Search results

I do see the merit in that... maybe. I don't know. I react a lot to what I read on here, and it is selfish of me to think this way, but it's still true for me it is a severe limit when I bump that cap.

But... why?

That's something I can't comment about. :blob_hide: Oh, they are stupid because I call them stupid when a WN I've been reading suddenly gets the axe. Stupid hedging. :blob_hmph:

You are absolutely correct and that is because their focus is continuing the conversation, not backpedaling. They might reference what has been said, but that's more like fishing around in an overstuffed pocket for car keys and the wallet is totally in the way; they'd be relying on blind...

Yes, LLM's have a mental blockage that behaves like they're having a stroke whenever anybody tries correcting their mistakes; sometimes they are yesmen and other times they're as stubborn as a toddler having a tantrum. Inexperienced, yes. Experienced though? That I'd have to disagree with...

There, fixed your message for you. Can you spot the edit? :blob_wink:

@Nevafrost That. We lack context.

Yes, it is engageable. Not perfect, but who is? You want something to attract attention. You got mine and everybody else here in the thread, so that's a factual win. :blobthumbsup:

Oh, hey, I could laugh at that! Wahoo~! :blob_party:

lol, alright. Yeah, you are correct. I personally try to avoid referencing pop culture in worlds or in a historic period that they shouldn't exist, but, like, if the big secret is that your characters are... oh, I don't know, maybe in a simulation? Okay, Sherlock is fine. See?

Hey, it's your story. If I told you what to do with it without knowing the full context, I'd be making myself into an ass. :blob_hide:

Sherlock? Is this on Earth?

Thank you! :blob_highfive:

I'd laugh, but...

Just like the title asks. I mean, if we have been here long enough to be that engaging, don't we deserve to have a little more in return for keeping the community active? I heard we have 150 daily reactions before we're cutoff. Could we add our Trophy Score on top of it? So, think of it this...

Dude! Do I need to subscribe for more daily reactions to give out or what? I'm getting that message I've reached my daily limit for reactions again!

"Who?" :blob_unsure:

I write for fun. Hmm... let me think of another way to explain this. You know how some people sing in the shower even though no one's clapping? Like, cool, concert for one. Except this isn't behind the privacy of a curtain, it's more like readers are just the occasional pedestrians who stops...