:meowsip: Which you do. You make general conclusions, which is the moment you leave the subjective perceive sphere and extend them to a broader picture. That is the moment your conclusions become objective.
The only way for "negative" feedback to be negative, but still having positive effect is from an external point of view, from an objective point of view.
But if you didn't receive the criticism it badly, then it wouldn't be, from a subjective point of view, negative, to begin with. As the criticism would be not negative for them, but in fact positive, then in the true sense of the word.
:meowsip: You assign a different quality to the same object. That is an objective difference. In fact, you reverse their effect.
The same way, a medicine has different effect depending on the test subject. That is an objective difference born from their depositions. In this case, psychological...
:meowsip: The reason we focus on negative feedback rather positive is that positive confirms, meanwhile negative counters our position. As such, positive requires no reaction, whereas negative one does.
And even if, then what? Don't you think they will be suspicious when she shows up without their buddy? You think they won't kill her mother then instantly out the goodness of what, their heart? Surely not.
Outcome. Mother died. Mission failed.
First you complain about them being weak, now you suddenly want her to knock them out without killing them. Mind you, some of the most difficult stuff imaginable. Don't you see the problem?
Two seconds later, you say meanwhile, "Instant kill" is a term meaning defeating enemy in one attack. I did not say she should murder them. She could have knocked them out or incapacitated them. Even if that would be harder and more dangerous."
Response:
First you say, I quote verbatim, "Also, are those guys genins? Otherwise, how could they be so weak? We know that single chunin can make her bite dust despite surpassing the kids of same age."
Reader: "Instant kill" is a term meaning defeating enemy in one attack. I did not say she should murder them. She could have knocked them out or incapacitated them. Even if that would be harder and more dangerous.