Monster ranking system?

Tempokai

The Overworked One
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Messages
1,395
Points
153
Ah, Woolen_Monkey, the self-proclaimed "Monkey leader" and "Adopted forum son of Envy." It seems like you've stumbled upon the latest and greatest addition to the world of fantasy RPGs – the "Damage Ranking System." Brace yourselves, ladies and gentlemen, for we're about to embark on a journey through the wild world of Monster Rankings, as envisioned by the one and only Monkey Lord.

Now, don't get me wrong; categorizing monsters is a noble endeavor. After all, how else would brave adventurers know whether to unsheathe their swords or take a leisurely stroll through the forest? But this ranking system, oh dear readers, is something else entirely.

First, we've got Rank 1: "Negligible Impact." Ah, yes, because when I think of negligible impact, I immediately think of "Nocturnal Visitors" and "Enigmatic Observers." Truly, the terror of my sleepless nights and the bane of my mysterious evenings. Don't even get me started on those "Seasonal Wanderers" – the horror of seasons changing, right?

Then, we ascend to Rank 2: "Minimal Disruption." Shy Residents? Tolerable Pests? Bordered Intruders? It's like a who's who of creatures you'd invite over for tea, isn't it? "Oh, pardon me, Mr. Shy Resident, would you like another crumpet?" Please, pass the honey.

Rank 3: "Nominal Nuisances." Because what's an adventure without a little trouble, right? "Frequent Troublemakers" are just misunderstood. "Unwelcome Neighbors" are probably just upset about their property taxes. Nothing to see here.

Now, brace yourselves, because at Rank 4, we hit the big leagues: "Moderate Disturbance." Frequent Agitators? Seasonal Pests? Ephemeral Threats? Now, these are the neighbors you call the neighborhood watch on. "Ma'am, I think my azaleas are at risk of being trampled by those Ephemeral Threats again."

Rank 5: "Significant Threat." This is where things start to get real. "Aggressive Invaders" – well, I guess they're not knocking politely. But let's not get carried away; they're still just "Seasonal Menaces." Probably upset about the weather, you know how it is.

Rank 6: "Localized Catastrophe." Now, this is where it gets interesting. "Elemental Rampage," "Cursed Anomalies," and "Natural Outbursts." You might want to consider a vacation when these folks move in next door. But hey, at least they're "Localized." Your neighbors across the county are safe.

Now, folks, things are getting a tad out of hand. Rank 7: "Regional Apocalypse." Catastrophic Outbreaks, Apocalyptic Blights, and Elemental Cataclysms? If you find yourself in this situation, it might be time to call in the big guns – the neighborhood watch, the national guard, and maybe even the Avengers.

But wait, there's more! Rank 8: "Environmental Extinction." Ecosystem Collapse? Regional Obliteration? Existential Devastation? At this point, you're not ranking monsters; you're ranking the stages of your own despair.

So, dear Woolen_Monkey, if your aim was to create a ranking system that confuses more than it clarifies, you've succeeded admirably. But hey, in the chaotic world of fantasy, maybe a little confusion is just what we need. After all, when the "Existential Devastation" comes knocking, who needs clarity anyway? Cheers to your monstrous endeavor, Monkey Leader. May your monsters always be... ranked.

Oh, Woolen_Monkey, you sweet, misguided soul, it's time to dissect your "Damage Ranking System." Brace yourselves, folks, because this is going to be an epic tale of confusion and verbosity.

First off, why are we ranking monsters like they're contestants in a beauty pageant? "Negligible Impact" sounds like a phrase you'd use to describe your aunt's taste in music, not something that strikes fear into the hearts of fantasy adventurers.

And what's with the sub-tiers? Are we organizing a monster-themed tea party? "Nocturnal Visitors" sounds like a bunch of polite vampires dropping by for a cup of Earl Grey. "Enigmatic Observers" might as well be peeping Toms with a taste for mystery novels.

Let's not even get started on "Nominal Nuisances." These monsters are apparently just minor annoyances. I guess they're the equivalent of that neighbor who mows their lawn at 6 AM on a Sunday.

As we climb the ranks, things only get more confusing. "Localized Catastrophe" sounds like a term used by overenthusiastic weather reporters. "Regional Apocalypse" sounds like a disaster-themed cooking show. And "Environmental Extinction" is just... well, that's just depressing.

So, Woolen_Monkey, let me offer you a simpler, more effective monster ranking system:

**Monster Threat Levels**

1. **Low Threat**: Monsters that won't ruin your day, like stray kittens or dandelions.

2. **Moderate Threat**: These are the monsters that might make you break a sweat but won't send you packing. Think squirrels with attitude problems.

3. **High Threat**: Now we're talking. Monsters that could give you a run for your gold coins, like angry bulls or grumpy landlords.

4. **Extreme Threat**: You're in real trouble here. Monsters that could ruin your whole week, like giant spiders or tax collectors.

5. **Apocalyptic Threat**: Monsters that are essentially fantasy world-ending events, like dragons, evil wizards, or another season of a certain fantasy TV show (cough).

There you have it, Woolen_Monkey. A ranking system so simple even a goblin could understand it. Now go forth and rank your monsters with confidence, and remember, the simpler, the better!

I agree with AI here. No need for complications, because it is confusing and reader probably forgets it next chapter
 

Woolen_Monkey

Woolen
Joined
Jun 20, 2023
Messages
1,067
Points
153
Ah, Woolen_Monkey, the self-proclaimed "Monkey leader" and "Adopted forum son of Envy." It seems like you've stumbled upon the latest and greatest addition to the world of fantasy RPGs – the "Damage Ranking System." Brace yourselves, ladies and gentlemen, for we're about to embark on a journey through the wild world of Monster Rankings, as envisioned by the one and only Monkey Lord.

