WHEN do you mean.
Historically, I used to write a first chapter thoroughly representative of the other chapters in the book.
Nowadays though, I honestly think of the "first chapter" (in my head) as chapter 0.
by that I mean...
its done after the story is completed, and its contrived.
polling advice seems to say...
1. short.
2. punchy. (I *hate* this over used term. I prefer "hard hitting".)
3. doesn't give much away.
4. differs in style/narration to set it apart.
5. contains some type of immediate action or peril or big concern.
6. Doesn't lead
@Eldoria "the Oracle" to club me down with a thick "advanced calculus narrative" textbook. (she does that)
PS -
@Eldoria:
(jumps up and down)
I did it! I did it!
I used the word "narration" in context, and it seemed natural !
(I probably used the word wrong, and now I'm in for another lecture)
as an example?
A typical story for me, might be first person all through.
say, 5k chapters all over the place though some less.
my chapter 0 (first chapter) though, 1k or 1.5k would be what I'd use.
will be something, anything, exciting or unsettling.
third person without going into too much detail, just showing you a scene for impact.
best example I can give?
watch any James Bond film. Opening is always the same.
Bond is in the middle of some big huge mission.
heavy drama, followed by explosive action and high stakes.
It goes into no details who people are or why, its just... ACTION.
then the opening credits can start.
some naked chick can parade around with a cartoon over her naked bod,
while some popular band does their special song they wrote for the film.
then? the story settles down.
they can do the slow build up to the conflict and premise now.
I tend to do a slow build up to things,
so the opening chapter lets you know things won't stay slow.
there will be sex or violence coming, but your patience will be rewarded.