Search results

@MatchaChocolate69 Mexican, yes

I feel like I sinned just looking at that thing

What the hell is an Aquila lol? Let’s do cynda

I won’t report you if you spam Aaqil with the best Psyduck fusions every day

Get banned, loser :blob_evil:

*Clicks report.*

I am keeping your hand.

:blob_catflip: :blob_catflip: :blob_catflip:

This is arguing about a lot of specifics, though (I am talking from a very pure combat perspective and you are not). I think it is kinda a moot point. On paper: Fast paced combat in huge battles is hard, but individually? Not so much, can go either way. It still won’t last too long serve for...

Realistically, it could. But if they aren’t grumbling at each other and circling around like cock fighters, it is going to reach a very quick conclusion, with or without protection.

Sorry, irony doesn’t compute for me when speaking with people who don't speak English as their main language :blob_pat_sad:. I consider their words more directly since it isn’t mine either. I do not see why quick paced battle is nonsense between people that want to genuinely kill or disable each...

Armored battles or special duels, maybe. Besides, we are talking about individual sword fights, one on one, maybe two on two, right? Could you give me examples of the battles you are referring to?

It is mostly BS if the people are armored. Is that what you meant?

Well, taking your first post at face value, if EVERY sword fight ended in 20 seconds, there would still have been sword fighters aplenty. The poster of the thread you saw was obviously exaggerating and generalizing. 20 seconds is still a pretty good estimate for unarmored combat between two...

@Assurbanipal_II I did. Logic doesn’t really apply, but I didn’t feel like interacting with anyone a bit after I posted it

@Voidiris Bernkastel