Adventurer's Guild Adventurer's Guild - OOC Room

[Himekawa]

@ohko are you ready to finalize the prices? Also can room with board be 9G, so that adventurer save 1G at a time?

 

[Himekawa]

guys... how about making two threads for quest report? It feels quite messy with the current setup. Having quest report in one thread, and quest evaluation in another while maintaining both index to be the same seem neater.

 

[Nahrenne]

But they let me post it in one go? It is because the tutorial quest is that easy that there are no twist at all (except for making friends. That one is really, really hard).

Ahhh, is that so?
I see.
The one quest per post is for non-tutorial ones, then?
@Leegood *points to Hime's post*

X

 

[Himekawa]

Ahhh, is that so?
I see.
The one quest per post is for non-tutorial ones, then?
@Leegood *points to Hime's post*

X

my logic is that any adventurer beyond his first day would know the answer to those (again, except the making friends quest).

 

[Nahrenne]

guys... how about making two threads for quest report? It feels quite messy with the current setup. Having quest report in one thread, and quest evaluation in another while maintaining both index to be the same seem neater.

You mean like a Quest Submission thread and a Quest Evaluation/Assessment thread?

X

 

[ohko]

But they let me post it in one go? It is because the tutorial quest is that easy that there are no twist at all (except for making friends. That one is really, really hard).

Ah, this was brought up a few times before. Please try to avoid doing multiple quests in a single report:

Can I report two quests in a single report

Please don’t combine multiple quests into a single report.

For OOC reasons, we feel that it is unbalanced to gain double (or triple or quadruple) the exp for a similar amount of writing. Since this is a writing game, we encourage players to split each quest into its own report.

Just separate each quest into its own post.

^ See above

@ohko are you ready to finalize the prices? Also can room with board be 9G, so that adventurer save 1G at a time?

Still writing to an extent. The prices posted earlier in this thread are definitely the working prices for now, so feedback on them is definitely really helpful!

As for room + board -- I think I still favor 10 G because it's easiest for players to just deduct a round whole 10 G for living expenses. If you wanted to spend the time micro-managing your finances, you could probably take room (5G) and eat bread (1G), which would give you 4G of savings. However, for the players that don't want to do that kind of micromanaging -- it's way easier to remember "10G = 1 day living expenses".

Rather than changing daily living expenses, I think it's much more likely that the quest rewards will change extensively once there are new market prices anyhow. A few players wanted more scaling to monetary rewards as players level up, potions are more expensive now, and a few players suggested a reward based on level.

guys... how about making two threads for quest report? It feels quite messy with the current setup. Having quest report in one thread, and quest evaluation in another while maintaining both index to be the same seem neater.

What do others think? I'm up for this if other people feel like this is worthwhile.

 

[Himekawa]

You mean like a Quest Submission thread and a Quest Evaluation/Assessment thread?

X

I want a neater system.

 

[Nahrenne]

my logic is that any adventurer beyond his first day would know the answer to those (again, except the making friends quest).

>w>
<w<
I don't think Liana actually knows the name of the world yet...
>w>
<w<
And since she's under compulsion from her sire, she doesn't have an established routine.
'-'
X

 

[Nahrenne]

I want a neater system.

*tilts head*
Neater how?


X

 

[AliceShiki]

But they let me post it in one go? It is because the tutorial quest is that easy that there are no twist at all (except for making friends. That one is really, really hard).

Probably because Zoey wasn't around when we were discussing this and he was the first one to get to your quest.

guys... how about making two threads for quest report? It feels quite messy with the current setup. Having quest report in one thread, and quest evaluation in another while maintaining both index to be the same seem neater.

What do others think? I'm up for this if other people feel like this is worthwhile.

I don't quite get the necessity of it? I mean... It feels like more work for the people evaluating (since we need to change threads to post the evaluation) without any real benefits aside from a tad more organization.

Would also be annoying for when I'm trying to read everything in order that they were posted because I'd need to keep comparing timestamps and stuff, so... I kinda prefer the current system tbh... >.>

 

[Himekawa]

*tilts head*
Neater how?


X

Well.. one upside is that with the index there, the reviewer can just see the index and write the corresponding evaluation. though it had to be processed first in first out.

 

[GM]

Well.. one upside is that with the index there, the reviewer can just see the index and write the corresponding evaluation. though it had to be processed first in first out.

I don't think reviewers always evaluate first-in-first-out.

Part of it is because sometimes players tag a receptionist they want, or a player jumps onto OCC asking for their report to evaluated immediately, and other times receptionists just skip to reports they want to evaluate. And then players themselves are reviewers, so their own quest report can get buried if they review a lot of other people's reports.

 

[Himekawa]

This post is #1993. we looked at the corresponding quest evaluation at the same number. well, for me it is common for me to open 3 windows of firefox (hooray for i3wm) So comparing the two is easy.

 

[Himekawa]

I don't think reviewers always evaluate first-in-first-out.

Part of it is because sometimes players tag a receptionist they want, or a player jumps onto OCC asking for their report to evaluated immediately, and other times receptionists just skip to reports they want to evaluate. And then players themselves are reviewers, so their own quest report can get buried if they review a lot of other people's reports.

yep. This is the problem, if we implement this. I want to see something neater though.

 

[Nahrenne]

Well.. one upside is that with the index there, the reviewer can just see the index and write the corresponding evaluation. though it had to be processed first in first out.

Index?

X

 

[GM]

yep. This is the problem, if we implement this. I want to see something neater though.

I think @Feathers95 's suggestion about getting either receptionists or quest reports to stick something at the top of their report would just be easier.

Like a big:

QUEST REPORT

or

QUEST EVALUATION

 

[Himekawa]

Index?

X

I don't load images and other media content due to my limited data plan. what is that?

 

[Himekawa]

I think @Feathers95 's suggestion about getting either receptionists or quest reports to stick something at the top of their report would just be easier.

Like a big:

QUEST REPORT

or

QUEST EVALUATION

yeah. that will be an improvement. now standardize it?

 

[Nahrenne]

I don't load images and other media content due to my limited data plan. what is that?

???
Why are you talking about images and data plans?

X

 

[Himekawa]

???
Why are you talking about images and data plans?

X

I assume there is something like an emoticon or something there? is there?