Search results

:blobthumbsup: The tangent on your part is keenly noted.

:meowsip: And one you go with the insults~. :blob_melt: So socialist can be indeed be an economist. You just a priori deny them the predicative of being excellent, which is fine, though I think you did not read our predecessor carefully, when they correctly stressed the point of Correlation =/=...

:blob_reach: I see, so no is your response. So according to you, a socialist cannot be possibly an excellent economist despite the fact that you initially claimed that "No one in this thread has claimed that a socialist can't be an economist.". Apparently that was not the case. That being...

:blob_reach: You must give out the prizes~. Or declare the winners~.

:meowsip: You ignored the question. Yes or no~. Is my assumption correct, yes or no?

:meowsip: Something I can use~. Thx.

:meowsip: Nya~, how did you know? I was exposed~. That being said, your statement leaves me confused, so you are saying a socialist cannot be possibly an excellent economist? Is that what you are trying to say? Yes or no.

:meowsip: As it turns out, you seem to be an excellent economist.

:meowsip: "No one in this thread has claimed that a socialist can't be an economist." I see, so you agree that a socialist can be an economist, even possibly an excellent one. I am glad that we are on the same page then. I guess not point in arguing here any more~. It was all just a light...

:blob_neutral: Does anyone here know why replies in a thread might not appear under your notifications?

:blob_neutral: Let's put the name calling aside then and straighten this out ... What is your point? Mine is that the qualities of being a socialist and an economist are not mutually exclusive. What is yours?

:meowsip: I feel combative today~. And I sense cowardice in a certain thread from a certain user~.