Moonlit_Quill
New member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2025
- Messages
- 15
- Points
- 3
Hey guys,
I just started posting my novel Crown of Ash and Bonds here on SH. It’s basically messy romance + betrayal + magic + politics all rolled into one. If you like characters making terrible choices for love/revenge, it might be your thing.
I’m looking for honest feedback (flow, pacing, whatever stands out to you), and I’ll happily check out your story in return. Not just a “like for like” but actual comments/reactions what grabbed me, what confused me, etc.
Here’s mine: [https://www.scribblehub.com/series/1694966/crown-of-ash-and-bonds-the-rise-of-the-flamebearer/]
Drop your links below if you’re down for a swap. Let’s help each other grow (and maybe cry over our characters together ?).
CG Blaire
Update:
For transparency, I checked the review I wrote (the one I was accused of “cheating” with AI, because they didn't like what I said about their novel) using two independent detectors, to prove a point since they like AI detectors a lot (see attached images). After a heated back-and-forth in this thread, where they implied I apologize and admit to AI use, one of their readers (I traced back to their own reader's list) retaliated with a demolition 1-star review on my work, calling it "crap and AI sludge" before disabling their account:
Justdone AI flagged the review as 0% AI (fully human).
isGPT flagged the review at 0.06% probability and explicitly stated it was written by humans.
Context from benchmark findings:
• isGPT performs strongest on academic essays and literature reviews (over 90% accuracy in detecting real human writing). Reviews fall under this category, which makes its assessment more relevant.
• GPTZero performs better on SEO and blog-style content.
• Justdone AI is less consistent on structured text, but in this case it also flagged my review as entirely human.
I have reported the suspicious accounts/persons involved in harassing me, and will leave the matter to the moderators.
If you decide to use AI in your work and your reader calls you out because it's obvious enough that you admit it, that's fine. But don't project onto others who don't use AI for their writing.
AI detector links or screenshots are not reliable proof of authorship on their own. They can be misused, and weaponizing them against authors risks unfairly smearing people’s work.
I will continue focusing on reading and reviewing constructively, and I hope the same courtesy is extended to everyone here.
I just started posting my novel Crown of Ash and Bonds here on SH. It’s basically messy romance + betrayal + magic + politics all rolled into one. If you like characters making terrible choices for love/revenge, it might be your thing.
I’m looking for honest feedback (flow, pacing, whatever stands out to you), and I’ll happily check out your story in return. Not just a “like for like” but actual comments/reactions what grabbed me, what confused me, etc.
Here’s mine: [https://www.scribblehub.com/series/1694966/crown-of-ash-and-bonds-the-rise-of-the-flamebearer/]
Drop your links below if you’re down for a swap. Let’s help each other grow (and maybe cry over our characters together ?).
CG Blaire
Update:
For transparency, I checked the review I wrote (the one I was accused of “cheating” with AI, because they didn't like what I said about their novel) using two independent detectors, to prove a point since they like AI detectors a lot (see attached images). After a heated back-and-forth in this thread, where they implied I apologize and admit to AI use, one of their readers (I traced back to their own reader's list) retaliated with a demolition 1-star review on my work, calling it "crap and AI sludge" before disabling their account:
Justdone AI flagged the review as 0% AI (fully human).
isGPT flagged the review at 0.06% probability and explicitly stated it was written by humans.
Context from benchmark findings:
• isGPT performs strongest on academic essays and literature reviews (over 90% accuracy in detecting real human writing). Reviews fall under this category, which makes its assessment more relevant.
• GPTZero performs better on SEO and blog-style content.
• Justdone AI is less consistent on structured text, but in this case it also flagged my review as entirely human.
I have reported the suspicious accounts/persons involved in harassing me, and will leave the matter to the moderators.
If you decide to use AI in your work and your reader calls you out because it's obvious enough that you admit it, that's fine. But don't project onto others who don't use AI for their writing.
AI detector links or screenshots are not reliable proof of authorship on their own. They can be misused, and weaponizing them against authors risks unfairly smearing people’s work.
I will continue focusing on reading and reviewing constructively, and I hope the same courtesy is extended to everyone here.
Attachments
Last edited: