KiraMinoru
Untitled Generic Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2020
- Messages
- 473
- Points
- 133
I didn’t say target the smaller companies, I said target the smaller in number platforms. There is a difference there. It means people vs systems. Naturally you take out the biggest fish in those systems, not the small ones that can actually help mitigate cancer.So...taking out on smaller companies when the bigger ones hold a lot of those problems themselves? XD
Yes, yes they do. When anything becomes too big the small amounts of cancer that used to be alone and segregated begin to find each other and clump together to become more concentrated. The growth of cancer is an exponential function. Cancer breeds more cancer. When it’s small and separated it’s easier to manage, but when it becomes concentrated, it’s too late to stop. The perfect example is Twitter. What was once intended as a good thing, something for scientists to spread their discoveries in an easy manner turned into the cult it is today.Platforms don't become cancer bc they're too big, but when they let dumb and insensitive content be rampant on their site.
If they shutdown, so be it. Something else will pop up and take their place. That is the process of evolution. A pressure is applied and the subject of that pressure adapts. As for censorship, lol. Don’t make me laugh. You think that isn’t already being done? Right now social media platforms have free reign because they have no such pressure applied to them to make them give a shit about anything because of section 230. I certainly wouldn’t absolve section 230, but I would change it so large platforms in particular would need to give a shit.And Death Note...didn't they overdo the killing? Eventually this can and will potentially leads to censoring and shutdown of things. And it'll get to a point where they they go too far...
Last edited: