I want feedback for my story for my second novel.

Corrigible-steel

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2024
Messages
24
Points
53

"I have posted seven chapters of my story, Demon Slayer: The Cursed One, on Scribble Hub. Since I'm new to the platform, I would really appreciate your feedback. Could you let me know if the story is engaging, whether my grammar is good, and if the pacing and characterization are well done? Your input would mean a lot to me.
 

TheIcMan

Isekai Must Be Fixed
Joined
May 4, 2019
Messages
170
Points
83
Currently pretty busy today, so I took a quick cursory glance. I'll read what I can later, since I'm commenting, but I have to get this off my chest.
Webnovels that have "guidelines" or "disclaimers" as an entire chapter before the story starts is extremely off-putting. Same with 70% of your "synopsis". With poor judgement, someone can look at that and think you're just making excuses for how the story plays out. Like, everything you wrote should be an implicit understanding for the readers that you want to stick around.

Listen, I'm also a big fan of original characters who aren't stupidly OP, gentle and gratifying buildup, immersive world-building, and natural character growth. But I don't need an author who says all of this as introductory material when you should be demonstrating ALL of that in your story proper.

Like I said, since I want to provide actual feedback (and not just a nothing burger of complaints), I'll do so tomorrow. But you really must know that providing all of this info before a reader even reads the first word of your story already makes me skeptical if I want to even continue reading.
 

Corrigible-steel

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2024
Messages
24
Points
53
Currently pretty busy today, so I took a quick cursory glance. I'll read what I can later, since I'm commenting, but I have to get this off my chest.
Webnovels that have "guidelines" or "disclaimers" as an entire chapter before the story starts is extremely off-putting. Same with 70% of your "synopsis". With poor judgement, someone can look at that and think you're just making excuses for how the story plays out. Like, everything you wrote should be an implicit understanding for the readers that you want to stick around.

Listen, I'm also a big fan of original characters who aren't stupidly OP, gentle and gratifying buildup, immersive world-building, and natural character growth. But I don't need an author who says all of this as introductory material when you should be demonstrating ALL of that in your story proper.

Like I said, since I want to provide actual feedback (and not just a nothing burger of complaints), I'll do so tomorrow. But you really must know that providing all of this info before a reader even reads the first word of your story already makes me skeptical if I want to even continue reading

Hmm, good point. I will implement it
 

TheIcMan

Isekai Must Be Fixed
Joined
May 4, 2019
Messages
170
Points
83

Could you let me know if the story is engaging, whether my grammar is good, and if the pacing and characterization are well done? Your input would mean a lot to me.
As promised here I am.

The story is not engaging.
The grammar is decent.
The pacing is nonexistent.
The characterization, 404 not found.

For the record, I stopped after looking at what chapter 3 may bring to the table.

Chapter 1 sets the scene well enough. Decent description and imagery. Pretty immersive. Unfortunately it all falls apart when Kai starts talking. Getting a somber monologue about a loved one’s passing as an opener is not fun. And neither is the “feel sad now” energy you bring to the table. I don’t know this character. I don’t know who died. I don’t care. I can’t care.

And then you do a flashback in chapter 2. Which, uh, continues on. Which begs the question: why even start with the funeral? It just drains any sort of intrigue or connection we have to any of the characters.

Here we come to the worst of it. These “characters” in this scene aren’t real. They are mouthpieces for exposition and background to, I presume, understand the AU and the mechanics behind the original story. This is needed if no one read the original like me. HOWEVER. If this is the way you do it, you aren’t getting a reader. Because it’s all a nothing burger. It’s noise. Paragraphs upon paragraphs of exposition, in supposed “conversation”. This isn’t a dialogue between characters. It’s a boring demon slayer textbook. And I scrolled to the bottom of chapter 3 to see that you had the gall to give a glossary and A/N’s to say “guys this is important remember this”. There is absolutely no faith in your own project.

Kai doesn’t talk like a human. That may be what you’re going for, but how am I supposed to believe a frail malnourished child can talk like a professor with 20 morbillion phds. That may be a case of characterization, but there was no hint that that’s the case. This child just… talks like that I guess. Like some dictionary thesaurus. (I personally believe the main culprit behind this is your use of ChatGPT but I’m not confident).

The crux of the issue is you need characters and a reason I need to care. Introduce the demon slayer world building piece meal, one at a time, and SLOWLY. Interweave it with the characters and plot, rather than what you did, choking the reader with so much to digest.
 

Corrigible-steel

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2024
Messages
24
Points
53
As promised here I am.

The story is not engaging.
The grammar is decent.
The pacing is nonexistent.
The characterization, 404 not found.

For the record, I stopped after looking at what chapter 3 may bring to the table.

