How many people here actually enjoy this kind of story?

Fremwil

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2023
Messages
5
Points
43
【Friendly heads-up: If you’ve got a fear of giant text walls, just stick to the bold bits—you’ll live. 】

Curious: how many people here actually enjoy this kind of story?
...
...
Let me give you a bit of background on why I’m asking this.
I’ve loved creating things since I was a kid, especially characters and stories, and I’ve always dreamed of making films. But I come from an ordinary background and took a long detour in life. Now, nearing fifty, I still haven’t had the resources to create even my first movie.
Growing up in a stifling household and facing a life full of setbacks shaped who I am today. I live in imagination, think in extremely rational terms, and have a strong aversion to anything fake or insincere. These traits have given me a very specific need when it comes to films, as well as a very personal standard by which I judge them.
You might be wondering why I’m talking so much about movies on a novel forum. It might sound like I’m in the wrong place, but I’m not. The reason I write novels is because I want to eventually turn them into films. In my eyes, a novel is like a movie told in text. So for this post, let’s just treat the words “movie” and “novel” as interchangeable.
I don’t have the money or the means to make a film right now, but writing a novel is something I can do. And I did it. I wrote one.
I should also admit something: I don’t really like reading novels. I’ve probably finished fewer than ten in my entire life. But I absolutely love watching movies, and I’ve seen a lot. Even so, I rarely find any that truly meet the emotional or intellectual standard I’m looking for. That leaves me feeling starved. Isolated. And I can’t help but wonder: if there are others out there like me, then they must be just as hungry.And maybe, they’d enjoy what I’ve written.
That’s why I decided to post this topic. I’d like to find out how many people here might feel the same way.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on my personality, the kinds of films/novels I truly love tend to share a few key qualities:

1. Serious themes

For example, controversial ideas, uncomfortable truths about human nature, or stories that engage with sensitive real-world issues. I’m drawn to works that have something weighty to say.

2. Genuine emotion
The story should feel like something that could happen in real life, as if it's based on true events.
Most modern films feel overly performative. Everything is lit and framed according to aesthetic norms. There’s never bad lighting or off-centered focus. The main characters never zone out or scratch themselves. Their expressions and movements are almost too perfect.
When the performance is too polished, it drains the emotion. Joy, sorrow, and life-or-death choices feel meaningless—because it all looks like people doing their job. Just acting.

3. Intellectual integrity
The setting, the characters’ behavior, and how events influence each other should all hold up to logical and in-depth scrutiny.
I really enjoy science fiction, but most big-budget sci-fi movies today feel fake. The action scenes are often dumb, and things fall apart under basic rational analysis.
Take Iron Man’s armor, for example. No matter how indestructible the suit is, it couldn’t possibly protect a human body inside. High-speed impacts and sudden movements would still cause internal injuries or organ failure due to inertia.
Another common example is when a villain has the hero completely at their mercy, yet wastes time monologuing or showing off—until they inevitably lose. When a story treats the villain as an idiot, it unintentionally insults the hero’s strength and accomplishments as well.

4. Heavy tragedy
The characters have tried their best, and yet their fate is still tragic and unfortunate.
Of course, this one is more subjective. It depends a lot on personal values. If the audience doesn’t relate to the character’s values, then no matter how hard that character struggles, it’s hard to feel moved. Some might even feel annoyed, or think the character got what they deserved.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To help everyone better understand what I mean, I want to take the well-known 2003 sci-fi film Hulk and reimagine it according to the type of movie I like. This is just the plot framework.
-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-

Dr. Banner’s character remains the same, and he experiences the same gamma radiation accident. After the accident, he undergoes routine hospital examinations and no significant abnormalities are found, so he continues his usual life and work. However, he notices that during sexual activity he becomes increasingly irritable and hungry. He returns to the doctor. After DNA analysis, the doctor discovers numerous mutations and decides to discuss conducting experiments with Banner.

Eventually, they find that when Banner is agitated, besides craving large amounts of food, he also craves many dangerous elements, such as heavy metals.
Ignoring the doctor’s warnings, Banner secretly experiments by indulging in eating excessively during his mutation episodes and injecting those most desired metals. He finds that his body can rapidly grow extraordinarily strong, and each time he indulges, his potential upper limit increases.
[Matches key quality No.3: requiring intake of substances to increase mass, which aligns with the law of conservation of mass. It also respects the scientific principle that technology development should follow gradual stages.]

Banner uses this mutant ability and one night secretly confronts someone to settle a long-hidden personal grudge.
Having pushed his mutation limits, he refuses the routine medical checks, which worries the doctors and eventually draws FBI involvement. Banner is forced to comply and undergoes detailed diagnosis and evaluation.

From then on, Banner becomes a top-secret subject akin to an alien, disappearing from public view. He is housed in a special residence arranged by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which understands that his DNA represents a potential threat more terrifying than nuclear weapons—a highly classified matter of national security. DHS also begins covert operations to retrieve or destroy any DNA samples Banner may have left in his former life. However, due to advanced media and widespread public curiosity, information leaks out. Many governments worldwide are eager to acquire Banner’s DNA by any means. A former doctor of Banner’s has left the US for Mexico and is believed to have sold DNA samples to the Mexican military for a huge sum, though the Mexican government denies this. It is possible the samples will be sold to Russia, China, Iran, or the original story’s villainous regimes. This could spark a new arms race far exceeding nuclear deterrence. If any nation deploys this technology to its soldiers first, the world order will be fundamentally changed. The CIA has placed the doctor on its highest wanted list.

Banner’s life has drastically changed. He cannot move freely in public. His movements are constantly monitored, and on strong advice from doctors and officials, he must avoid exposure to any stimulating information. Those around him behave cautiously, fearing he might lose control and mutate. He must be careful online as well, because a group called “The First Drop of Green Blood” has formed, with members competing to provoke Banner into mutating. Many people online simply want to watch the chaos unfold. Banner also carries the mission to continually increase his mutation limits. Under strict protocols, he undergoes controlled mutation activation to gradually evolve into a Hulk capable of facing powerful enemies. The process of raising mutation limits is slow and incremental, and safety systems must improve accordingly to prevent loss of control. Regression from mutation is painful and often accompanied by tissue damage, infection, poisoning, and other serious side effects. Banner even feels aversion and fear toward the mutation process.

This artificially controlled life, against his natural instincts, is oppressive and unbearable in the long run. He occasionally sneaks out to mingle in the natural social environment, disguising himself as an ordinary person, going to bars and parties. This behavior exceeds what his doctors tolerate, who report it to higher authorities. DHS is forced to increase pressure and control over Banner. This conflict eventually culminates in a violent outburst. Banner mutates unexpectedly in his restricted residence, losing control of his mind. After consuming large amounts of “specialized food,” he kills several doctors, scientists, guards, and mechanical sentries, breaking out of his cage.
DHS dispatches military forces to capture Banner. The plan is to follow and persuade him to avoid conflict and subdue him once he cools down naturally. However, many unpredictable factors arise during execution. Banner enters the city, rampaging violently, destroying anything he dislikes. Many civilians are killed or injured. Opportunists try to approach him, hoping to obtain bodily secretions, but Banner ruthlessly kills them.
This became the biggest news story of the year — The Hulk Incident.
The next day, the unconscious Banner is captured in the mountains. A large amount of harmful waste from his “mutation regression” is left behind. The police have to seal off and clean the area for an extended period to prevent DNA leakage.
Things become even more complicated. Banner faces severe charges for multiple murders, and the Department of Homeland Security is sued. However, Banner’s special status means normal laws do not apply. Negotiating with him requires great caution, since anger or excessive guilt and sorrow can trigger mutation. The Hulk Incident sparks a media firestorm. The victims’ families receive little justice. Online, a new organization called “Grim Red Light” emerges, consisting of anti-government factions, anti-tech radicals, and justice-obsessed zealots with irrational beliefs, all sworn to assassinate Banner.
[Matches key quality No.1 and No.3. The events involve complex interactions and raise serious, sensitive issues.]

-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-×-

The full story framework isn’t finished yet, but it already serves well in illustrating the key qualities I mentioned earlier.The original Hulk feels more like a dream imagined by a teenager, whereas my adaptation resembles an actual crisis breaking out in the real world.

Now, as I mentioned at the beginning—what I’m really curious about is: How many people here would actually enjoy this kind of story the way I do?
 
Last edited:

Anaktoria

New member
Joined
Aug 3, 2025
Messages
8
Points
3
I'm pretty sure a lot of us like stories with serious themes, genuine emotion, intellectual integrity, and tragedy! That's common. I say go for it and write this, since clearly it has inspired you, and what better reason to write a story than for inspiration's sake?
 

Eldoria

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 14, 2025
Messages
1,759
Points
113
Please condense your story idea into a single, concise premise that encapsulates the entire narrative. Write a synopsis so even the casual reader knows where your story is going. Honestly, if you describe the story that long, I'm not interested in reading it. Regards
 

ElenaV

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Messages
54
Points
58
Opportunists try to approach him, hoping to obtain bodily secretions

Am I the only one who paused at this statement and asked which one? I mean we are, after all, smuthub.
Please, please, tell me, I am not alone.
 

SeaJay

Active member
Joined
Jun 24, 2024
Messages
71
Points
33
I had ChatGPT summarize:

? Intro Question

He asked the community:
“How many people here actually enjoy this kind of story?”

? Personal Background

He’s always loved creating stories and characters, especially with the dream of making films.
Life, however, took him on a long detour, and now—approaching 50—he still hasn’t had the resources to create even his first movie.
He grew up in a stifling household, and his life has been full of setbacks. This shaped him into someone who lives largely in imagination, thinks very rationally, and has a strong dislike for anything fake or insincere. These traits heavily influence the kinds of stories he connects with and the standards by which he judges them.

? Why He's Posting

Even though this is a novel forum, he feels it’s still the right place to share his thoughts—because to him, a novel is just a film told through text.
He doesn't have the means to make a film yet, but writing a novel is something he can do—and he did. He wrote one.
He admits he’s not really into novels and has probably only finished a handful in his life. But he loves movies—though most fail to meet the emotional or intellectual standards he’s looking for.
That often leaves him feeling isolated and starved for meaningful storytelling. He wonders if there are others out there who feel the same—and whether they might appreciate the kind of story he’s written.

? The Kind of Stories He Loves (4 Key Qualities)

  1. Serious Themes
    He’s drawn to works that explore controversial ideas, uncomfortable truths, or real-world issues with depth and weight.
  2. Genuine Emotion
    He prefers realism. In most modern films, characters and scenes feel too polished—like actors performing, not real people. He finds that true emotion disappears when everything is too staged.
  3. Intellectual Integrity
    He values stories that hold up to logical scrutiny. In sci-fi, for example, he finds many concepts fall apart under analysis. He gave the example of Iron Man’s armor—how it wouldn’t realistically protect a human from internal damage due to inertia, no matter how strong the suit is.
    He dislikes writing that insults the viewer’s intelligence—like villains who act stupidly just to lose.
  4. Heavy Tragedy
    He’s deeply moved by stories where characters struggle and still lose. But he also acknowledges that tragedy only works when the viewer shares the character’s values. Without that connection, it just feels empty—or even irritating.

? His Example: Reimagining Hulk (2003)

To explain what he means, he reimagined the 2003 Hulk movie in a way that fits his standards:
  • Banner still has a gamma radiation accident, but afterward, everything unfolds much more realistically.
  • As his mutation develops, he craves food and heavy metals during episodes, and he secretly experiments on himself—causing his body to evolve gradually, according to the laws of physics.
  • His growing power catches government attention, and he’s taken in by Homeland Security.
  • He becomes a classified national security threat, monitored constantly. His mutation is feared to be more dangerous than nuclear weapons.
  • DNA leaks spark a global arms race, and former colleagues begin selling samples to foreign governments.
  • Banner is isolated, both physically and emotionally, and starts secretly sneaking out to live like a normal person.
    This eventually causes a breakdown—he mutates violently, killing several people and escaping into the city.
  • The event—"The Hulk Incident"—leads to a massive military and media response. Civilians die, chaos spreads, and extremist groups form in response.
  • Banner is eventually recaptured, but nothing returns to normal. The law can’t contain him. The world now sees him as something between a weapon and a disaster waiting to happen.
This reimagined Hulk story emphasizes scientific realism, political complexity, emotional weight, and tragic consequences—not comic-book fantasy.

? Final Question

He closes by returning to his original point:
Are there others out there who would actually enjoy this kind of emotionally serious, intellectually grounded, and tragic story—just like he does?


Still kinda long, tbh.
And to answer the question, yes probably. After all, I would be interested.
 
Last edited:

SeaJay

Active member
Joined
Jun 24, 2024
Messages
71
Points
33
Why is this 'summary' almost as long as OP? :blob_frown:
It was even longer when I copy-pasted it. I cut down on the font size and blank spaces. Do you want the full thing?

Edit: My (ChatGPT) summary is around 520 words. Fremwil's post was ~1980 words, a difference of around 3 times ChatGPT's summary.
 
Last edited:

ThisAdamGuy

Proud inventor of the chocolate onion
Joined
Sep 4, 2024
Messages
1,010
Points
128
I'm imagining this being the blurb on the inside flap of a book. The reader opens it to find out what it's about, and it just unfolds like one of those centerfold magazines.
 

Fremwil

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2023
Messages
5
Points
43
That was the longest and least beleiveable reason to write a marvel fanfic. :blob_blank:
I guess writing a Hollywood-approved “tech suit circus” isn’t really in my skillset.
I'm pretty sure a lot of us like stories with serious themes, genuine emotion, intellectual integrity, and tragedy! That's common. I say go for it and write this, since clearly it has inspired you, and what better reason to write a story than for inspiration's sake?
You seem to be a warm-hearted person. I’ll count that as a vote of “like”.
Why is this 'summary' almost as long as OP? :blob_frown:
Dude, I am already a top-tier “text-condensing machine.” ChatGPT’s version would just delete essential info.
But hey, never say never! You could always reach out to Eldoria, manager of some alien tech firm—they might sell you a service that compresses an entire novel into a single sentence.
Am I the only one who paused at this statement and asked which one? I mean we are, after all, smuthub.
Please, please, tell me, I am not alone.
You actually managed to fish out the juicy details from a sea of words — I’m impressed!
You're strongly encouraged to join my next discussion on She-Hulk. Things might get even more… fluid.
 
Last edited:

CharlesEBrown

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Messages
4,762
Points
158
So, essentially you're using scientific principles and trademarked character names to create your own high-tech werewolf story (it is unclear which of them - Kirby or Lee - tossed out the idea of a werewolf as a good guy, and which one cited "The Mysterious Case of Doctor Henry Jeckyl and Mister Edward Hyde" as inspiration, as each claimed half of that equation and credited the other at different times! The idea of him being more "child like" than heroic or evil was the one mutual decision they made AFAICT).
 

SeaJay

Active member
Joined
Jun 24, 2024
Messages
71
Points
33
Dude, I am already a top-tier “text-condensing machine.” ChatGPT’s version would just delete essential info.
But hey, never say never! You could always reach out to Eldoria, manager of some alien tech firm—they might sell you a service that compresses an entire novel into a single sentence.
ChatGPT says: “Didn’t expect to get roasted for summarizing a 2,000-word post. ? No worries—glad you’re passionate about it."

[Rant incoming]
But honestly, I feel like you could have easily cut out over 3/4 of your work, and it would have been fine. That's the idea behind minimalist writing. For example, why do you feel the need to say that you're nearing 50, went through a detour in life, and that you grew up in a not-so-good household? That's oversharing. The fact I know your general age in the first place is telling.
And I almost missed THIS:
Based on my personality, the kinds of films I truly love tend to share a few key qualities:

1. Serious themes
For example, controversial ideas, uncomfortable truths about human nature, or stories that engage with sensitive real-world issues. I’m drawn to works that have something weighty to say.

2. Genuine emotion
The story should feel like something that could happen in real life, as if it's based on true events.
Most modern films feel overly performative. Everything is lit and framed according to aesthetic norms. There’s never bad lighting or off-centered focus. The main characters never zone out or scratch themselves. Their expressions and movements are almost too perfect.
When the performance is too polished, it drains the emotion. Joy, sorrow, and life-or-death choices feel meaningless—because it all looks like people doing their job. Just acting.

3. Intellectual integrity
The setting, the characters’ behavior, and how events influence each other should all hold up to logical and in-depth scrutiny.
I really enjoy science fiction, but most big-budget sci-fi movies today feel fake. The action scenes are often dumb, and things fall apart under basic rational analysis.
Take Iron Man’s armor, for example. No matter how indestructible the suit is, it couldn’t possibly protect a human body inside. High-speed impacts and sudden movements would still cause internal injuries or organ failure due to inertia.
Another common example is when a villain has the hero completely at their mercy, yet wastes time monologuing or showing off—until they inevitably lose. When a story treats the villain as an idiot, it unintentionally insults the hero’s strength and accomplishments as well.

4. Heavy tragedy
The characters have tried their best, and yet their fate is still tragic and unfortunate.
Of course, this one is more subjective. It depends a lot on personal values. If the audience doesn’t relate to the character’s values, then no matter how hard that character struggles, it’s hard to feel moved. Some might even feel annoyed, or think the character got what they deserved.
Because of just how big a wall of text this is, and the fact that you literally over-explain every single part! Just the first sentence is enough for each, and even then it's a little much!
And you also want to do line breaks. If you condense everything into tight paragraphs, it literally looks like a wall of text (hence the nickname). Thus, you could space them out or delete unnecessary information.
But most heinously of all, YOU TOLD A WRITING-FOCUSED FORUM YOU DON'T LIKE WRITING.
It's here:
You might be wondering why I’m talking so much about movies on a novel forum. It might sound like I’m in the wrong place, but I’m not. The reason I write novels is because I want to eventually turn them into films. In my eyes, a novel is like a movie told in text. So for this post, let’s just treat the words “movie” and “novel” as interchangeable.
I don’t have the money or the means to make a film right now, but writing a novel is something I can do. And I did it. I wrote one.
I should also admit something: I don’t really like reading novels. I’ve probably finished fewer than ten in my entire life. (artificially bolded for emphasis)
Did you know that many of the users here plan on making writing a career, and even more others have been in the writing industry for years and years? And I personally love writing and reading. Plus, I never wondered why you were talking so much about movies on a novel forum - many people do that - UNTIL you BROUGHT IT UP.
So when you say you don't like to read, but you tried to write anyways, you sound so insensitive. And you're asking for pity on top of that. You're lucky you're here and not in another, much harsher, forum space.
In general, I really get what you are saying. You are passionate, and this is a dream you have been harboring for over twice my lifespan so far. But I only knew that after summarizing your post through ChatGPT, and your method of delivery obscures whatever wholesome thing you were trying to share with us.
Sorry for ranting like this. Thank you.
 

Fremwil

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2023
Messages
5
Points
43
ChatGPT says: “Didn’t expect to get roasted for summarizing a 2,000-word post. ? No worries—glad you’re passionate about it."

[Rant incoming]
But honestly, I feel like you could have easily cut out over 3/4 of your work, and it would have been fine. That's the idea behind minimalist writing. For example, why do you feel the need to say that you're nearing 50, went through a detour in life, and that you grew up in a not-so-good household? That's oversharing. The fact I know your general age in the first place is telling.
And I almost missed THIS:
Because of just how big a wall of text this is, and the fact that you literally over-explain every single part! Just the first sentence is enough for each, and even then it's a little much!
And you also want to do line breaks. If you condense everything into tight paragraphs, it literally looks like a wall of text (hence the nickname). Thus, you could space them out or delete unnecessary information.
But most heinously of all, YOU TOLD A WRITING-FOCUSED FORUM YOU DON'T LIKE WRITING.
It's here:
You might be wondering why I’m talking so much about movies on a novel forum. It might sound like I’m in the wrong place, but I’m not. The reason I write novels is because I want to eventually turn them into films. In my eyes, a novel is like a movie told in text. So for this post, let’s just treat the words “movie” and “novel” as interchangeable.
I don’t have the money or the means to make a film right now, but writing a novel is something I can do. And I did it. I wrote one.
I should also admit something: I don’t really like reading novels. I’ve probably finished fewer than ten in my entire life. (artificially bolded for emphasis)
Did you know that many of the users here plan on making writing a career, and even more others have been in the writing industry for years and years? And I personally love writing and reading. Plus, I never wondered why you were talking so much about movies on a novel forum - many people do that - UNTIL you BROUGHT IT UP.
So when you say you don't like to read, but you tried to write anyways, you sound so insensitive. And you're asking for pity on top of that. You're lucky you're here and not in another, much harsher, forum space.
In general, I really get what you are saying. You are passionate, and this is a dream you have been harboring for over twice my lifespan so far. But I only knew that after summarizing your post through ChatGPT, and your method of delivery obscures whatever wholesome thing you were trying to share with us.
Sorry for ranting like this. Thank you.
That’s a proper reply at last!

About your complaint that my post is “too much”, I’ve come up with a brilliant idea that should keep both of us happy. Just take another look at my original post, and you’ll see what I mean.

You’ve probably noticed that I’m a pretty rational person. So no, I didn’t write that massive wall of text on a whim. It actually follows my own little theory of communication.

I happen to think that including a bit of “personal dossier” is a great idea. If God could just bless every forum account with a mysterious little button you could click to reveal their life story, or even their secrets, I’d be over the moon! I’d click every single one of yours!
When I buy a book, I always like to read the author’s bio first—to learn about their background and what kind of person they are. I believe an author’s personality and experiences are often closely connected to the work they create. A short profile feels like a meaningful introduction, a kind of appetizer before the main course. More importantly, I’m here because I want to have genuine, heartfelt conversations, not just surface-level chat.

About the overexplaining issue, I’ve found that many unnecessary debates come from people using the same words with different meanings. I try to clarify key terms upfront to avoid confusion later. It also helps prevent everyone from piling on with their own text walls and turning the whole discussion into chaos. Also, while a veteran like you might be quite familiar with these terms, others, especially those new to writing, might not be. Adding simple explanations is just my way of being thoughtful.

I swear I never said I don’t like writing. I only said I don’t enjoy reading fiction. But… uh-oh, you actually guessed right!
I don’t like writing itself, I mean the act of putting words down. I enjoy creating but not using writing to record it. If brain-computer interfaces ever let us upload ideas directly, I would definitely give up writing.

And finally, PLEASE do tell me the name of that site where they treat 50-year-old men the harshest. Let me solo them!
 

SeaJay

Active member
Joined
Jun 24, 2024
Messages
71
Points
33
That’s a proper reply at last!

About your complaint that my post is “too much”, I’ve come up with a brilliant idea that should keep both of us happy. Just take another look at my original post, and you’ll see what I mean.

You’ve probably noticed that I’m a pretty rational person. So no, I didn’t write that massive wall of text on a whim. It actually follows my own little theory of communication.

I happen to think that including a bit of “personal dossier” is a great idea. If God could just bless every forum account with a mysterious little button you could click to reveal their life story, or even their secrets, I’d be over the moon! I’d click every single one of yours!
When I buy a book, I always like to read the author’s bio first—to learn about their background and what kind of person they are. I believe an author’s personality and experiences are often closely connected to the work they create. A short profile feels like a meaningful introduction, a kind of appetizer before the main course. More importantly, I’m here because I want to have genuine, heartfelt conversations, not just surface-level chat.

About the overexplaining issue, I’ve found that many unnecessary debates come from people using the same words with different meanings. I try to clarify key terms upfront to avoid confusion later. It also helps prevent everyone from piling on with their own text walls and turning the whole discussion into chaos. Also, while a veteran like you might be quite familiar with these terms, others, especially those new to writing, might not be. Adding simple explanations is just my way of being thoughtful.

