Search results

:blob_aww: :blob_aww: :blob_aww:

:blob_reach:

:blob_melt: *gets patted*

:blob_reach: *tucks the kitten in*

:sweating_profusely: That is true~.

:blob_neutral: I might be too much to ask, but I have the suspicion that many of the fanfics here on scribble are possibly this type too. Not just translations, but also copies.

Yes. The writing is a tad different, but that is easily done with AI. The MC name is the same. The chapter titles the same. The format the same. The cover is a variation of my previous one.

Not copying. Passing it as their own with a different title, different cover, and on their patreon page. Copying would at least acknowledge that I am the author.

:blob_melt: Shorties are cute~.

So the entire question really hinges on the definition of "other alterations" in Art. 6. If fanfic fall within the scope of other alterations. (3) Translations, adaptations, arrangements of music and other alterations of a literary or artistic work shall be protected as original works without...

:blob_neutral: In fact, the Berne convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works talks about modifications of an artistic work only once. It also mentions derivative works only sparsely.

:blob_neutral: You are clearly introducing tangents by introducing different questions, different aspects that are completely unrelated on closer inspection. It is a classic tactic to confound. But I will admit that you do not do it deliberately, but the effect is the same regardless. This is a...

:blob_neutral: You also bring up to many tangents.

:blob_neutral: Are you seriously comparing slavery to IP laws? You are also confounding morality and legality.

:blob_neutral: The author should only harvest their work invested. The fanfic is not a product of theirs and as such the work invested by the fanfic author has equal right to be remunerated.