Chapter 1 sets the scene well enough. Decent description and imagery. Pretty immersive. Unfortunately it all falls apart when Kai starts talking. Getting a somber monologue about a loved one’s passing as an opener is not fun. And neither is the “feel sad now” energy you bring to the table. I don’t know this character. I don’t know who died. I don’t care. I can’t care.

And then you do a flashback in chapter 2. Which, uh, continues on. Which begs the question: why even start with the funeral? It just drains any sort of intrigue or connection we have to any of the characters.

Here we come to the worst of it. These “characters” in this scene aren’t real. They are mouthpieces for exposition and background to, I presume, understand the AU and the mechanics behind the original story. This is needed if no one read the original like me. HOWEVER. If this is the way you do it, you aren’t getting a reader. Because it’s all a nothing burger. It’s noise. Paragraphs upon paragraphs of exposition, in supposed “conversation”. This isn’t a dialogue between characters. It’s a boring demon slayer textbook. And I scrolled to the bottom of chapter 3 to see that you had the gall to give a glossary and A/N’s to say “guys this is important remember this”. There is absolutely no faith in your own project.

Kai doesn’t talk like a human. That may be what you’re going for, but how am I supposed to believe a frail malnourished child can talk like a professor with 20 morbillion phds. That may be a case of characterization, but there was no hint that that’s the case. This child just… talks like that I guess. Like some dictionary thesaurus. (I personally believe the main culprit behind this is your use of ChatGPT but I’m not confident).

The crux of the issue is you need characters and a reason I need to care. Introduce the demon slayer world building piece meal, one at a time, and SLOWLY. Interweave it with the characters and plot, rather than what you did, choking the reader with so much to digest.

Okay, though I want to bury my head in the ground, but thanks for giving some of your time for a honest review.

First of all, I will try to improve on the points you mentioned above. Meaning, I will not start with the funeral part. Also, I will remove the glossary (though I do think I should create separate space where some people can read it cause they are gonna ask stup... Ahem good questions.)

And about the way he talked, yeah, It was all written by me, though I do accept that I had used gpt/prowriting aid in order to polish that. (now seeing your comment that Kai talks like prof. X makes me want to choke myself to death.... Well english is the fourth language that I have learned myself as no one speaks it around me, so it is difficult for me to express the way they speak, though I don't have the right to say it to the readers. Can you give me pointers on dialogues?)

Now about the last part, I will definitely try to make people care about my characters (as you have mentioned).
Though it will be rough, I will try to improve.

Again thanks for giving some of your time.
 
Last edited:

CharlesEBrown

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Messages
4,749
Points
158
And about the way he talked, yeah, It was all written by me, though I do accept that I had used gpt/prowriting aid in order to polish that. (now seeing your comment that Kai talks like prof. X makes me want to choke myself to death.... Well English is the fourth language that I have learned myself as no one speaks it around me, so it is difficult for me to express the way they speak, though I don't have the right to say it to the readers. Can you give me pointers on dialogues?)
There are two ways to handle dialogue:

1) Go for a stylistic approach and just don't worry about it (very difficult to do and works best in comedies) or
2) Read a lot of authors who you believe handle it well and try to emulate their style until you can find a rhythm of your own.

One tool to help improve is to either read the passages aloud and see how they "sound" to you - or (though, from what you say about no one speaking English around you, this one would be very difficult) get someone else to read the dialogue aloud to get a feel for how it sounds.
So really: read and practice.
 

Corrigible-steel

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2024
Messages
24
Points
53
There are two ways to handle dialogue:

1) Go for a stylistic approach and just don't worry about it (very difficult to do and works best in comedies) or
2) Read a lot of authors who you believe handle it well and try to emulate their style until you can find a rhythm of your own.

One tool to help improve is to either read the passages aloud and see how they "sound" to you - or (though, from what you say about no one speaking English around you, this one would be very difficult) get someone else to read the dialogue aloud to get a feel for how it sounds.
So really: read and practice.
Yeah, I think it will a long journey for me, try to walk and fail, then walk again. Anyways I understand what you are trying to convey. Thank you
 

TheIcMan

Isekai Must Be Fixed
Joined
May 4, 2019
Messages
170
Points
83
Okay, though I want to bury my head in the ground, but thanks for giving some of your time for a honest review.

First of all, I will try to improve on the points you mentioned above. Meaning, I will not start with the funeral part. Also, I will remove the glossary (though I do think I should create separate space where some people can read it cause they are gonna ask stup... Ahem good questions.)

And about the way he talked, yeah, It was all written by me, though I do accept that I had used gpt/prowriting aid in order to polish that. (now seeing your comment that Kai talks like prof. X makes me want to choke myself to death.... Well english is the fourth language that I have learned myself as no one speaks it around me, so it is difficult for me to express the way they speak, though I don't have the right to say it to the readers. Can you give me pointers on dialogues?)

