Seaspecter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2022
- Messages
- 700
- Points
- 133
Excuse you? Women married or not can wear what they please.A married woman should not be showing that much skin. Unless they're poly, then that's different.
Excuse you? Women married or not can wear what they please.A married woman should not be showing that much skin. Unless they're poly, then that's different.
Well, of course they can. But can and should are two different things. Seems a lot of people don't understand that. I can steal from the bank, but I should not do it.Excuse you? Women married or not can wear what they please.
Women also shouldn't be poly.A married woman should not be showing that much skin. Unless they're poly, then that's different.
No comment. I don't want to get incinerated.Women also shouldn't be poly.
A person's choice in clothing is nothing like the act of stealing you really can't compare those two things.Well, of course they can. But can and should are two different things. Seems a lot of people don't understand that. I can steal from the back, but I should not do it.
And why not?Women also shouldn't be poly.
??????????????No comment. I don't want to get incinerated.
The point wasn't the morality behind it. The point was the possible consequences of such actions from a social standpoint. I can't control what people will do or how they will react. Stealing from the bank, you can do it but social consequences include police and other forces coming after you.A person's choice in clothing is nothing like the act of stealing you really can't compare those two things.
Depends on what you mean by poly. If they're not doing anything physical, no one cares. If they are having sex though it's only not sin when it's done by husband and wife.A person's choice in clothing is nothing like the act of stealing you really can't compare those two things.
And why not?
I disagree with you here see the person harassing the woman is the problem in not the woman herself. See if you say that she should deal with the consequences of dressing to provocatively then you give the people harassing her the right to decide if what she's wearing is acceptable or not.The point wasn't the morality behind it. The point was the possible consequences of such actions from a social standpoint. I can't control what people will do or how they will react. Stealing from the bank, you can do it but social consequences include police and other forces coming after you.
A woman can dress however they want, but social consequences will occur of she dresses too provocatively. I won't be the one who says anything to them in public, nor will I even look at them, but I'm not going to be the one who rushes over to protect them if some other people bother them.
I just don't want to get involved. Just like if you were stealing from the bank, I don't want to get involved.
We don't have the same religion friend and I don't see a problem with poly couples regardless of whether or not they are jumping in the sack with each other, so I suppose we are just going to have to disagree with each other here.Depends on what you mean by poly. If they're not doing anything physical, no one cares. If they are having sex though it's only not sin when it's done by husband and wife.
Actually I take back what I said. Having multiple partners even if you're not having sex might still be adultery. So still a sin.We don't have the same religion friend and I don't see a problem with poly couples regardless of whether or not they are jumping in the sack with each other, so I suppose we are just going to have to disagree with each other here.
Fair enough so I'd suggest you don't have multiple partners then.Actually I take back what I said. Having multiple partners even if you're not having sex might still be adultery. So still a sin.
Wasn't going to happen anyway, I'm a happily married man who's been that way for the last 17 years and that isn't going to change for the rest of my life. But I'm not going to pester other people about their relationships either and I suggest you do the same.And I suggest the same to you.
Just how it goes sometimes.How did a thread about magical girl's enemies turn into this?
Hmm. Let's phrase this a bit differently: A woman shouldn't dress that way because of public indecency, and it has societal implications. However, if a woman is in need of help, you are morally obliged to help. You can't use provocative dressing as an excuse to shirk moral responsibility.A woman can dress however they want, but social consequences will occur of she dresses too provocatively. I won't be the one who says anything to them in public, nor will I even look at them, but I'm not going to be the one who rushes over to protect them if some other people bother them.
Think of this from my perspective. I believe that if you repent for your sins you will gain eternal life and inherit the kingdom of God in paradise.Wasn't going to happen anyway, I'm a happily married man who's been that way for the last 17 years and that isn't going to change for the rest of my life. But I'm not going to pester other people about their relationships either and I suggest you do the same.
Seaprecter introduces smut to the thread.How did a thread about magical girl's enemies turn into this?
If you're going to do that, focus on the main issue instead of some side morals.Think of this from my perspective. I believe that if you repent for your sins you will gain eternal life and inherit the kingdom of God in paradise.
How much do I have to hate you to choose to not even attempt to save your soul just because I don't want to be mildly annoying?
Aight. Christ is Lord.If you're going to do that, focus on the main issue instead of some side morals.
I can see it from your perspective however I've been around a while now and I have seen such utter cruelty from people who follow the same faith against all manner of people, including their own children, that I can't believe that there's no hate involved.Think of this from my perspective. I believe that if you repent for your sins you will gain eternal life and inherit the kingdom of God in paradise.
How much do I have to hate you to choose to not even attempt to save your soul just because I don't want to be mildly annoying?
never said she was the problem for how she dresses. You’re just trying to frame this in a way that justifies your viewpoint.I disagree with you here see the person harassing the woman is the problem in not the woman herself.
Hmm. Let's phrase this a bit differently: A woman shouldn't dress that way because of public indecency, and it has societal implications. However, if a woman is in need of help, you are morally obliged to help. You can't use provocative dressing as an excuse to shirk moral responsibility.