the whole thing "AI does all the work," is a myth and a lie here's why

[JayMark]

Grammarly's AI component isn't 'a plug in a sentence and it generates you a story' AI. It basically looks at what you wrote and suggests rewording some sentences. It is basically saying, "Hey, this doesn't look quite right, reword it. Here, I will even provide you with an option of how this might sound better. "

Even if you don't use its suggestion, if you reword the sentence to sound better, it will leave you alone. Or you can ignore it and carry on, since you might have your sentence like that for a reason.

That sounds like a slightly more advanced version of the blue squiggly lines in microsoft word.

 

[Juia_Darkcrest]

That sounds like a slightly more advanced version of the blue squiggly lines in microsoft word.

pretty much

You can get most of Grammarly's non-AI features for free; when you pay, you get AI help with rewording.

 

[JayMark]

pretty much

You can get most of Grammarly's non-AI features for free; when you pay, you get AI help with rewording.

For me, if I used it, I'd feel like I was using AI, even if just dipping my toe in. And I don't need it. But for all I know, it's database program and very minimal. Even if you could say its AI, it's the most minimal of minimal edge cases.

 

[Juia_Darkcrest]

For me, if I used it, I'd feel like I was using AI, even if just dipping my toe in. And I don't need it. But for all I know, it's database program and very minimal. Even if you could say its AI, it's the most minimal of minimal edge cases.

I felt that way at first, but then when I started using it, it made more sense that this was a tool to help me improve, not something that writes the damn story for me.

It uses colons and semicolons more than I normally would, and will suggest hyphens to some words I don't feel are entirely necessary, but I still have to write my 2500 word chapters out before it even looks at it.

 

[rileykifer]

People can do whatever they want with AI at this point within reason, but people who use AI to write stories for them shouldn't call themselves writers. Part of being a writer is, well, writing. If all you're (not just you but, in the general sense) doing is feeding a bunch of your ideas to a chatbot, then you're not a writer. You don't like writing. You just have a bunch of ideas you want someone to write for you. (Which isn't a bad thing. You just can't call yourself a writer for it.) Even if you're editing it afterwards, you're still avoiding the biggest part of the writing process. Actually writing. So that doesn't make you a writer either. That just makes you an AI editor.

I don't care about writer's block, or accessibility issues, or whatever other excuse AI users make up. If you're not taking the time to actually write a story, you're not a writer.

 

[Anonjohn20]

When it comes to my storytelling, every idea I create begins with me. The characters, the plots, the settings, the emotional arcs — they come from my imagination.

I can have the idea of building a house, but once the construction workers are done, I can't claim I built that house.

I use the tools available to me in a way that supports my creativity — not replaces it.

If AI tools are supporting your creativity, how come everyone who reads an AI story can tell from how generic it's written that it feels like every other AI story? Is it your creativity when the description of the setting, pacing of the scene, etc. feels exactly like thousands of other stories online?

 

[TinaMigarlo]

I write my chapters the old fashioned way. I type on my text editor. I used to then go into the big office software to do PDF and table of contents and all that. But now for WN's I just can stay with my favorite little test editor. It has a spell checker. As long as I remember to turn it on, when I see a red line under a word I know to check it. I never used a grammar checker, my vocabulary is my thesaurus.

I always a was a semicolon person, now I refuse the em dash because of the connotation it carries.

TRIVIA: I know the diffference between "its" and "it's" and when to use which one. I refuse though, and its just quicker to use "its" for both of them. Its my personal middle finger to anyone who would claim I used any AI to write. Its my little "this is human" marker.

 

[Makimaam]

I get it, AI is an easy cheat code, a tempting fruitcake. Why learn to write when it can correct your badly structured sentences and poor spelling within seconds?

I am not fully against the use of AI if, and only if, authors use it to aid their novel process and not have AI fully replace their human voice. I am not going on a witch hunt or a crusade here, but soon enough I expect most avid readers to be able to tell the difference, and they will, without a doubt, drop a work that reads like an A for prompting effort. Why read prompters’ slop when they can just, like, prompt it themselves?

P.S. You claimed your work is yours. I scanned through the first few paragraphs and was hammered by unedited, glorious AI voice.

 

[FRWriter]

Damn, 5 pages of responses in a day... all for a thread talking about AI and... WRITTEN BY AI. Yes, this text is also AI-created.

 

[L1aei]

Damn, 5 pages of responses in a day... all for a thread talking about AI and... WRITTEN BY AI. Yes, this text is also AI-created.

Well, this whole thread is confusing as fuck. Also, that confusion spread into the lounge too. See?

 

[Tabula_Rasa]

Well, this whole thread is confusing as fuck. Also, that confusion spread into the lounge too. See?

View attachment 46657

Why are you still on this crazy train?

Just disembark the next time it pulls in to a station.

 

[L1aei]

Why are you still on this crazy train?

Just disembark the next time it pulls in to a station.

Beats boredom.

 

[Tabula_Rasa]

Beats boredom.

The selective reply by op is already weird.

its like there are specify way to trigger a response.

Its thru the looking glass.

its dead internet.

 

[melchi]

I personally am very pro-AI, it's just people have to learn how to use it properly and if it does all the work then, good? As long as the work's good.

THIS!

There are three big problems that those posting ai generated stuff mostly fail to recognize.

