Search results

Dunno whether you just misclicked or something glitched out, but this seems like a matter of [remove formatting].

Strong no (4): 582 words total, 145.5 avg Strong yes (4): 93 words total, 23.25 avg :blob_hmm_two:

There's an easy way to preempt any threat to your safety and aspirations. Make your existence something you don't mind losing, or better yet end things yourself. "100% control" over your life. Or maybe take a look at the others' approaches, if for whatever reason this entirely logical...

Imo it's a lot easier to do a start that sounds good by itself than one that can support an equally entertaining story. As long as it's unwritten the story is your expectation of it, while a mediocre or bad execution usually overshadows first impressions.

The very same archetype exists in hetero romances, the sole difference being that you have a counterexample with positive sentiment of the same gender by design of the narrative. I've also come across some where one of the love interests is in a relationship with someone of their own gender...

And what has taken its place is self gratification projected onto other species or "uhg, humanity (not me tho ofc)". Human supremacy isn't gone of course, and whether you think of personal superiority fantasies and critical takes towards your own to be as bad as the other way is probably up for...

Just about any story featuring goblins from a human perspective?

Nefar Oct: Can I not write smut? No? Sad... Nefar Dec: LET ME WRITE SEEEEEEGS!!!!

Account > Release Filtering?

Doing so puts focus on the character, so if it's supposed to be indefinitely I'd say it's pointless to do so. And for anything else the "successfully" part is questionable, unless "until they change their mind on their own" counts as successful to you.

2nd person conditional future that starts with "If you got rid of that ye ye ass haircut"

"The average" might have vastly different goals approaching a field though, making the comparison based on interpretation of the evaluator. The wriggle room remains, the way I see it. The remark directly above it in conjunction with the main topic: Humility of the intelligent

"People" are still as susceptible to emotional convenience though. Which leads me to this. The video exclusively talks in third person. It's neither by people who define themselves as such, nor addressing them with the intention to help with the challenges it outlines. So it either decided how...

Three things. If this is such an overwhelmingly common trait in intelligent people it makes a character relevantly less realistic, where does all this content on the traits of intelligence come from? The people themselves don't toot their own horn by definition, the others would rather praise...