Tsuru
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2019
- Messages
- 1,443
- Points
- 153
A time or two I have come across this situation in reading stories:
"A male character in a book who is described as a guy looking like another guy someone in the story knows, but then is said to be androgynous and having mistaken that particular man for the man they know."
To simplify the fact the this above person has mistaken one man for another man feels like an incorrect way to use the word. The problem being androgynous is a word defined to describe a man who looks like a woman or a woman who looks like a man. Shouldn't this kind of issue be described differently?
Isn't androgynous about people not looking male not female? It's the word to describe someone who looks like they're in-between, no?
Indeed it should. Androgynous does indeed mean that someone looks like they could be either way. tomboy with small breasts, short hair, and wearing pants (in a situation where women would be wearing skirts, such as school anime) would be androgynous. A man looking like a different man would be closer to doppleganger than androgynous.