What's your opinion on making up new words?

ThisAdamGuy

Proud inventor of the chocolate onion
Joined
Sep 4, 2024
Messages
1,010
Points
128
First of all, I'm not talking about inventing words for things that don't exist on earth. I'm talking about inventing new words just to use in narration or casual conversation. I heard once that as long as other people understand what a word means, then there's no reason not to use it. Just a minute ago, I wrote this sentence: "'There's more here if you need it,' she said, holding the pitcher up offeringly," and I was surprised to see that "offeringly" isn't a real word. But I feel like the word is clear enough that nobody is going to be confused as to what it means, so even if the dictionary doesn't recognize it, I may as well use it anyway.

What do you guys think? Not about my example specifically, but about making up new words in general?
 

Hoshino

Hoshino not found
Joined
Dec 23, 2024
Messages
1,008
Points
128
There is a thing called free will.You do what you want.Its such a nice and beautiful thing. And more of all its free!


*You tell “ThisAdamGuy” that its okay to make your own words.

*You tell him that when words like Exumentivalication exist then why not?
 

Tyranomaster

Guy who writes stuff
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Messages
746
Points
133
I've made up a few words along the way. They need to make sense and have a purpose though. If you invent a new device, giving it a catchy name is far better than a long description every time it's used.

Basically, only use created words when not using them is very clunky, and it's obvious to the reader what that word is. Otherwise, you just overload readers with meaningless jargon. Exceptions can be made for one off jokes etc (think Death Sticks in star wars).
 

Daydreamers

ⴼⵓⴰⴷ ⵃⴰⵊⴰⵣⵉ
Joined
Dec 23, 2024
Messages
289
Points
93
1737394764180.png

This is just a coincidence I swear , I was reading this book and well I guess The author is saying hi
 

ThisAdamGuy

Proud inventor of the chocolate onion
Joined
Sep 4, 2024
Messages
1,010
Points
128
View attachment 35076
This is just a coincidence I swear , I was reading this book and well I guess The author is saying hi
I don't think that using "offeringly" is the same kind of issue as mixing up "incredible" and "incredulous." Both of those are words that already exist and have distinct meanings. "Offeringly" is using a suffix to create an adverb out of a word that everyone already knows as a way to describe a character's actions. She doesn't outright say "Do you want me to pour you a drink?", but everyone knows that's what she's doing because of the way she holds the pitcher out toward the MC.
 

Daydreamers

ⴼⵓⴰⴷ ⵃⴰⵊⴰⵣⵉ
Joined
Dec 23, 2024
Messages
289
Points
93
I don't think that using "offeringly" is the same kind of issue as mixing up "incredible" and "incredulous." Both of those are words that already exist and have distinct meanings. "Offeringly" is using a suffix to create an adverb out of a word that everyone already knows as a way to describe a character's actions. She doesn't outright say "Do you want me to pour you a drink?", but everyone knows that's what she's doing because of the way she holds the pitcher out toward the MC.
I know, there is a limit to a coincidence, if it is exactly describing what you mentioned then chances are it is not one
 

laccoff_mawning

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Messages
493
Points
133
If I were reading it, I wouldn't bat an eyelid at "offeringly".

The problem is, if some linguist expert comes along and gives a reason why "offeringly" isn't a word, then RIP you I guess. In that thought I guess I'd try to avoid it if possible, just in case.

Oh man, If you told me offeringly was a word, I'd believe you 100%. I'm surprised its not a word.
 

CharlesEBrown

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Messages
4,750
Points
158
Let's see - "Offer" can be a noun or a verb.
Same for "Offering"
So if you do something in the manner of an offering, I suppose it would be "offeringly" - and that kind of clause addition is an element of the German language, as well as parts of the English language.
According to a former roommate (a linguistics minor), a word comes into existence when at least three different people use it in the same context, and that has been a core element of the English Language pretty much since at least the Norman Invasion.
My History of the English Language teacher was a bit less liberal with word origins, claiming that whenever English needed a new word, we just borrowed it from someone else, and really created nothing, being more a synthesis language.

Then again, Automata Theory, which is the root of all language and mathematics, just has all concepts building on everything that came before - so adding an "ly" to an existing word should always be valid.

So, make the meaning clear and you should be fine, unless my History of the English Language professor is reading and decides to read it umberagely.

As an aside, "ain't" IS a word, technically speaking, but it is not used correctly - it is officially a contraction of "I am not" - so "Ain't gonna do that" is technically valid - but "I ain't going there" is redundant, and "you ain't just whistling Dixie" is technically completely incorrect.
 

RepresentingThree

Pedagogical Cannibalism?
Joined
Jun 20, 2020
Messages
242
Points
103
All words are made up. Except s̶̡̧̱͓͈̹̓̉̎̀͂͆̀h̷̘͔͇̹̥͚̭͕̹̖̘̱̲͈͑̎̋͠ṁ̶͍͖͍́ͅe̴̢̛̫̣̳̰̮̤̝̣̳̼̍̀̈́̈̓̀̔̏̊̕͜͝b̶̛̛̗͚̫̥̝̳͍͍͚̥̟̀̀̑̎̿͋͌͝ͅͅű̷̧͚̫͇̤̗͉̖̖̐̀̈̊̿͑̃͗̔͜͝l̷̜̭̤͙̭̟͐͜ô̷̢̲̲̙̦͕͇̙̞͒̆̽̓c̵̡̢̳͚͇̺̮͎̼͚͊́k̶̢̡̡̤̠̭͙̦͈͉̺̭̀̓͐͋͊̾͊̽͌̚͜͝͝. It was planted.
 

istryj

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 29, 2024
Messages
112
Points
58
A dictionary only contains words that are in current use, not every possible variation. Creating understandable words is based on the rules of the language; whether or not to use such words, in my opinion, is a personal choice. I might be mistaken about the original text, but the Russian translation of Lewis Carroll’s Alice included these kinds of words. That’s if you need a precedent.
 
Top