Philosophical thought.

[COLOC_Kid]

if chaos's very nature is everything yet nothing(uncontrollable, unyielding, and transformative) then wouldn't chaos be the creator of order. Would that mean order is committing matricide by attempting to kill chaos. In addition wouldn't chaos welcome order since order would introduce a new variable which would lead to more turbulent time. In conclusion I feel Order only believes it's an enemy of chaos while it itself is strengthening its perceived enemy.

 

[High-in-the-skys]

This argument is deeply flawed...
Counter

First of all, Order would need chaotic elements to enforce it's rules so saying only one believes it's enemy is the other and they only strengthen their perceived enemy is false.

Second, If chaos continues growing, wouldn't order be overturned?

Third, if chaos is the only element remaining, how could one identify that it's really chaos if there's no order to differentiate it from?