Should Dragons have rights?

[Deleted member 113259]

Woo 8 pages, and the thread still hasn't been locked despite the politics.

 

[Deleted member 84247]

There was already a thread about climate change. What the fuck happened to the thread about dragon rights? Bruh.

 

[Deleted member 113259]

There was already a thread about climate change. What the fuck happened to the thread about dragon rights? Bruh.

This is why we can't have nice things.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

And you just picked one of my examples apart without regard for the other ones. Land erosion isn't even the single factor for floods. Irregular rains are, too. And guess what causes them? That's right, climate change.

Vietnam has monsoons dude, i doubt the are only ever getting worse. More likely they are on an oscillating cycle.

There was already a thread about climate change. What the fuck happened to the thread about dragon rights? Bruh.

Atheists happened.

 

[APieceOfRock]

It wasn't energy turning into mass, it was providing enough energy for more subatomic particles to gather to form larger atoms.

You do realise that's how energy turn into mass, right? Actually, mass IS energy. When people say turning energy into mass, they mean to turn it into one of the four states.

Vietnam has monsoons dude, i doubt the are only ever getting worse. More likely they are on an oscillating cycle.

There you go. Monsoons. Not air that changes very slowly over years. It SHOULD come full circle after a year, but it's only getting worse with each year.

Honestly, live anywhere but your first world country for a few years. See if you can deny climate change

 

[Deleted member 84247]

Atheists happened.

I didn't say anything about climate change.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

You do realise that's how energy turn into mass, right? Actually, mass IS energy. When people say turning energy into mass, they mean to turn it into one of the four states.

There is actually a method to create mass from energy alone. I think it was done in the hadron collider?

That's not what I am talking about.
I'm talking about moving existing mass around.

I didn't say anything about climate change.

I didn't say you did.

 

[Deleted member 113259]

I didn't say you did.

Yeah, but you implied it was atheism that was the problem here and not people that wanted to start annoying political discourse.

 

[APieceOfRock]

That's not what I am talking about.
I'm talking about moving existing mass around.

Wow, so you're smushing matters together and expect to make Uranium?

Someone didn't pay attention to chemistry classes. That would need you to change the amount of P and E in atoms. And doing so would, surprise suprise, create radiation.
Earth would be a radioactive mess if what you're saying is true

Look, you're clearly bending scientific facts to fit into your religion. It'll be impossible to change your mind however much evidence I provide.
Goodnight

Yeah, but you implied it was atheism that was the problem here and not people that wanted to start annoying political discourse.

In case you're talking about me, I'm not discussing politics. I'm talking science. Politicians made science into politics, not the other way around.

If not then ignore this comment

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

Yeah but you implied it was atheism that was the problem here and not people that wanted to start annoying political discourse.

It started with an athiest attempting to use climate change propaganda to disprove the bible.

 

[Deleted member 76176]

Woo 8 pages, and the thread still hasn't been locked despite the politics.

I've reported this thread long before, so it's up to site mods now.

 

[AnonUnlimited]

I think a better question is whether Dragon's exist or not.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

Wow, so you're smushing matters together and expect to make Uranium?

Someone didn't pay attention to chemistry classes. That would need you to change the amount of P and E in atoms. And doing so would, surprise suprise, create radiation.
Earth would be a radioactive mess if what you're saying is true

Well the energy went into creating a lot of high energy sources, some of which are radioactive. Most aren't, like petroleum.

Also notice: i have not been personally attacking you.

 

[AnonUnlimited]

Wow... Didn't realize this topic about dragons turned into another climate change rant...

There is no science that proves Climate change is man-made. There is extrapolated evidence... which is inconclusive and can go either way... but mathematically...

If it is man-made.
It's the fault of the WEF, and the progressives, EU and current liberals who are doing absolutely nothing about the forests but clamoring constantly about how we should buy electric vehicles that basically use the same energy output as a gas vehicle and thus put out about the same amount of CO2.

In before lock.

 

[Deleted member 113259]

I wanted to call @Reinaislost a narc but there's no saving this thread. She made the right call.

 

[APieceOfRock]

Well the energy went into creating a lot of high energy sources, some of which are radioactive. Most aren't, like petroleum.

Welp, one last thing. Look up what radiation actually is. Combined with he fact that you need to shoot out and add protons to turn matters into other things and you got your answer.

 

[AnonUnlimited]

I wanted to call @Reinaislost a narc but there's no saving this thread. She made the right call.

Congrats on starting another thread that should be locked.

 

[Deleted member 113259]

Congrats on starting another thread that should be locked.

Wait, what was my first one?

 

[AnonUnlimited]

Wait, what was my first one?

Dunno, just sounded like a cool thing to say in the moment.
Since I don't believe dragons have rights.

 

[Placeholder]

I'm more concerned about their greenhouse-gas claims than their uranium claims.


> "Carbon dioxide is Earth’s most important greenhouse gas: a gas that absorbs and radiates heat. Unlike oxygen or nitrogen (which make up most of our atmosphere), greenhouse gases absorb heat radiating from the Earth’s surface and re-release it in all directions—including back toward Earth’s surface."

http://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide#:~:text=Carbon%20dioxide%20is%20Earth%E2%80%99s%20most%20important%20greenhouse%20gas%3A%C2%A0a%20gas%20that%20absorbs%20and%20radiates%20heat.%20Unlike%20oxygen%20or%20nitrogen%20(which%20make%20up%20most%20of%20our%20atmosphere)%2C%C2%A0greenhouse%20gases%20absorb%20heat%20radiating%20from%20the%20Earth%E2%80%99s%20surface%20and%20re%2Drelease%20it%20in%20all%20directions%E2%80%94including%20back%20toward%20Earth%E2%80%99s%20surface.

There is no science that proves Climate change is man-made

"Carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is now reaching levels 50% higher than when humanity began large-scale burning of fossil fuels during the industrial revolution. "

https://www.carbonbrief.org/met-off...hitting-50-higher-than-pre-industrial-levels/ (UK gov met office)


Further reading:

Scientists deliver ‘final warning’ on climate crisis: act now or it’s too late

IPCC report says only swift and drastic action can avert irrevocable damage to world

www.theguardian.com