❣Single or Taken?

[Deleted member 113259]

Outwardly single, but his sister chased away all the other girls because older sisters belong with their younger brothers.

I see. So single.

 

[nowme_cres]

Hi, everyone, I have a simple question for you all.
Is your MC in any sort of romantic relationship or are they currently single?

Single. But someone will try to rizz me up in this thread lol

 

[TheEldritchGod]

Single
50% Harem/50% Dating
Dating
Widow

 

[Lloyd]

Single. But someone will try to rizz me up in this thread lol

Woman moment

 

[Rezcore]

Alright, you're free to go. Just as long as 18 is the youngest he's been in their relationship.?‍

He had a gf at 16, she had a child with him, she died. Now he's plowing his teacher

 

[APieceOfRock]

Taken...
By the thrill of riddling people with bullet holes

 

[ShipTeaser]

Escalatingly Taken...

Spoiler: So far...

Childood friend, furry faerie princess, rather insane faerie maid, rich young technology heiress, longstanding noble girl martial artist, said girl's bodyguard/best friend, and imposdibly beautiful junior at Uni who's got... issues

 

[georgelee5786]

Taken

 

[RobBanks]

Single!!! They're all single, goddamit!
Do you think all those convoluted plot twists could go forward if I also had to write a relationship around them!?!?
I'm not that smart (or dumb)!!
Isto não é uma novela da Globo crl!!!

 

[AuthorsDread]

Mine is single for the moment.

 

[Major2501]

Fray: Dating a lovely hot Swede.

Coven: Complicated. Potential romance with a guy in her year. Also sort of dating the vampire younger "brother" of her Aunts vampiric squeeze.

 

[Rockingashe]

For some reason (I'm stupid) I was thinking real life ? But He's definitely taken and I'd hate to see anyone try to stop that.

 

[TheMonotonePuppet]

A snake caused the fall of man.

It wasn't an actual snake. It was the Devil. You're making a mistake with the identity there.

 

[T.K._Paradox]

Single.

For the safety of himself and others.

 

[Deleted member 113259]

It wasn't an actual snake. It was the Devil. You're making a mistake with the identity there.

It was the devil as an actual snake.

 

[TheMonotonePuppet]

It was the devil as an actual snake.

Ehhh... to me, the snake was more symbolism. The poison its words contained, its forked tongue, etc etc.

And regardless, even if you view it very literally, is the snake not one of God's creations? I would presume that it is more a usurping of a form by the Devil, then anything that could be truly called a snake, even if it looked like a snake. Otherwise, your logic would lead to the conclusion that the Devil can, at any point, be considered one of God's creations.

Errr. Actually, now that I look into it, since the Devil was originally an angel, one could view him as one of God's creations.

I shall henceforth revise my statement to saying that the Devil, if we follow your interpretation that he was a literal, actual snake, then the Devil could at any point be one of God's good creations. This is patently absurd, since the Devil is the very origin of sin. He is in no way good in the Bible, not even in form.

So your interpretation, in summary, fails at its logical conclusion even if we entertained that the snake was not a symbol used to describe the Devil.

 

[Deleted member 113259]

Ehhh... to me, the snake was more symbolism. The poison its words contained, its forked tongue, etc etc.

And regardless, even if you view it very literally, is the snake not one of God's creations? I would presume that it is more a usurping of a form by the Devil, then anything that could be truly called a snake, even if it looked like a snake. Otherwise, your logic would lead to the conclusion that the Devil can, at any point, be considered one of God's creations.

Errr. Actually, now that I look into it, since the Devil was originally an angel, one could view him as one of God's creations.

I shall henceforth revise my statement to saying that the Devil, if we follow your interpretation that he was a literal, actual snake, then the Devil could at any point be one of God's good creations. This is patently absurd, since the Devil is the very origin of sin. He is in no way good in the Bible, not even in form.

So your interpretation, in summary, fails at its logical conclusion even if we entertained that the snake was not a symbol used to describe the Devil.

He would have to be an actual snake because the reason snakes slither is due to God punishing the serpent.

 

[TheMonotonePuppet]

He would have to be an actual snake because the reason snakes slither is due to God punishing the serpent.

You point to your own evidence, and yet fail to refute my points in turn. Do you not have anything to say to them?
And to show that my argument stands on its own, despite you not offering the same, I will still refute your evidence. Or at the very least, offer my own point of view on that subject. I view them as merely unfortunate bystanders hit by the curse set upon the Devil, being used as an reminder for humanity, who are rather favored by God in the Bible.
After all, otherwise, the Devil could have merely committed unspeakable and heinous deeds as a human, and then we would all be at fault for his acts since he was an actual human.
The more you continue your argument, the more you dig yourself into a hole because it is just illogical.

 

[Deleted member 113259]

How did I fail to argue against your points I didn't try to. Your opinion also isn't evidence. We know that snakes have been punished by God. Did it ever occur to you that humans aren't the only ones that can fall. The actions of one snake brand the entire species as evil just as the actions of two humans have done the same to our species.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

How did I fail to argue against your points I didn't try to. Your opinion also isn't evidence. We know that snakes have been punished by God. Did it ever occur to you that humans aren't the only ones that can fall. The actions of one snake brand the entire species as evil just as the actions of two humans have done the same to our species.

You point to your own evidence, and yet fail to refute my points in turn. Do you not have anything to say to them?
And to show that my argument stands on its own, despite you not offering the same, I will still refute your evidence. Or at the very least, offer my own point of view on that subject. I view them as merely unfortunate bystanders hit by the curse set upon the Devil, being used as an reminder for humanity, who are rather favored by God in the Bible.
After all, otherwise, the Devil could have merely committed unspeakable and heinous deeds as a human, and then we would all be at fault for his acts since he was an actual human.
The more you continue your argument, the more you dig yourself into a hole because it is just illogical.

Heyo, take it to pms, at this point you're derailing the thread.