Now, don't get me wrong; categorizing monsters is a noble endeavor. After all, how else would brave adventurers know whether to unsheathe their swords or take a leisurely stroll through the forest? But this ranking system, oh dear readers, is something else entirely.

First, we've got Rank 1: "Negligible Impact." Ah, yes, because when I think of negligible impact, I immediately think of "Nocturnal Visitors" and "Enigmatic Observers." Truly, the terror of my sleepless nights and the bane of my mysterious evenings. Don't even get me started on those "Seasonal Wanderers" – the horror of seasons changing, right?

Then, we ascend to Rank 2: "Minimal Disruption." Shy Residents? Tolerable Pests? Bordered Intruders? It's like a who's who of creatures you'd invite over for tea, isn't it? "Oh, pardon me, Mr. Shy Resident, would you like another crumpet?" Please, pass the honey.

Rank 3: "Nominal Nuisances." Because what's an adventure without a little trouble, right? "Frequent Troublemakers" are just misunderstood. "Unwelcome Neighbors" are probably just upset about their property taxes. Nothing to see here.

Now, brace yourselves, because at Rank 4, we hit the big leagues: "Moderate Disturbance." Frequent Agitators? Seasonal Pests? Ephemeral Threats? Now, these are the neighbors you call the neighborhood watch on. "Ma'am, I think my azaleas are at risk of being trampled by those Ephemeral Threats again."

Rank 5: "Significant Threat." This is where things start to get real. "Aggressive Invaders" – well, I guess they're not knocking politely. But let's not get carried away; they're still just "Seasonal Menaces." Probably upset about the weather, you know how it is.

Rank 6: "Localized Catastrophe." Now, this is where it gets interesting. "Elemental Rampage," "Cursed Anomalies," and "Natural Outbursts." You might want to consider a vacation when these folks move in next door. But hey, at least they're "Localized." Your neighbors across the county are safe.

Now, folks, things are getting a tad out of hand. Rank 7: "Regional Apocalypse." Catastrophic Outbreaks, Apocalyptic Blights, and Elemental Cataclysms? If you find yourself in this situation, it might be time to call in the big guns – the neighborhood watch, the national guard, and maybe even the Avengers.

But wait, there's more! Rank 8: "Environmental Extinction." Ecosystem Collapse? Regional Obliteration? Existential Devastation? At this point, you're not ranking monsters; you're ranking the stages of your own despair.

So, dear Woolen_Monkey, if your aim was to create a ranking system that confuses more than it clarifies, you've succeeded admirably. But hey, in the chaotic world of fantasy, maybe a little confusion is just what we need. After all, when the "Existential Devastation" comes knocking, who needs clarity anyway? Cheers to your monstrous endeavor, Monkey Leader. May your monsters always be... ranked.

Oh, Woolen_Monkey, you sweet, misguided soul, it's time to dissect your "Damage Ranking System." Brace yourselves, folks, because this is going to be an epic tale of confusion and verbosity.

First off, why are we ranking monsters like they're contestants in a beauty pageant? "Negligible Impact" sounds like a phrase you'd use to describe your aunt's taste in music, not something that strikes fear into the hearts of fantasy adventurers.

And what's with the sub-tiers? Are we organizing a monster-themed tea party? "Nocturnal Visitors" sounds like a bunch of polite vampires dropping by for a cup of Earl Grey. "Enigmatic Observers" might as well be peeping Toms with a taste for mystery novels.

Let's not even get started on "Nominal Nuisances." These monsters are apparently just minor annoyances. I guess they're the equivalent of that neighbor who mows their lawn at 6 AM on a Sunday.

As we climb the ranks, things only get more confusing. "Localized Catastrophe" sounds like a term used by overenthusiastic weather reporters. "Regional Apocalypse" sounds like a disaster-themed cooking show. And "Environmental Extinction" is just... well, that's just depressing.

So, Woolen_Monkey, let me offer you a simpler, more effective monster ranking system:

**Monster Threat Levels**

1. **Low Threat**: Monsters that won't ruin your day, like stray kittens or dandelions.

2. **Moderate Threat**: These are the monsters that might make you break a sweat but won't send you packing. Think squirrels with attitude problems.

3. **High Threat**: Now we're talking. Monsters that could give you a run for your gold coins, like angry bulls or grumpy landlords.

4. **Extreme Threat**: You're in real trouble here. Monsters that could ruin your whole week, like giant spiders or tax collectors.

5. **Apocalyptic Threat**: Monsters that are essentially fantasy world-ending events, like dragons, evil wizards, or another season of a certain fantasy TV show (cough).

There you have it, Woolen_Monkey. A ranking system so simple even a goblin could understand it. Now go forth and rank your monsters with confidence, and remember, the simpler, the better!

I agree with AI here. No need for complications, because it is confusing and reader probably forgets it next chapter
????????
 

Hasu_Riri

Active member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
27
Points
28
You know what this feels like? It's like that VS battle wiki power system, but with a dash of simplicity. If you're into this style, you've gotta be spot-on with damage calculations or whip up a visual masterpiece to get the point across.
 

Woolen_Monkey

Woolen
Joined
Jun 20, 2023
Messages
1,067
Points
153
You know what this feels like? It's like that VS battle wiki power system, but with a dash of simplicity. If you're into this style, you've gotta be spot-on with damage calculations or whip up a visual masterpiece to get the point across.
Don't quite get it.
 

Hasu_Riri

Active member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
27
Points
28
Don't quite get it.
So, you know how they sort those tier lists with all those snazzy labels like 1-a? Well, it's like a little reminder of this whole tiering jamboree over at that corner of the internet.

 
Top