What even is "bad grammar"

FieryLou

Phoeperor of the Phoenix Race.
Joined
Apr 18, 2025
Messages
212
Points
63
I'll come at this from a different angle that will frustrate non-native speakers even more.

There are 2 versions of English. British English and American English. There are grammar differences between them. Grammar, in essence, are the 'rules' that determine the flow of the language. There are basic rules about the order of subjects and verbs, and where adjectives go.

The frustrating thing for non-natives is that, actually, native speakers violate the written rules all the time. English is full of exceptions to the rule. British and American english violate different rules from each other too. It's generally easy for native speakers to see when a writer, even a very skilled writer, is non-native because they adhere to the rules more than the exceptions. It makes the language seem programmatic, and English is full of violations of its own rules.

I would argue that English, more than almost any other language, is the hardest to sound fluent in. I have family that have lived in the US for 40 years and still don't sound fluent. It's close, but not perfect. Or rather, it's *TOO* perfect, and that's the problem.
So in short, a non-native speaker may be too 'good' at English, and because native speakers don't always follow strict grammar rules, they might think of it as 'wrong'. Edit: Too "good" may not be the right word.... They follow the rules too closely.
 

MasterY001

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2025
Messages
371
Points
108
Bad grammar is this:




Now, excuse me, I'll go to find a holy water to cleanse my Ctrl, C, and V buttons.
I was just about to have brunch before I read this. I think you spoiled my appetite.

Where did you even find these paragraphs of hot garbage?
 

StoneInky

Heart of Stone, Head of Ink
Joined
Jun 24, 2024
Messages
445
Points
108
So in short, a non-native speaker may be too 'good' at English, and because native speakers don't always follow strict grammar rules, they might think of it as 'wrong'. Edit: Too "good" may not be the right word.... They follow the rules too closely.
Remember that this only applies to informal situations.

Situations like writing a novel? If readers complain about the grammar, THIS IS NOT THE REASON.
 
D

Deleted member 84247

Guest
So in short, a non-native speaker may be too 'good' at English, and because native speakers don't always follow strict grammar rules, they might think of it as 'wrong'. Edit: Too "good" may not be the right word.... They follow the rules too closely.
It's basically the same thing when other people learn your native language, I'd imagine. People who learn languages usually learn the most formal version of that language. Any shortcuts and slang are usually learned later.
 

Macha

{$user.user_title}
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
888
Points
133
It's basically the same thing when other people learn your native language, I'd imagine. People who learn languages usually learn the most formal version of that language. Any shortcuts and slang are usually learned later.
I will make sure you learn these words first.

Fuck = Đụ/Đéo/Địt
Shit = Cứt/Phân
Damn = mẹ nó/má nó
Bitch = con đĩ/con đĩ chó
God dammit = trời hỡi/trời ơi
fuck you too = con mẹ mày
Asshole = lỗ đít (butthole) or "thằng khốn" (jerk).
What an ass = "thằng chó"/"thằng khốn"
Piss off/fuck off = biến mẹ mày đi/cút đi/biến đi
Bastard = See asshole above. You can use "Thằng khốn nạn"/"Thằng khốn kiếp".
idiot = ngu/ngu ngốc/ngốc
son of a bitch = "đồ con hoang"/"đồ chó đẻ".
bullshit = "tào lao"/"vớ vẫn"/"nhảm cứt".
 

Tyranomaster

Guy who writes stuff
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Messages
746
Points
133
Remember that this only applies to informal situations.

Situations like writing a novel? If readers complain about the grammar, THIS IS NOT THE REASON.
It applies to informal and some formal situations. If readers complain about grammar, they mean bad grammar. This is 100% correct. When readers complain about flow, ease of reading, or even sometimes pacing, they often actually mean grammar formality.

I break grammar rules all the time, from run on sentences to incomplete sentences. I've had readers literally say it reads very naturally, and despite difficult subject matters like material sciences, it was easy to read. The 'bad grammar' there leads to it reading how it would be spoken, because I write how I talk, not how grammarly would tell me to write.
 

FieryLou

Phoeperor of the Phoenix Race.
Joined
Apr 18, 2025
Messages
212
Points
63
I will make sure you learn these words first.

