ThisAdamGuy
Proud inventor of the chocolate onion
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2024
- Messages
- 1,005
- Points
- 128
I've never believed in reading books you don't enjoy, and it always bugs me when people say things like "Just push through to book X, that's when it starts getting good!" Am I crazy in saying that a book should be good from the very start? Yeah, I get that it can take a little while for the plot to hit its stride, and a new series will inevitably have to go through its "teething stage" before it reaches its full potential, but those are different from a book just straight up not being good.
Take The Wandering Inn for example. Next to Dungeon Crawler Carl, it's easily the most popular litrpg of all time (maybe even more popular than DCC) but when you ask people about it, they almost always say the same thing: "it doesn't get good until book 4."
The first three books put together are 146 hours long on Audible. That's nearly 4000 pages.
Seriously, am I the crazy one for saying I'm absolutely not going to read 4000 pages of something I'm not enjoying based on the vague promise that it'll start getting good after that?
Take The Wandering Inn for example. Next to Dungeon Crawler Carl, it's easily the most popular litrpg of all time (maybe even more popular than DCC) but when you ask people about it, they almost always say the same thing: "it doesn't get good until book 4."
The first three books put together are 146 hours long on Audible. That's nearly 4000 pages.
Seriously, am I the crazy one for saying I'm absolutely not going to read 4000 pages of something I'm not enjoying based on the vague promise that it'll start getting good after that?
Last edited: