NotaNuffian
This does spark joy.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2019
- Messages
- 5,318
- Points
- 233
Writers like to write their MCs as the paragon of good or at the very least, not hang their dirty laundry in front of the readers but would show others being bad and in the end, "defeated/ learnt their errors thanks to MC".
So is there anyone who tried to make their MC actually bad? Not background bad but show how good he is in front of readers, but actually heinous.
Got affected by Hunt with Clones, where the "bad" guild is using "underhand" tactics to try and kill MC. Everyone in the comments were frothing about death to the guild but all I can think of is "yeah, that is some good move". Be evil. Win at any cost.
Maybe I got affected by the chinese works too much, where one work actually had MC receiving missions to kill other worlds' geniuses because "a genius is only worthy when alive." His other missions include burning crops and destroying essential infrastructures. His own rationale, not his superior's, is that in the war between cultures, it is not about who's right, but who's left. And that there is no bottom line to have.
So is there anyone who tried to make their MC actually bad? Not background bad but show how good he is in front of readers, but actually heinous.
Got affected by Hunt with Clones, where the "bad" guild is using "underhand" tactics to try and kill MC. Everyone in the comments were frothing about death to the guild but all I can think of is "yeah, that is some good move". Be evil. Win at any cost.
Maybe I got affected by the chinese works too much, where one work actually had MC receiving missions to kill other worlds' geniuses because "a genius is only worthy when alive." His other missions include burning crops and destroying essential infrastructures. His own rationale, not his superior's, is that in the war between cultures, it is not about who's right, but who's left. And that there is no bottom line to have.