But.... it did. Because if "something" existed, then "time" could not exist. If "time" existed, then "something" couldn't exist, for it was turned into time. Therefore, it did change.... if we never labled time, then it would still only be "something", as I have said before.
Because it was the unknown "something" there would be no properties to describe it..... which would mean that it was completely changed when we named it.
Let's say I invent a robot that tracks you down, but I haven't named it yet. Three days later, when I name it the Cadmar Tracker 3000, what the robot is hasn't changed
No, but there is "proof" of the robot. Physical evidence. It is made out of "matter" and cannot be changed by "thought". But "time" is made of "thought" and can be altered by "thought".
But "time" is directly related to "numbers". If I change the numbers surrounding time, the perspective in which people view it becomes different, and "sight", or rather "point of view" in this case, is a property....
Time is progress, numbers are merely the thing we chose to view time through, they are not actually connected to time. You could represent time with a constantly extending line drawn on the ground with a stick and we'd still get it. And changing the perspective changes the people not time, time won't change from that.
If I told people that the color red was orange, they wouldn't belive me, for the thought that "orange" was different from "red". However, if I raised a child telling it that "red" was "orange", then it would change. The way the child would describe "red" would change.
However, you would need the entire world to agree to actually change colors, and if you changed the thought of time to something else, then it wouldn't be time anymore, you would need a new name for what is currently called time, because it would still exist.