RoyalRoad- aka Censorship Road

Status
Not open for further replies.

RepresentingWrath

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
13,556
Points
283
Its pretty simple.

My cover art got my submission rejected on RR for being "incredibly sexual" despite the fact shes fulky covered with no skin showing below the neck, right? She was wearing a form fitting space suit and she was a curvy girl who may be a little overweight, but not enough to be chubby or fat. (It was approved without issue here on SH).

The space suit was similar to the space suits in Gundam Wing ect. Form fitting. Very much like a scuba diver suit actually.

Then Muffin said the image was sexual.

Which is projection. Doesn't mean I think hes a pervert or a bad person. Just means he was attributing an internal thought or feeling to something outside of he-himself. In this case, I didnt make the image with that intention, and aside from the fact other people find her body shape to be sexy, it wasn't meant to be sexual by nature.

Muffin then accused me of making a personal attack, which immediately made me disengage from further conversation on the topic because we arent going to agree, and he's making it out like I was harassing him when I was just saying what any Psych 101 professor or student would say. Its projection. That isnt a bad thing per say, its more like a logical fallacy in a certain sense.

Then Anon decided to make a big deal about it, even though I said I was done with the topic already, and he accused me of bullying and harassment and all this other stuff. All because I said that Muffin's statement and statements after it were projection. It is really dumb. I kept saying "Lets just agree to disagree" but these guys would not let it drop. lol.

Then Star Knight posted a snarky post insinuating that my character was in a body suit (kind of true) and he left a bunch of angry reacts on my actual forum posts. So I went and posted a response like: Women wear body suits/onesies (not the fetish kind) where I live and its not sexual. Then a lot of other people posted and made a few snarky comments in the status itself. Personally I think its more like a scuba suit myself. Is a scuba suit a bodysuit? Kinda. Not sexual tho.

So now its kind of like...its a 3 vs 1, 5 vs 1 at this point, and while all this is going on Anon keeps accusing me in his forum posts of bullying and harassing and blah blah; while all these people are ganging up on me. lol. Its so stupid. If anything Im the one being bullied.

And I got called "insufferable" multiple times by multiple people. ?

Like holy shit. I think its projection. I think the act of finding it to be sexy and then projecting that onto the image itself is projection. Right. If I wore a scuba suit for its intended purpose in rl, would that make me 'sexual' just because someone thought that? Or thought it was sexy? Or saw the potential for it to be seen as being sexy. lol. No.

But I dont think that makes someone projecting like that a bad person. Its just a fault in their logic.

I just wanted to agree to disagree the whole time so the thread could go back to the RR topic rather than being derailed for pages and pages and pages.

I dont think Muffin or Anon are bad people. But they think I am, apparently.

Thats what alllll of this was about.
I am not trolling when I say this. I still don't get sexual part. But I do get everything else.

Just in case, don't think that SHF(scribble hub forums) and SH(scribble hub, main site) are the same. People from forums won't follow you to your novel to downvote or harass you, we are no RR. There are a couple of kids, they are underage forums users that might do it for 'fun' but you can ask the site owner, Tony, to remove those ratings. Back to forum fights. Usually what starts here stays here. That's about all I wanted to say.
 

Iloveshovels

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
121
Points
78
Dunno, the admins hate me. Not my fault the author was literally eluding to slime girls ‘stuff’. I just said it.

That’s how I can’t use the forums. But, I sorta get it, RR wants to get snooty with business.

But, rip.
 

RedMuffin

OwO
Joined
May 6, 2024
Messages
997
Points
108
I agree that cover shows no nipples, no genitals, and no explicit intercourse.

So please, get my cover approved too ?https://forum.scribblehub.com/threads/is-this-cover-too-degenerate.20905/
images (14).jpeg


I dont think Muffin or Anon are bad people. But they think I am, apparently.
Just to clarify, we don't think you're a bad person either.

I won't talk about the rest of the post since it's apparent that there's still some misunderstanding about me projecting and so on.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2024
Messages
66
Points
18
View attachment 34263


Just to clarify, we don't think you're a bad person either.

I won't talk about the rest of the post since it's apparent that there's still some misunderstanding about me projecting and so on.
Okay,

What is the missunderstanding? Im willing to at least hear the specifics of that again. Maybe I did missunderstand something? I dont think I did, but I am at least willing to hear a second or a third explanation of it just to be 100% sure.

I think I know what you're going to say, but Im willing to wait and see, first. lol.
 

