Search results

Intelligence is what you want it to be, even more so in fiction. The line between genius and bs the author makes work isn't just thin but highly subjective. A well structured thought process makes the result an "obvious conclusion" if you want to doubt.

You referenced things you read to illustrate your point, that's what I'm referring to. This isn't smut specific but I've noticed that I liked works better that exceeded lower expectations than those that met average ones. Might sound obvious, but this held even when the actual quality (as...

What you expect going in influences how you evaluate what you actually get. And I'd say smut doesn't evoke particularly high estimates about character depth in most.

That is what they mean by file corruption. Whatever you're using to view/edit the image uses a format incompatible with what other programs expect from what it is declared as. Where do you have it from and what did you do with it yourself? Can you open it in an image editing program and copy a...

What would you want to share about it that does not relate to your faith in the first place? An anthology review?

What client do you use? Did you also experience the bug on other devices/browsers?

You posed no lower limit, so you're looking at them.

That only helps against the poison, and leads back to my first point. This is going to be pointless unless there are clear rules to work with.

Each would depend on limitations, plus most are very vague in what they even do. Poison or the Kars treatment for the first.

Drinking and chatting about what everyone has been up to is how those things usually go, and I don't see much of a reason that one would be inevitable, especially after such a short while. So the central question is what makes you want to write a reunion in the first place. Whatever should...

Probably, but I don't decide that, nor is it likely to be spotted here by @Tony. I only use gdocs, so I can't recommend good alternatives, but there are some as far as I know, like ClickUp.

Vague as can be, but the rule exists. Use GDocs. It already has all those features that would have to be build from ground up for SH, private sharing and live collaboration. What you put as Co-Author sounds easy enough to include as convenience, but if there's one main author the story belongs...

Fair, though I was mostly referring to the seeming incomprehensibility absence of it seems to have for some.