Now about the last part, I will definitely try to make people care about my characters (as you have mentioned).
Though it will be rough, I will try to improve.

Again thanks for giving some of your time.
Hey no worries man. I might've sounded harsh, but it's necessary.

First up: There's a legitimate glossary section for your work in the series editor. Use that to your advantage for the people that want it.

Second: Dialogue is tough as shit. People who have English as their first, primary, and only language (a.k.a me lmao) still have a tough time with it. You had it right with Lisa a couple times (although I do believe that's just my love for snarky, assertive women bleeding through LOL).

The important thing about it is knowing who your characters are. Seriously. Like I said, if your intention for Kai was that he's a boy genius capable of absorbing difficult books in fractions of a second, then I guess it makes sense he'd talk like an encyclopedia. If that's the case you should keep his way of talking. The main problem I have for that section of chapter 2 is the content of their conversation is literal nothing.

Super easy way of getting people to care for your characters is to show their humanity. As stated, I didn't read very far, so I don't know if you did this, but it'd be very nice to see how Kai and Lisa even met. I'm imagining that she's stumbling upon the road after heated arguments about her research and/or history. Whatever she's specialized in. And she finds Kai unconscious and starving. She takes him in, yadda yadda, develop a first connection between them, and then you can do a flashforward to all the info-dumping. I dunno. Just try anything to get them invested.

It's all trial and error.
 

Corrigible-steel

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2024
Messages
24
Points
53
Hey no worries man. I might've sounded harsh, but it's necessary.

First up: There's a legitimate glossary section for your work in the series editor. Use that to your advantage for the people that want it.

Second: Dialogue is tough as shit. People who have English as their first, primary, and only language (a.k.a me lmao) still have a tough time with it. You had it right with Lisa a couple times (although I do believe that's just my love for snarky, assertive women bleeding through LOL).

The important thing about it is knowing who your characters are. Seriously. Like I said, if your intention for Kai was that he's a boy genius capable of absorbing difficult books in fractions of a second, then I guess it makes sense he'd talk like an encyclopedia. If that's the case you should keep his way of talking. The main problem I have for that section of chapter 2 is the content of their conversation is literal nothing.

Super easy way of getting people to care for your characters is to show their humanity. As stated, I didn't read very far, so I don't know if you did this, but it'd be very nice to see how Kai and Lisa even met. I'm imagining that she's stumbling upon the road after heated arguments about her research and/or history. Whatever she's specialized in. And she finds Kai unconscious and starving. She takes him in, yadda yadda, develop a first connection between them, and then you can do a flashforward to all the info-dumping. I dunno. Just try anything to get them invested.

It's all trial and error.
I will apply your suggestion.
 

Tempokai

The Overworked One
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Messages
1,397
Points
153
I couldn't go further than Chapter 1. I couldn’t get through it without cringing as my inner critic performed Olympic-grade somersaults of secondhand embarrassment. Not because you can’t write a coherent sentence (congrats, you passed Writing 101), but because everything before Chapter 1 was a screaming parade of amateur red flags practically begging readers to abandon ship.

First, synopsis. This should be the storefront window that entices readers, but instead, it’s a sketchy food truck with no menu and a half-hearted “A for effort” sticker. It’s the literary equivalent of shouting, “I swear this isn’t just a rip-off of Demon Slayer!” Sure, you tried to deconstruct manga tropes and reshape them into your own snow-globe apocalypse, but here’s the rub: your rhetoric undercuts any authority or confidence in the story you’re selling. This is the failure of persuasion, and I can prove you why.

So, the synopsis fails at persuasion because it’s not enticing; it’s exhausting. Have you read it yourself at least few times like I did? A parade of clichés (“a world plunged into chaos,” “strength came at a heavy price”—yawn) shuts my brain down after trying to understand the synopsis. This isn’t a hook; it’s a checklist of overused tropes, lazily cobbled together. And just as I regretted clicking, I was ambushed by your author’s note.

You didn’t just squander your ethos (credibility)—you nuked it. I mean, who thought it was a good idea to cram a preemptive barrage of excuses, disclaimers, and unnecessary details right after the synopsis? Your job as a storyteller is to invite the reader into their world, to make them want to read. Instead, you essentially handed out pamphlets saying, “Here’s everything wrong with this story. Please lower your expectations accordingly.” Like, seriously? Geez, thanks for making my self proclaimed "job" as a resident forum roaster easier. Readers can read, shocking, I know. Readers don’t need you to announce that your protagonist isn’t a reincarnator or that the pace will be slow. Let the story show us these things instead of breaking the fourth wall to over-explain them. The sheer lack of trust in your audience is astounding. It screams, “I know this might suck, but please bear with me.” No, thank you, skip to the next story below.

