Wow... You're just so amazing. Bragging about how open and intellectual you are, editing your old comments to make yourself look better, replying 'no u' as seriously as possible, and all the while trying to be as insulting as you can with text. Truly, a miracle of human kind. In fact, why do I need a fictional example of humans being special when you're right here?
Well, sorry if you were just quick on the response. I stopped editing as soon as you responded, BTW. This forum places time-stamps on edits, so people can check me on that one. My last edit is a minute before your reply every time there. It's not like I edited after your response, which I specifically held back on for propriety reasons.
It's more a matter of my mind providing better ways to phrase things only after I had posted the comment. Great that you used the reply function, so that does show people what you were actually responding to. They can now compare it and make their own judgements. I didn't really change up the argument itself, only cleaned it up to be better phrased. I did not change the meaning or intent of a single point though.
If you'd like to avoid the situation in the future, simply wait 15 minutes before responding if you are going to reply to something I just posted. I admit though that this is not a reasonable thing to ask of someone and the fault for this is mostly on me. I really should do better here and spend more time on proof-reading before I post a comment.
It seems obvious you only want to find faults in me at every turn though, so I see no point in continuing this. And, yes, I will readily admit my faults at every turn. I have nothing to hide, and nothing to cover up with bluster and accusations. You were the one who went on the attack first here, and I will be the one to end it now as it's clear you want to do nothing but drag this into the mud.
EDIT: Also, I really don't see how a "You pulled the 'no you' card" accusation is any kind of argument. If someone makes a comment that is categorically wrong and is clearly nothing but projection, how else is one supposed to respond to it? There's a name for what you just did there. It's called a Kafka trap, and it's a known logic fallacy of the most depraved variety. Only someone who has no intention to argue in good faith would do what you just did.
EDIT 2: Oh, yes. For the sake of completely airing all of my faults in this past exchange here and making good on my previous statement, I will fully admit to speaking with quite a bit of acid after I saw you taking an attitude. I am the kind of person who frequently responds in kind, so perhaps it was inevitable that this would devolve as it did. That said, I will point out that I did give you a very simple out. All you actually had to do was respond reasonably, and you could have even benefited by coming out making me look like an ass-hole if you just provided actual evidence from the beginning without attaching a nasty follow-up afterward.
Something to consider for next time perhaps. And I gurantee there will be a next time. The reason for this is because I'm going to forget your name, and the next time you make a fact-based comment that I don't think looks quite right I AM going to respond. And, if your behavior pattern continues to hold true, then we are going to devolve into this mess again. That's exactly what's going to happen. I'm just laying it all out now. You can avoid it by simply not getting all haughty and just debating like a civil person, but it doesn't seem as though you have that in you.
