D
Deleted member 1244
Guest
Disclaimer: Try not to get this shut down by being too spicy... by going off track.
Ok... here is the deal... I am a bit stuck on the ending... of bk 1. Or more like... worried about it.
So the lore of the story goes like this
Pre story:
The world was full of magic at one point, people can all use small magics like making sparks, making their body slightly stronger, heal faster; but big magics like fireballs, and healing wounds you need to study at schools and stuff.
Over time, through social and economic means access to magic becomes segregated and commercialized. Eventually, a class of mages is established and non-mages are oppressed and marginalised. Access to learning the powerful magics became more reserved to the upper class... and some of the greedy ones in the upper class conspired to ensure the access is limited to others and even started to find ways to foster or created the illusion of non-magical people existing and also dehumanise the non-magical or the less magical (that don't really exist).
An idealist/extremist of the upper class saw it as a broken system, secretly started their own conspiracy to burn it all down, and found a way to "shut off the tap" of magic so no one gets ANY magic.
And this person succeeded and Mana in the world started to deplete rapidly.
The world moved to a post-apocalyptic world where society has collapsed and is reorganizing itself.
The story is set here:
The MC is part of a group that hunts and erases from the world the remanent of magical stuff and mages (who have magic batteries stored and are often evil)
The story eventually reaches a point where MC discovers scholars that want to bring magic back and the original idealist trying to shut that shit down.
I have not decided if the MC should let/help magic come back to the world, or not.
---
The implication is this, magic could be seen as a metaphor for real-life issues (political). And I have not really decided what I am trying to say about those issues...
Should I just flip a coin?
Should I worry about what readers see the "magic" as an allegory of?
or should I take the reins and make sure it's clear what magic is a metaphor for and actually suggest something like... I don't know, "Blah Blah Blah is bad"
Ok... here is the deal... I am a bit stuck on the ending... of bk 1. Or more like... worried about it.
So the lore of the story goes like this
Pre story:
The world was full of magic at one point, people can all use small magics like making sparks, making their body slightly stronger, heal faster; but big magics like fireballs, and healing wounds you need to study at schools and stuff.
Over time, through social and economic means access to magic becomes segregated and commercialized. Eventually, a class of mages is established and non-mages are oppressed and marginalised. Access to learning the powerful magics became more reserved to the upper class... and some of the greedy ones in the upper class conspired to ensure the access is limited to others and even started to find ways to foster or created the illusion of non-magical people existing and also dehumanise the non-magical or the less magical (that don't really exist).
An idealist/extremist of the upper class saw it as a broken system, secretly started their own conspiracy to burn it all down, and found a way to "shut off the tap" of magic so no one gets ANY magic.
And this person succeeded and Mana in the world started to deplete rapidly.
The world moved to a post-apocalyptic world where society has collapsed and is reorganizing itself.
The story is set here:
The MC is part of a group that hunts and erases from the world the remanent of magical stuff and mages (who have magic batteries stored and are often evil)
The story eventually reaches a point where MC discovers scholars that want to bring magic back and the original idealist trying to shut that shit down.
I have not decided if the MC should let/help magic come back to the world, or not.
---
The implication is this, magic could be seen as a metaphor for real-life issues (political). And I have not really decided what I am trying to say about those issues...
Should I just flip a coin?
Should I worry about what readers see the "magic" as an allegory of?
or should I take the reins and make sure it's clear what magic is a metaphor for and actually suggest something like... I don't know, "Blah Blah Blah is bad"