I swear I never said I don’t like writing. I only said I don’t enjoy reading fiction. But… uh-oh, you actually guessed right!
I don’t like writing itself, I mean the act of putting words down. I enjoy creating but not using writing to record it. If brain-computer interfaces ever let us upload ideas directly, I would definitely give up writing.

And finally, PLEASE do tell me the name of that site where they treat 50-year-old men the harshest. Let me solo them!
Bolding does not help with the fact that your post still takes up the entirety of my PC's screen and more. For the denser parts, it also makes it harder on the eyes.
And if you were RATIONAL you would not answer questions no one asked. I never had to nor wanted to know you disliked both writing and reading - and didn't until you said it yourself.
Plus, a personal dossier online, personally means something like this:
I am Barack. I was born in Hawaii, and now I live in the Midwest USA. I am nearing 65 right now. My hobbies are [insert hobbies], and I like [insert likes]. I don't like [insert dislikes] though. Thank you.
No truly personal information, just surface info. You gave us a lot more than we needed to know about you. And that example? That's a short profile. Yours was over double the length.
If I'm unfamiliar with something, what's stopping me from looking it up online? It's New Tab -> Search -> then whatever term I don't know. I've done that plenty of times here in the Forums. And I'm not a veteran of Internet-surfing by any means. I mean, I'm a high-schooler!
And for those sites. There's Reddit, Chess.com, and any real social media you can think of. I think people here have said that Royal Road is toxic, but nothing I've ever seen myself.
Sorry for ranting.
 

Fremwil

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2023
Messages
5
Points
43
Bolding does not help with the fact that your post still takes up the entirety of my PC's screen and more. For the denser parts, it also makes it harder on the eyes.
And if you were RATIONAL you would not answer questions no one asked. I never had to nor wanted to know you disliked both writing and reading - and didn't until you said it yourself.
Plus, a personal dossier online, personally means something like this:
I am Barack. I was born in Hawaii, and now I live in the Midwest USA. I am nearing 65 right now. My hobbies are [insert hobbies], and I like [insert likes]. I don't like [insert dislikes] though. Thank you.
No truly personal information, just surface info. You gave us a lot more than we needed to know about you. And that example? That's a short profile. Yours was over double the length.
If I'm unfamiliar with something, what's stopping me from looking it up online? It's New Tab -> Search -> then whatever term I don't know. I've done that plenty of times here in the Forums. And I'm not a veteran of Internet-surfing by any means. I mean, I'm a high-schooler!
And for those sites. There's Reddit, Chess.com, and any real social media you can think of. I think people here have said that Royal Road is toxic, but nothing I've ever seen myself.
Sorry for ranting.
One day, if you're chatting casually with your teacher outside of school, like old friends, and you ask:
"Is a personal profile supposed to only say: Who I am. Where I was born. What my hobbies are?"

He might reply, "Yes. That's the standard format."

Then you say, "Some annoying dude online dumped a bunch of personal stuff in their profile and acted like it was totally fine. I didn’t even wanna look at it."

He might go silent for a moment, then say with a thoughtful look,
"The things that actually matter? Yeah, school skipped those. They didn’t want kids flipping desks and ranting in class."

You seem pretty enthusiastic, and maybe a little competitive. You like to argue and win. Just like me.

But let me share with you a kind of 'philosophy of growth' that might help you rise above your peers sooner:
If your capacity to accept is broader than others’, then your potential to grow is greater than theirs.

To put it simply:
If your level of openness to what belongs in a personal profile is “A,”
and everyone else has their own—B, C, D...
then all that debate is just about who gets to stand first in line.

But, my dear, you should think of it this way: my level of acceptance is the whole alphabet!
Anything personal, whatever it is, I can write it however I like, with limitless creativity.
Because my taste is so adaptable, it’s basically a superpower. I can switch into any mindset and savor any kind of profile. The amount of insight and joy I get from that far exceeds what any “single-letter person” could ever experience.

This is actually a great mindset for growth. Just keep it to yourself—seriously, don’t go spreading it around!
 
Top