain illness that eventually killed him) was Robert Jordan in the Wheel of Time series - you could almost taste and hear the setting, and knew (better than the casting director at Amazon in many cases) generally what his characters looked like... In the first two books, I was in awe of his ability to describe scenes and wished I could do that... but by the third book I was wishing he had my limited ability to paint the picture, so to speak, so that it wouldn't take up so much of the text, especially when he'd already detailed some sections in depth.

 

[worldismyne]

For fantasy, heavy detail. For modern day slice-of-life, light detail. It's all about what the characters care about and what the reader has baseline knowledge about. I've actually had to go back in a few places and describe an object instead of using the correct term for it in order for the scene to work for my editors.

 

[AmiRose]

I know some people prefer the whole thing filled in for them to imagine, but I also know there are some readers I've met who prefer just the basic outline of the environment, and like to fill the rest in themselves. Which category do you fall in?

Moar Detail is always better.
Especially when it's spicy. ^,.,^

 

[DarkCrinkle]

Depends if it's essential... for me reading a wall of text hurts my eyes idk why myb its my low attention span getting bad? So I prefer shorter paragraphs with the right amount of details... not overly exaggerated descriptions of a singular object

 

[AdiofBali]

Bruh, I want MAX detail. Give me all that vibes while telling me what the characters are doing at the same time.
Just don't go overboard and decide that it's a good idea to drop me into season 5 episode 14 of your novel's story like Garden of the Moon or something. Keep it in check, k.

Moar Detail is always better.
Especially when it's spicy. ^,.,^

Well, the Original Cut of my novel got plenty of both. Dunno if you wanna read something that's written in present tense and have dialogue tags like visual novels tho.

 

[AmiRose]

Well, the Original Cut of my novel got plenty of both. Dunno if you wanna read something that's written in present tense and have dialogue tags like visual novels tho.

I gets dat you're tryin ta promote your stuff, but there is a time an a place for it.
You also didn't have ta quote me ta do that either.
It comes across as kinda pushy an more than a lil desperate, which is bad for optics and PR stuffs and doesn't actually make me wanna read it.

Maybe next time, instead of doin that, show some confidence in your work and share how it is actually related to the discussion at hand, or how you went and did whatever the discussion topic is about. If ya actually did it, I mean. I can't say whether ya dids or not, cuz I'm not readin it.

Dis will be the last I say on this too, and won't be discussin my likes as a reader here either, beyond what I already said bout likin moar details over less, cuz none of it is relevant to the topic.

Dat's all for my soapbox rant. laterz.
Wan.

 

[AdiofBali]

I gets dat you're tryin ta promote your stuff, but there is a time an a place for it.
You also didn't have ta quote me ta do that either.
It comes across as kinda pushy an more than a lil desperate, which is bad for optics and PR stuffs and doesn't actually make me wanna read it.

Maybe next time, instead of doin that, show some confidence in your work and share how it is actually related to the discussion at hand, or how you went and did whatever the discussion topic is about. If ya actually did it, I mean. I can't say whether ya dids or not, cuz I'm not readin it.

Dis will be the last I say on this too, and won't be discussin my likes as a reader here either, beyond what I already said bout likin moar details over less, cuz none of it is relevant to the topic.
View attachment 49432
Dat's all for my soapbox rant. laterz.
Wan.

"Moar Detail is always better.
Especially when it's spicy. ^,.,^"

A version of my novel has both of those things. Dunno if you'd like it tho.

*Gets mad*

http://imgur.com/9rxFKcs