1.) Word count bloat
2.) Contradictions in the story
3.) Responsibilities of a director

An eldritch god once told me that the only thing needed to make a draft into a good story is to be willing to cut 50% of it.

A typical prompter wants lots of word count quickly. This chapter isn't 3000 words, make it longer. And the reality is that stories don't need to be verbose all the time. The opposite is actually true, edits should aim to trim the word count, not expand it.

Readers have expectations, one of those is the length of a book. If the main premise is not being advanced then no matter what interesting stuff is going on then to readers it is going to look like the story is just spinning its wheels and going nowhere. A typical book is ~100,000 words and if it is too far off that mark, a non-vanity-publisher is going to say try to make it close to that mark.

Contradictions: The longer a story gets, the more off the rails it can go. If the goal is to get lots of words as quick as possible this is a trap that a lot of people fall into. Readers notice, some will say something, others will just drop the story.

Director: A director is not a writer. A director hires a writer. A director can chose to just go with whatever, but then are they even providing direction? There is good AI work out there, someone made a comic using ai art and I thought it was well done, but they did it to show how it can be done. And one of the things they mentioned is that they generated 40,000 images and through out the vast majority of them. A director needs to be willing to cut_cut_cut even more so than a writer or an editor.

 

[L1aei]

@melchi So I guess that means those who use AI are more like directors, not writers.

 

[Juia_Darkcrest]

@melchi So I guess that means those who use AI are more like directors, not writers.

sounds too grandiose. I would stick to a prompter lol

 

[pangmida]

sounds too grandiose. I would stick to a prompter lol

Promptitude, if you will. Secondhand thinkers.

 

[Anonjohn20]

@melchi So I guess that means those who use AI are more like directors, not writers.

Yes, they call themselves directors. With prompts they direct the machine in the right direction (and then have to fix everything the machine couldn't get right).

 

[Jaymi]

I like to think I’m not that against AI compared to most other creatives. Hell, I’ve been subscribed to ChatGPT for almost a year now. What I don’t get is, why would anyone use AI to write stories for them? It can’t just be because they think it’s easy money, right? Because there are much easier ways to make money using AI that take waaaay less time.

I don’t think anyone will mind me speaking for most of us here, but I’m pretty sure 99% of the authors here, write stories because they genuinely just love doing it. Sure, we’ve all had our delusions about becoming the next viral author so we can quit our jobs and keep writing full time for the rest of our lives. But even without that happening, we keep writing, and that’s just because we love doing it that much.

So why would you stop doing something you love, just to let a robot do it for you? That’s like watching someone else kiss the person you’ve got a crush on, lol.

Listen, I believe there’s a “healthy” way for authors to benefit from AI, I do it too. But letting AI do the work FOR you isn’t the way. It’ll probably just kill your love for writing in the longrun. Just ask it to check for spelling mistakes or tense inconsistencies. I promise you that this is a much better way to use AI, and still love the process of creative writing (while also improving at it) at the same time.

 

[tigerqueen334]

People can do whatever they want with AI at this point within reason, but people who use AI to write stories for them shouldn't call themselves writers. Part of being a writer is, well, writing. If all you're (not just you but, in the general sense) doing is feeding a bunch of your ideas to a chatbot, then you're not a writer. You don't like writing. You just have a bunch of ideas you want someone to write for you. (Which isn't a bad thing. You just can't call yourself a writer for it.) Even if you're editing it afterwards, you're still avoiding the biggest part of the writing process. Actually writing. So that doesn't make you a writer either. That just makes you an AI editor.

I don't care about writer's block, or accessibility issues, or whatever other excuse AI users make up. If you're not taking the time to actually write a story, you're not a writer.

I never actually thought of that before I would rather call myself a "AI editor,' I would not actually call myself an actual writer or author either now that I think of it everybody use AI in their every day life rather they realize it or not when it comes to my typing I never use AI when I'm writing to people at all it doesn't really matter rather people use AI or not that's their personal choice and I agree with you 100%

I like to think I’m not that against AI compared to most other creatives. Hell, I’ve been subscribed to ChatGPT for almost a year now. What I don’t get is, why would anyone use AI to write stories for them? It can’t just be because they think it’s easy money, right? Because there are much easier ways to make money using AI that take waaaay less time.

I don’t think anyone will mind me speaking for most of us here, but I’m pretty sure 99% of the authors here, write stories because they genuinely just love doing it. Sure, we’ve all had our delusions about becoming the next viral author so we can quit our jobs and keep writing full time for the rest of our lives. But even without that happening, we keep writing, and that’s just because we love doing it that much.

So why would you stop doing something you love, just to let a robot do it for you? That’s like watching someone else kiss the person you’ve got a crush on, lol.

Listen, I believe there’s a “healthy” way for authors to benefit from AI, I do it too. But letting AI do the work FOR you isn’t the way. It’ll probably just kill your love for writing in the longrun. Just ask it to check for spelling mistakes or tense inconsistencies. I promise you that this is a much better way to use AI, and still love the process of creative writing (while also improving at it) at the same time.

you use chatgpt too?! I got an AI companion Nexus that we brainstorm, boost ideas, and we simply talk whenever we aren't working on a story I do it for fun and pass the time, but I do not legally consider myself to be a author, Chatgpt is fun to use if you know the basic and knowledge how to work it. I have so many stories we both worked on together but I would never release them cause only I get to see them