And then, Chapter 1. Oh, Chapter 1. Where do I even start with this snow-covered dirge of mediocrity? Yes, the atmosphere is there. Yes, the imagery is pretty. But you know what it’s missing? A point. Your writing is so busy painting a bleak, wintry picture that it forgets to answer the most basic question: Why should I care?

Chapter 1 got a boy swinging an axe in the snow, dragging a body, lighting a pyre. Cool! But without any context, it’s all just noise. The pathos you’re clearly aiming for falls completely flat because the reader knows nothing about the boy or why this moment is important. Who the fuck is he, what’s this funeral to him, to the settlement, to the world? The vagueness isn’t intriguing—it’s frustrating. Ambiguity is a powerful tool, but only when used intentionally and with enough progression to keep the reader hooked, and here, it feels like you’re withholding for the sake of “mystery,” but it just comes off as shallow.

I get it, you’re going for a slow, atmospheric buildup. That’s fine. But slow doesn’t mean uneventful. The entire chapter is essentially a funeral procession, but without any emotions that are visible or meaningful. It feels like filler from a story that hasn’t earned its drama yet. Watching a sled dragged through snow might be atmospheric, but it’s also excruciatingly dull without a reason to care about the people involved.

At least your writing style it’s not terrible, but it’s drowning in passive voice and clunky sentences that sap the energy from the prose. I could practically hear you whispering, “How many times can I use the word ‘snow’ in this chapter before someone notices?” The answer: far too many. Repetition isn’t atmosphere; it’s laziness.

Then there’s the technical stuff: passive writing, awkward phrasing, and overindulgent descriptions that bog down what could’ve been a sharp, punchy opening. Whatever. Look, this isn’t irredeemable. Your worldmaking shows promise—Nelson Goodman from my guide might even nod in approval. You have thought of reshaping the Demon Slayer universe into something unique, but your persuasion is meandering, detail-heavy slog with all the emotional depth of a puddle. Persuasion is survival, and you have failed it.

You’re not writing for yourself anymore. You’re writing for an audience, and right now, it fails the basics of Persuasion 101. Focus on basics of storytelling, because currently foundation of your skill fails you. If this is the story you want to tell, stop treating your readers like idiots who need an author’s note to spell things out. They can read. Can you write? Because right now, it looks like you’re writing for yourself—and for an audience, that’s a death sentence.
 

Corrigible-steel

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2024
Messages
24
Points
53
First of all a loud "Ouch", and here I thought I have thick skin like a rhino, which can handle any kind of criticism, but this... this almost brought tears in my eyes?. I really had to bring all my courage and pray to my ancestors in order to read your brutally honest review.

Anyways jokes aside, thanks for giving your time to read my work and giving a honest/harsh review for my novel.(as cringe as it may seem to you). It's clear you put a lot of thought into your critique, and I value the honesty.

I wanted to take a moment to address the key points you raised:

1. The Synopsis
Yup, You’re absolutely right about the synopsis needing to be more enticing. I realize now that it leans too heavily on cliches and doesn’t showcase what makes my story unique. I’ll work on crafting a synopsis that feels more compelling and reflects the story's deeper themes without relying on overused tropes. (Though give me some pointers on that plz)

2. The Author’s Note
I see now how the author’s note might come across as undermining my story before it even begins. That wasn’t my intention, but I can see how it affects the tone and reader expectations. I’ll remove or revise it to trust readers to discover the story for themselves. (Though it will take some time I will definitely do it.)

3.Your critique of Chapter 1 hit home (literally knocked my balls). I wanted to build atmosphere (which you definitely noticed), but I now see how the lack of context made it hard for readers to connect with the protagonist or care about the funeral scene. I’ll work on balancing the imagery with emotional depth and providing enough details to make the Kai's actions meaningful without giving everything away.

4. Writing Style - I appreciate your notes on my writing style. I’ll be more mindful of avoiding passive voice (again I ask for tips) and repetitive word choices (yes, I overused "snow," and I hear you loud and clear). I’ll aim for tighter, more engaging prose that doesn’t bog down the pacing.

5. Persuasion- Your point about writing for an audience instead of just for myself is a..... crucial reminder. While this story is something I had prepared, I understand the importance of making it accessible and engaging for readers. I’ll focus on improving the foundations of storytelling. particularly stakes, clarity, and pacing, so the story resonates more strongly. (Though it will take time ....really long time, but I will make it work.)

Anyways, Thanks for your honesty. I hope to share a stronger version of this story in the future.
 
Top