Clo

nya nya~
Joined
Mar 5, 2020
Messages
450
Points
133
Sexy = Broad allure
Sexually attractive = Want to f***
Sexual = Want to f***
Sexual, I would actually say that it involves (and here's the tricky part) or suggests actual or imminent fucking (or fucking-adjacent activities)

A passionate make-out session isn't inherently sexual, but if someone's belt is undone and there's a hand in their pants, I think it's starting to become clearer.

Obviously, everyone's "line in the sand" will land at vastly different places, depending on openness, culture, age, art style, and so on.

I really don't see how the cover picture involved here landed on the "it's too much" side of things, but I am fairly sure that there are people on this world who do think it goes too far.

It's just that these people are even touchier about it than I am, and I know I am rather strongly conservative myself. It's challenging for me to picture someone even further on that spectrum than myself, but not unthinkable.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2024
Messages
66
Points
18
Excuse me for being stupid. Is sexy or sexually attractive the same as sexual?
No its not.

sexual/sĕk′shoo͞-əl/

adjective​

  1. Relating to, involving, or characteristic of sex or sexuality, or the sex organs and their functions.
    "sexual partners; sexual fantasies; sexual dysfunction."
  2. Relating to the sexes or to gender.
    "sexual politics."
  3. Relating to, involving, or being reproduction characterized by the union of male and female gametes.
In this case, we are talking about the base nature of an object, person or concept. Which is why the image isnt inherently sexual in nature.



sexy/sĕk′sē/

adjective​

  1. Arousing or tending to arouse sexual desire or interest.
  2. Highly appealing or interesting; attractive.
  3. Having sexual appeal; suggestive of sex.
It could be seen as being sexy, depending on the preferences of the observer. But thats still not the base nature of the person, object or thing. Thats something the outside observer saw/thought about it.
Sexual = something you can't show in your family gathering without getting a restraining order from parents with underaged kids
No.

Thats inappropriate you're thinking of. The word.

inappropriate/ĭn″ə-prō′prē-ĭt/

adjective​

  1. Unsuitable or improper.
  2. Not instrument (to); not appropriate; unbecoming; unsuitable; not specially fitted; -- followed by to or for
 
Last edited:

AnonUnlimited

????????? (???/???)
Joined
Apr 18, 2022
Messages
4,573
Points
183
I really don't see how the cover picture involved here landed on the "it's too much" side of things, but I am fairly sure that there are people on this world who do think it goes too far.
No one was saying it was too far in any capacity.
Some people found it sexual, some people didn't.
There weren't really any insecurities involved when someone found it sexual, it was just what they found.

The main issue was the person who didn't find it sexual accused the one who did of projecting.
Accusing people of projecting is an attack, and thus there was an argument.
Then the person who attacked wanted to pretend like nothing happened.

For the most part, the original argument had nothing to it.
 

RepresentingWrath

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
13,556
Points
283
No its not.

sexual/sĕk′shoo͞-əl/

adjective​

  1. Relating to, involving, or characteristic of sex or sexuality, or the sex organs and their functions.
    "sexual partners; sexual fantasies; sexual dysfunction."
  2. Relating to the sexes or to gender.
    "sexual politics."
  3. Relating to, involving, or being reproduction characterized by the union of male and female gametes.
In this case, we are talking about the base nature of an object, person or concept. Which is why the image isnt inherently sexual in nature.



sexy/sĕk′sē/

adjective​

  1. Arousing or tending to arouse sexual desire or interest.
  2. Highly appealing or interesting; attractive.
  3. Having sexual appeal; suggestive of sex.
It could be seen as being sexy, depending on the preferences of the observer. But thats still not the base nature of the person, object or thing. Thats something the outside observer saw/thought about it.
If it is true, I think the whole argument grew from people using sexual and sexy interchangeably. I don't know what goes on in RR mods' heads, but I have a feeling some peeps here used it interchangeably. Because the cover is definetely sexy and sexually attractive. Which I think is the problem people pointed out, but I am not sure.
 

AnonUnlimited

????????? (???/???)
Joined
Apr 18, 2022
Messages
4,573
Points
183
If it is true, I think the whole argument grew from people using sexual and sexy interchangeably. I don't know what goes on in RR mods' heads, but I have a feeling some peeps here used it interchangeably. Because the cover is definetely sexy and sexually attractive. Which I think is the problem people pointed out, but I am not sure.
Stop trying to egg this on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top