Picture Effectiveness

[Jayrayme6]

What do you think about the effectiveness of this picture to attract viewers? Click on it to discover my story, a fast-paced progression fantasy with Lazy MC.

( Book 1 Completed) A young arbolarbre (Treeman) called Oak Quercus must stop his carnivorous mad King (Xidor Cedre) from sending his nation into a war to feed his gluttony for flesh and his sudden quest for immortality.

However, he will have to face opposition from his vegetarian countrymen with diverging opinions on how to stop the King's madness.

But before everything, he'll have to find work to make his parents proud.

CLICK IT AND DISCOVER THE STORY​

CLICK THE PICTURE​

 

[Ilikewaterkusa]

Wait. Are you talking about the current thumbnail or the blacksmith image?

 

[Jayrayme6]

Wait. Are you talking about the current thumbnail or the blacksmith image?

The blacksmith picture in itself would be great. As well as the combination of the picture + the text, which is more effective to attract viewers. I don't wanna «force» anyone into clicking it, but I just want to suggest.

 

[Zirrboy]

If this isn't comedy, which seems to be the case according to the tags, this image gives the wrong impression.

 

[Armored99]

If you're looking for a cover try this thread

 

[Lloyd]

Honestly, I tried reading your story awhile ago and i think the main problem is just that it isn't a very appealing story. Like who the fuck has ever said, "You know what, I feel like reading a story about trees." Also you start immediately with exposition, which imo is a classic rookie author mistake. Better to drip feed that sort of stuff since its generally boring unless you've had time to become invested in the world. But yeah, a new cover would probably help too.

 

[Kilolo]

who the fuck has ever said, "You know what, I feel like reading a story about trees."

*profuse sweating

 

[tiaf]

The typography of the picture is a jumbled mess and not appealing at all.

I clicked on the link, but I see several mistakes just opening the novel page.

1. Why is the author name the first thing in the cover? The title has to stand out, the author name is just distracting and confusing since it seems like part of the title.
2. The isekai long ass title is done wrong. The “fast-paced progression fantasy” can be put at the end of the synopsis. That has nothing to do in the title.
3. The “book 1 completed” is very misleading. Is it completely or is it not? I do not need to know if the book is finished written. What I need to know is if book 1 has only has the 9 chapters that are published.

Cannot say anything to the content. But the first impression as a reader wasn’t appealing enough to try it out.