This is entirely incorrect about Royal Road. You do not pay anything to post on Royal Road, Royal Road does not do any publishing, it has nothing in common with any sort of vanity press.
Royal Road and ScribbleHub are virtually identical except for the amount of traffic, the visual design, and the fact that RR has harsher rules against smut stories.
But that's not true from what I know... Please allow me to speak, In the acting business,
there are three things that a promotion needs to survive. Content, distribution, and finance. Content and finance are analogous to the webnovel writer and patreon. This is easy to understand. The way that webnovels are 'distributed', or reach the attention of their potential readers are through websites that allow for fair and equal 'distribution'.
These sorts of websites cannot be 'publishers', because there is little to no favoritism in who gets 'distributed', or has more eyeballs on a story.
The moment that you step into the realm of putting up ads, and really bad ones to boot,
you will have to favor one side or a type of story to gain what limited attention there is on a distribution pipeline. Attention is a limited resource. Otherwise, there would be no meaning to a 'distribution'' pipeline, and everyone would be magickally directed to the webnovels we like. But we don't live in that sort of world.
Therefore, a distributor who actively takes a hand in favoring, promoting, and doing 'unequal distribution' is indeed a 'publisher', because the business model of the distributor has a monetary (conflict of interest) gain in promoting those who hand it money (through ads) over other readers.
While I understand there may be many variations of bad publishing practices, and perhaps that is where the confusion lies,
but a vanity press is a distributor that does not have the best interests of its client at heart. You might be confused because you think of a singular type of scam where the vanity press asks for money upfront, and I completely understand, but
I contend that a distributor that asks for money to do its job of distributing through paying for advertisements on the distribution website is a kind of vanity press. The logical end of such a system is that it has now gone into the business for itself, and its business is the promotion of 'established' authors who pay into the system.
Therefore, the closest analogy would be a pay-to-win gacha game, which is run on the same model.
Just because there are many free users doesn't mean it is not a pay-to-win. Or in the more crass sense from my world, there is a world of difference between actors who have worked the stage, and actors who have worked the casting couch.
I refuse to elaborate. (chadgrin.jpeg)
Therefore, since one site is in the business of 'unequal distribution', and one site is not, would you not say that there is a fundamental difference in design philosophy and that your view might be incorrect?
Dou, this level of understanding is possible for Fxxxxx Exxxx. What do you think, everyone?