Anon2023 case

Is Anon2023 guilty under Section666 for a possible link to disappearance of a deleted member 113259?


  • Total voters
    27

Woolen_Monkey

Woolen
Joined
Jun 20, 2023
Messages
1,066
Points
153
Anon2023- I had nothing to do with it.
I don't hate the guy, but he rubbed a lot of people the wrong way because he couldn't let go of being contradictory all the time. There was a line between being contradictory for fun, and being contradictory to compulsion and even if he was legitimately doing it for fun he couldn't tell where that line was.
Not a bad guy overall though, just had trouble reading others on the forum.
 

Raymann

Da_Villainess™ (¬‿¬)ψ
Joined
Sep 6, 2022
Messages
233
Points
133
Details
Section 666:: also known as criminal justice' devil's advocate section.
It can be applied to anyone for giggles and memes. If there are slightest of vague evidence.

If proven guilty in the 'court of giggles' the accused will be given a random title by the judge that he/she/it legally has to add(adjust with +) under his/her/its name.
 
Last edited:

AnonUnlimited

????????? (???/???)
Joined
Apr 18, 2022
Messages
4,569
Points
183
Details
Section 666 :: also known as criminal justice devil's advocate section.
It can be applied to anyone for propose of giggles and memes. If there are slightest of vague evidence.
*Purpose

Also, I am not guilty. It's actually Aaqil who did it.
 
Top