Sympathetic villains. Why does every villain nowadays need to be redeemable? Why can't we have more glorious bastards we love to hate? They always spoil the mood by having a tragic backstory they need to spill just when things are getting good.
Because I can’t manage to write about someone I truly hate… ?
He can and had intervened- such as raising people from the dead, causing the rotation of the earth to stop for a day while Israelites wage war, and is legally entitled to because he still owns the universe.
But he cannot mind-control or influence our choices, leading to the only way to get rid of evil being the end judgement. That's somewhat offtopic, but I enjoyed reading the answer, so I thought I'd comment on it :3.
I think this is also why so many stories need a Big Bad who has arguably more influence over characters than the Holy One. For example, devil characters can express hedonism, free will corrupted, and a stance that shows Why the Creator may limit interference. For example, when the Good interferes, so can the Evil. Etc etc. Evil is more easily apparent in human societies and can become really morally interesting.
New pet peeve: when devils are the good guys and angels are bad because he’s a rebel and I wanna date him. It’s so cliche at this point.
I get the others, but why amnesia stuff?
For me, because it usually means all the character development beforehand was for nothing. Or, alternatively that now they are interacting with a “clean slate” that acts like a completely new character. It can lead to yucky stuff like “you were always hot but too stubborn. Now that you lost your independence and rely on me for everything, I totally love you.”