Fuck = Đụ/Đéo/Địt
Shit = Cứt/Phân
Damn = mẹ nó/má nó
Bitch = con đĩ/con đĩ chó
God dammit = trời hỡi/trời ơi
fuck you too = con mẹ mày
Asshole = lỗ đít (butthole) or "thằng khốn" (jerk).
What an ass = "thằng chó"/"thằng khốn"
Piss off/fuck off = biến mẹ mày đi/cút đi/biến đi
Bastard = See asshole above. You can use "Thằng khốn nạn"/"Thằng khốn kiếp".
idiot = ngu/ngu ngốc/ngốc
son of a bitch = "đồ con hoang"/"đồ chó đẻ".
bullshit = "tào lao"/"vớ vẫn"/"nhảm cứt".
Tôi viết tiếng Anh của bạn thế nào?
 

FieryLou

Phoeperor of the Phoenix Race.
Joined
Apr 18, 2025
Messages
212
Points
63
Bad grammar is grammar that you do not see as correct.
raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_ca443f4786.u2.jpg
 

RedMuffin

OwO
Joined
May 6, 2024
Messages
997
Points
108
Bad grammar is this:




Now, excuse me, I'll go to find a holy water to cleanse my Ctrl, C, and V buttons.
I see no problems in that text.

...And that's concerning since I'm studying English in university and my grammar is supposed to be B2... :blob_dizzy::blob_no::sweating_profusely:

Edit: The reason I couldn't see the problems was, literally, because I couldn't see them as my eyes automatically skipped the text. So far I've found around a dozen punctuation errors and a few spelling mistake.

Edit 2: I only read the first text, so...

Edit 3: I think I have gone blind.
 
Last edited:

Azure_Fog

More stabby, more happy~
Joined
Sep 5, 2023
Messages
271
Points
133
Hiya~ I’ma throw my 2 cents in..
As a native speakers I find that “bad grammar” is generally not bad grammar but.. something else? Not quite “bad writing” but it just feels off.
(There are exceptions.. Ive read a few stories with grammar so bad I had to stop reading…)

I’ll try to elaborate on this a bit~ Personally, finding the right amount of a grammar to use and matching how your character speaks are what qualify as “good grammar”. Anyways~
As a non-native English speaker, I often ask myself what viewers mean by 'bad' grammar. Can someone give me an example? Is it beyond the right word choice and spelling? It's always hard to judge if my grammar is good or not if I don't know what people base grammar quality on.
Here’s my first example: your post. This fits exactly what I described above—it feels off.

I’d say that you’re using too much grammar in a way? And it also kinda doesn’t flow. Each individual sentence in a vacuum is fine, but placed together in context it feels wrong.
Can someone give me an example?
This sentence to me feels wrong, out of place. It’s a fine sentence, but feels off. (If I had written this post I’d say “Can I have an example?”)

Also using “beyond” in the manner you did doesn’t really work. It gets the point across, but feels wrong and is technically (I think).

Read this:
As a non-native English speaker, I often ask myself what viewers mean by 'bad' grammar. Can I have an example? Is it more than the right word choice and spelling? It's hard to judge if my grammar is good or not if I don't know what people base grammar quality on.
I made 3 changes. 2 are highlighted in red, and then I removed “always” in the last sentence.

Why remove the always? It feels right. But also
I think it violates the maxim of quantity (basically you generally convey the amount of information needed, and no more or less. If you want to learn more, look it up). The always is implied so adding it is redundant and feels off.
No, thank you. I used it for quite some time, even the premium version, but it did not make me more confident in my own abilities. Also, Grammarly's comma placement is often weird. Grammarly is nice for the correction of spelling mistakes, however, it won't correct you if you use the wrong word.
I’m going to just dump my edited version here and explain after…
No thanks. I used it for quite some time, even the premium version, but it didn’t make me more confident in my own abilities. Also, Grammarly's comma placement is often weird. It is nice for the correction of spelling mistakes, but it won't correct you if you use the wrong word.
Almost all of these changes are for tone. The original text is far too formal. This is a random thread not a piece of formal writing so it felt off.

First change, changed “No, thank you” to
“No thanks”. Might be breaking some rules here. I dunno~ but the important part is removing the comma. Thanks or thank you, doesn’t matter. That part is your voice—How do you want to sound? The comma adds formality and makes everything feel off, hence* its removal.

Changing “did not” to “didnt” is again just making everything less formal.

Changing the second grammarly to “it” is done because the subject (grammarly) should already be known from the previous context. Pronouns exist for a reason~

My last change was changing “however” to “but”. Same thing: reducing formality. However, the comma after however could be left in. I removed it because that’s how I want the sentence to be paced. However, if you want a pause afterwards, keep the comma. This is more of a voice thing again.

