Your thoughts on humanoid beings that have aerokinetic abilities

OP1000

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2021
Messages
387
Points
83
Hello!!!!
Are there any humanoid beings (monsters) that you like or dislike that have abilities related to the manipulation of air one way or another?
 

Jemini

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Messages
2,037
Points
153
Err... can I list my own character? And does it count if she uses more than one element? There was an infiltration scene where she had to siege a city and her use of a combination of wind magic and an improvised glide-suit, neither of which were quite optimized, was an important part of the opening salvo of attacks to cover their entrance.
 

BearlyAlive

I'm not savage, you're just average
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
1,981
Points
153
Everything with wings that're either too big or too small to actually use. But yeah, Sylphs are literally wind spirits. Harpies are a fantasy classic as well. Also ravens or any kind of bird.

And dragons, I guess. Those pretentious lizards with delusions of grandeur...
 

Jemini

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Messages
2,037
Points
153
And dragons, I guess. Those pretentious lizards with delusions of grandeur...

*looks up original definition of dragon*

Hmm... funny. I see nothing about reptilians or delusions in the definition. Plenty of grandure though. And a lot of evil too. They're often the things that the gods slay and build the world off their corpse, or the things that end the world and kill all the gods.

The reptilian stuff, believe it or not, actually came later. Tiamat and her husband Absu, the two oldest recorded mythological dragons in all mythology, are not actually described at all. The only thing mentioned about them is the fact that Tiamat is connected in some way to the ocean, and Absu is connected in some way to fresh water. They are not even CALLED dragons in the text. We only give them what are considered draconic features in modern-day interpretations because the "dragon" label was attached to them retroactively.
 
Last edited:

BearlyAlive

I'm not savage, you're just average
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
1,981
Points
153
The reptilian stuff, believe it or not, actually came later. Tiamat and her husband Absu, the two oldest recorded mythological dragons in all mythology, are not actually described at all. The only thing mentioned about them is the fact that Tiamat is connected in some way to the ocean, and Absu is connected in some way to fresh water. They are not even CALLED dragons in the text. We only give them what are considered draconic features in modern-day interpretations because the "dragon" label was attached to them retroactively.
As far as I know Tiamat being a dragon is more of a popculture thing than mythological. They're not exactly Dragons but beings that fit the same niche "Dragons" just seem to make better boss monsters than a giant whale or turtle, just because they're easier to make meanacing.
 
Top