Yorth
Swordman
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2019
- Messages
- 243
- Points
- 133
If there is one thing that can be called the author's signature, it would be their style of narration. By that I mean every word that isn't the voice of a character. The words you choose to describe a scene are very important. Example, take these two sentence: My eyes shot open like a dragon waking up from his slumber. Flames scattered, tongues of fire lashed and whipped. It was if the flames had a mind of their own and they responded to my will. VS. I opened my eyes and by mare Loki's bootyhole were my enemies scarred. They flinched as the tongues of flame lashed out like the strands of medusa's hair. And medusa I was, but Perseus they had not. That day, my horrors-- No, my legend began.
The scene is the same, but the way it was described gave it very different undertones. While the first one was more punchy and straight to the point, the second one had more personality to it.
In my stories, I have experimented with both. They both worked marvelously and were well recieved by my readers. The problem that I face though is when I try to merge the two. Either I overdo it one way or the other or, in some cases, I completely misunderstand their utility. I wonder what's you guys' experience on the matter.
The scene is the same, but the way it was described gave it very different undertones. While the first one was more punchy and straight to the point, the second one had more personality to it.
In my stories, I have experimented with both. They both worked marvelously and were well recieved by my readers. The problem that I face though is when I try to merge the two. Either I overdo it one way or the other or, in some cases, I completely misunderstand their utility. I wonder what's you guys' experience on the matter.