*I tend to use some fancier words like “hence” but it doesn’t break the flow.. and just above I used however. I wouldn’t consider this to be formal writing, so, why’s it feel okay? I think it’s because I shift my tone to be formal, thus making it fit in. I dunno honestly~
So in short, a non-native speaker may be too 'good' at English, and because native speakers don't always follow strict grammar rules, they might think of it as 'wrong'. Edit: Too "good" may not be the right word.... They follow the rules too closely.
This above text is great and I have no comments on it~ To me, this sounds like a native speaker.
 

FieryLou

Phoeperor of the Phoenix Race.
Joined
Apr 18, 2025
Messages
212
Points
63
Hiya~ I’ma throw my 2 cents in..
As a native speakers I find that “bad grammar” is generally not bad grammar but.. something else? Not quite “bad writing” but it just feels off.
(There are exceptions.. Ive read a few stories with grammar so bad I had to stop reading…)

I’ll try to elaborate on this a bit~ Personally, finding the right amount of a grammar to use and matching how your character speaks are what qualify as “good grammar”. Anyways~

Here’s my first example: your post. This fits exactly what I described above—it feels off.

I’d say that you’re using too much grammar in a way? And it also kinda doesn’t flow. Each individual sentence in a vacuum is fine, but placed together in context it feels wrong.

This sentence to me feels wrong, out of place. It’s a fine sentence, but feels off. (If I had written this post I’d say “Can I have an example?”)

Also using “beyond” in the manner you did doesn’t really work. It gets the point across, but feels wrong and is technically (I think).

Read this:

I made 3 changes. 2 are highlighted in red, and then I removed “always” in the last sentence.

Why remove the always? It feels right. But also
I think it violates the maxim of quantity (basically you generally convey the amount of information needed, and no more or less. If you want to learn more, look it up). The always is implied so adding it is redundant and feels off.

I’m going to just dump my edited version here and explain after…

Almost all of these changes are for tone. The original text is far too formal. This is a random thread not a piece of formal writing so it felt off.

First change, changed “No, thank you” to
“No thanks”. Might be breaking some rules here. I dunno~ but the important part is removing the comma. Thanks or thank you, doesn’t matter. That part is your voice—How do you want to sound? The comma adds formality and makes everything feel off, hence* its removal.

Changing “did not” to “didnt” is again just making everything less formal.

Changing the second grammarly to “it” is done because the subject (grammarly) should already be known from the previous context. Pronouns exist for a reason~

My last change was changing “however” to “but”. Same thing: reducing formality. However, the comma after however could be left in. I removed it because that’s how I want the sentence to be paced. However, if you want a pause afterwards, keep the comma. This is more of a voice thing again.

*I tend to use some fancier words like “hence” but it doesn’t break the flow.. and just above I used however. I wouldn’t consider this to be formal writing, so, why’s it feel okay? I think it’s because I shift my tone to be formal, thus making it fit in. I dunno honestly~

This above text is great and I have no comments on it~ To me, this sounds like a native speaker.
I can work with this. "Thanks" The reason I often use a more formal tone is because that's how I learned it in school. We needed to use a formal tone to get the full amount of points. This only applies to narration, though. When it comes to conversations, I never give a fuck about formal tone, as it is not supposed to be formal.
 

Azure_Fog

More stabby, more happy~
Joined
Sep 5, 2023
Messages
271
Points
133
I can work with this. "Thanks" The reason I often use a more formal tone is because that's how I learned it in school. We needed to use a formal tone to get the full amount of points. This only applies to narration, though. When it comes to conversations, I never give a fuck about formal tone, as it is not supposed to be formal.
I see~ makes sense..
also iyou don’t mind me nitpicking you English:
I can work with this. "Thanks" The reason I often use a more formal tone is because that's how I learned it in school. We needed to use a formal tone to get the full amount of points. That only applies to narration, though. When it comes to conversations, I never gave a fuck about formal tone, as it is not supposed to be formal.
The changes with “full points” is because the removed parts are unnecessary.. and that change and the give to gave change is maintaining the tense/mood (idk which one it is.. probably tense..?)
 

FieryLou

Phoeperor of the Phoenix Race.
Joined
Apr 18, 2025
Messages
212
Points
63
I see~ makes sense..
also iyou don’t mind me nitpicking you English:
The changes with “full points” is because the removed parts are unnecessary.. and that change and the give to gave change is maintaining the tense/mood (idk which one it is.. probably tense..?)
I used "give" because I still write, and feel like it. But yeah, its fine.
 

Azure_Fog

More stabby, more happy~
Joined
Sep 5, 2023
Messages
271
Points
133
I used "give" because I still write, and feel like it. But yeah, its fine.
yeah that makes sense~ however if you want to express that I’d either emphasize it separately or use a different tense/mood like “I have never given”
 
Top