All of this is irrelevant. I was referring to you spouting your personal shit to a random person on the internet and how you should keep it to yourself.
Especially when it is entirely unprompted, unprovoked, and 5 fucking paragraphs long. That is what I really have an issue with, the random fucking rant that had nothing to do with anything said.
*Sigh* Fine, I still have enough energy to find one more reply fun.
I apologise that you seem to misunderstand my intentions, but first, welcome. You see, by joining this thing called a 'forum', you have inevitably joined into what is called a community.
This word community is generally used in terms of cooperation, helpfulness and many other miscellaneous positive labels. Overall, however, this sets the tone for the specific platform.
When a person encounters problems posting what was intended to be a small helper to someone they believe to be English second language, they give a generally vague, yet reasonable short description of a problem they encountered before they posted the message.
Then later when challenged on 'not being perfect' in a bit of text that was designed to help coach someone newer to English, mentions the issue again, attempting to form a regular friendly connection; for someone who might have missed a basic social cue when trying to criticise someone over grammar, when they physically might not be in a location or state to be completely 'up to par' with however you managed to decide that first post was full of:
Grammatical errors that year 5 students should know not to do.
My earlier prose is what we would call in English 'speaking in a completely normal, factual manner'. You might believe that the context breaks Grice's rule of Relation, but it would be closer to relevance repair. The idea that you can provide a reason for any potential lack of precision or delay is a key component in communication. This makes the 'useless' information contextually relevant. The disclaimer also falls into the concept of Facework, which involves lowering social friction as part of being polite, something I've been doing until now, regardless of your demeanour.
Regardless, I would recommend taking a deep breath or two; you didn't need to devolve into swearing at people over the fact that you tried to 'take a stance' as it might be referred to within the English language, you so vehemently wish to grammar correct me over. We are all a friendly community here, although I suppose now the position seems tentative with new attendance.
Either way, I must apologise again for having studied the English language. It must be quite difficult for you after that grandstanding attempt. I can only imagine all the negative feelings you might have after being shown up in such a manner by someone you failed to actually criticise.
If you feel strongly about this, please do take it up with an admin. I’d hate for my ignore button to keep me from receiving such vital correspondence.
Oh and I'd love to know; since you were so terse the first time, if you could 'r8 mi grama' it would be much appreciated.
