AI can only imitate what human creativity has.
Years ago several decades ago, something similar to this question came up with comparing schools in Asia with schools in the US. They wondered why it is that grades and skill would be higher in schools in Asia by far, but yet the inventions and big new ideas would consistently come out of The US. (This was before the US schools were corrupted by the Swamp and the bad. Now our schools are ..'too rotten'. But at 1 point they were producing very creative people. Creative is good.)
The answer to this came from partly the idea that, people who have spare time and aren't always fighting or trying to endure or work to death have a better outlook on life. They tend to emphasis creativity and aspects of creation. They build and create new ideas when part of their education process allows them to feel and do and see, without too much competition.
And similarly too much competition and just raw fighting just create enmity and captivity with people being too much against the wall to be able to create very much.
This is part of why the education process needs to focus on allowing creativity and individuality but still be reasonable and logical. And its also very similar to the questions brought about in 'MAN VERSUS AI' scenarios.
The idea is... a healthy society builds and creates. An unhealthy society resorts to predatorism and captivity systems. What will happen with AI will partly be determined by if its influenced by builders and creators, or people that are predators.
Also, when you look at countries with 'very little freedoms', they don't actually build and create. Instead they take ideas from others, and then rewrite their history to say they came up with it instead. This is very consistent in history.
AI can be influenced by creative influences and positivity...
But there are drawbacks and dangers. For example, when you research 'Industrial Revolutions' You find that every time there's big technology coming out, its usually used by elitists as a tool to captivate and take away (eat the middle class) instead of making them more prosperous and free. This is what will happen with AI. They are even calling it the 4th Industrial Revolution. And by referring to it this way, you can then look up how people were captured MORE in previous industrial revolutions. And how the standard of living... it looks like they'll say and give you the illusion that with new technology your standard of living will go up. But in actuality it will go down once you look past the illusions. (Basically we already know AI will be used to captivate by predators and to rob wealth like they are already doing.)
This is what will happen.
Now I'm guess you would rather me relate this to writing and stories.
I think real thinking writers and real people will have better stories and more creativity and THEREFORE better stories in the long run. Because AI basically uses adaptive copying and then tuning it enough to not look like copying. Although in theory someone could teach an AI at some point to ... build a story based on 'the best old masters of our time period' in a story. But it would take a human to consistently review and tell the AI, hey keep trying this one has a few issues. And then do that over and over until they get it right. In the end, AI needs a people to tell it where to find the parts to fix. (An example of this is if you ask AI to draw people they will sometimes have 3 arms, or faces like cracked mirrors.)
The two great commandments remain the same.
Love God.
Love others as yourself.
Our meaning and purpose remains unchanged.
Wonderful comment! Awesome~!
