SmutHub: Real or Not?

[Aaqil]

@SailusGebel I thought Comrade is gender natural. Noted; Princess of Princesses.

@Aaqil I am in central Europe, GMT+2. For the 2nd route, I take random hours every day for more diversity.

 

[Corty]

Round 2

Looking at the Latest Updates
Day 6 - September 4​

Spoiler: Latest 25 Updates

• Harem: 5 out of 25 = 20%
• Smut: 5 out of 25 = 20%

 

[Corty]

Round 2

Looking at the Latest Updates
Day 7 - September 5​

Spoiler: Latest 25 Updates

• Harem: 7 out of 25 = 28%
• Smut: 4 out of 25 = 16%

Round 2
The 2nd Conclusion​

• Harem: 44 out of 175 = 25.14%
• Smut: 35 out of 175 = 20%

Spoiler: My opinion

Once again, we end a week where we can see that harem and smut are something that is not running rampant here. In reality, the numbers are even lower as three out of five times, harem and smut belong to one book and are not representative of two books. That's it, folks; I'm stopping it here for now! It was fun to see it, and I hope Princess @SailusGebel manages to bring the Smutgeddon a step closer to us so we can bask in its unholy fire sooner.

 

[Bobple]

Congrats on completing it

 

[AliceShiki]

Thanks for all the hard work~

 

[dummycake]

latest updates 5th of september 6pm

 

[RepresentingWrath]

View attachment 21663

latest updates 5th of september 6pm

 

[greyblob]

based harem enjoyers

 

[dummycake]

where

 

[RepresentingWrath]

where

This reply alone earned you a unique, one of a kind award. You have the honor of becoming the first and the last person on my block list.

 

[dummycake]

This reply alone earned you a unique, one of a kind award. You have the honor of becoming the first and the last person on my block list.

???

 

[Erios909]

definitely smut hub

 

[Deleted member 84247]

definitely smut hub

Argument from authority? I believe you!

 

[RepresentingWrath]

Argument from authority? I believe you!

Nah, Erios909 only baits everyone with girls.

 

[Deleted member 84247]

Nah, Erios909 only baits everyone with girls.

I have it on my reading list, but I haven't started yet. Are you telling me that the sexual content warning and GL subplot are lies!?

 

[RepresentingWrath]

I have it on my reading list, but I haven't started yet. Are you telling me that the sexual content warning and GL subplot are lies!?

How the hell should I know? I've only read a couple of chapters.

 

[Deleted member 84247]

How the hell should I know? I've only read a couple of chapters.

Deceiver!

 

[Erios909]

I have it on my reading list, but I haven't started yet. Are you telling me that the sexual content warning and GL subplot are lies!?

Does take a while to show up... like... 120 chapters-ish

 

[RepresentingThree]

Maybe it's just really noticeable for me. I don't like smut, and I've run into books with a cool premise only to be turned away by its sexual content. It's happened so much that sometimes I'll end up reading it anyway because I like the idea. I can't skip those chapters when they could have information about the story, and frankly, it's rude to do so. That being said if there are twenty-five books on a single search page, and you have no tags selected there are 815 tabs and 20375 books. Smut has only 98 pages and 2450 books. It's just a red flag and sticks out. @Corty

 

[J_Chemist]

Alright, it might just be a meme BUT HEAR ME OUT. I HAVE A SOURCE.

obligatory tag @doravg