Random order for reading lists

[foxoftheasterisk]

I have reading lists that are all stories I've completed, and frequently check these lists to reread stories. I'd like the ability to randomize the order of stories on the list so I can be presented with different stories each time I look at it, so I don't just keep rereading the same ones over and over.

 

[Empress_Omnii]

I have no preference for or against this... but also. Would

keep rereading the same ones over and over.

not be fault of your own?

Surely if you don't want to keep rereading something, you could just choose something else?

 

[CharlesEBrown]

I could get behind adding a "shuffle" button to the reading list but not a regular "randomize this" feature.

 

[Alski]

foxoftheasterisk's Profile | Scribble Hub

www.scribblehub.com

Your reading lists are full of things that have less than 1-10 chapters, instead of rereading the same things why don't you try branching out in to longer stories.

 

[foxoftheasterisk]

foxoftheasterisk's Profile | Scribble Hub

www.scribblehub.com

Your reading lists are full of things that have less than 1-10 chapters, instead of rereading the same things why don't you try branching out in to longer stories.

I like the short stories. It's not that I object to rereading...

I have no preference for or against this... but also. Would

not be fault of your own?

Surely if you don't want to keep rereading something, you could just choose something else?

Well, yes and no. I think I worded it poorly, it's less that I don't want to keep rereading my favorites, as I don't want to have ones I consistently skip over because of where they are in the list (because I scroll past them, etc.)

I could get behind adding a "shuffle" button to the reading list but not a regular "randomize this" feature.

? What's the difference you're getting at? That you'd have to push the shuffle button each time rather than having it a permanent setting? I suppose it might make more sense that way.

 

[CharlesEBrown]

? What's the difference you're getting at? That you'd have to push the shuffle button each time rather than having it a permanent setting? I suppose it might make more sense that way.

That was exactly my point.